WELCOME |
![]() |
![]() comments, ephemera, speculation, etc. (protected political speech and personal opinion) 2020- 2020-12-08 g THE ELECTORAL ABYSS III Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over
Election Rules
The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution. Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above. Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says: Certain officials in the Defendant States
presented the pandemic as the justification for
ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in
voting. The Defendant States flooded their
citizenry with tens of millions of ballot
applications and ballots in derogation of
statutory controls as to how they are lawfully
received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well
intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020
election less secure in the Defendant States.
Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state
laws and were made by non-legislative entities,
without any consent by the state legislatures. The
acts of these officials thus directly violated the
Constitution.
(read
more)This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution. ______________________ Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL, ______________________ |
...
News and facts for
those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio
version of reality.
|
|||||
|
If
you let them redefine words, they will control
language. If you let them control language, they will control thoughts. If you let them control thoughts, they will control you. They will own you. |
© 2020 - thenotimes.com - All Rights Reserved |