WELCOME |
![]() |
![]() comments, ephemera, speculation, etc. (protected political speech and personal opinion) 2021- 2021-05-20 h PROPAGANDA (A feminized Army can't protect America. No amount of propaganda can change biological facts.) Women in Combat
Occasionally I have written that placing women in physically demanding jobs in the military, as for example combat, is stupid and unworkable. Predictably I’ve gotten responses asserting that I hate women, abuse children, cannibalize orphans, and can’t get a date. A few, with truculence sometimes amplified by misspelling, have demanded supporting data. OK. The following are from documents I found in a closet, left over from my days as a syndicated military columnist (‘Soldiering,’ Universal Press Syndicate). Note the dates: All of this has been known for a long time. From the report of the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces (report date November 15, 1992, published in book form by Brassey’s in 1993): The
average female Army recruit is 4.8 inches shorter,
31.7 pounds lighter, has 37.4 fewer pounds of
muscle, and 5.7 more pounds of fat than the
average male recruit. She has only 55 percent of
the upper-body strength and 72 percent of the
lower-body strength... An Army study of 124 men
and 186 women done in 1988 found that women are
more than twice as likely to suffer leg injuries
and nearly five times as likely to suffer
fractures as men.
Further: The
Commission heard an abundance of expert testimony
about the physical differences between men and
women that can be summarized as follows:
Women’s aerobic capacity is significantly lower, meaning they cannot carry as much as far as fast as men, and they are more susceptible to fatigue. In terms of physical capability, the upper five percent of women are at the level of the male median. The average 20-to-30 year-old woman has the same aerobic capacity as a 50 year-old man. From the same report: Lt Col.
William Gregor, United States Army, testified
before the Commission regarding a survey he
conducted at an Army ROTC Advanced Summer Camp on
623 women and 3540 men.... Evidence Gregor
presented to the Commission includes:
(a) Using the standard Army Physical Fitness Test, he found that the upper quintile of women at West point achieved scores on the test equivalent to the bottom quintile of men. [...] (c) Only 21 women out of the initial 623 (3.4%) achieved a score equal to the male mean score of 260. (d) On the push-up test, only seven percent of women can meet a score of 60, while 78 percent of men exceed it. (e) Adopting a male standard of fitness at West Point would mean 70 percent of the women he studied would be separated as failures at the end of their junior year, only three percent would be eligible for the Recondo badge, and not one would receive the Army Physical Fitness badge. The following, quoted by Brian Mitchell in his book Women in the Military: Flirting With Disaster (Regnery, 1998) and widely known to students of the military, are results of a test the Navy did to see how well women could perform in damage control – i.e., tasks necessary to save a ship that had been hit. TEST % WOMEN FAILING % MEN FAILING BEFORE TRAINING AFTER TRAINING BEFORE TRAINING AFTER TRAINING Stretcher carry, level 63 38 0 0 Stretcher carry/up, down ladder 94 88 0 0 Fire hose 19 16 0 0 P250 pump, carry down 99 99 9 4 P250 pump, carry up 73 52 0 0 P250, start pump 90 75 0 0 Remove SSTO pump 99 99 0 0 Torque engine bolt 78 47 0 0 Also from the Commission’s report: Non-deployability
briefings before the Commission showed that women
were three times more non-deployable than men,
primarily due to pregnancy, during Operations
Desert Shield and Storm. According to Navy Captain
Martha Whitehead’s testimony before the
Commission, ‘the primary reason for the women
being unable to deploy was pregnancy, that
representing 47 percent of the women who could not
deploy.’
Maybe we need armored strollers. My friend Catherine Aspy graduated from Harvard in 1992 and (no, I’m not on drugs) enlisted in the Army in 1995. Her account was published in Reader’s Digest, February, 1999. She told me the following about her experiences: I was
stunned. The Army was a vast day-care center, full
of unmarried teen-age mothers using it as a
welfare home. I took training seriously and really
tried to keep up with the men. I found I couldn’t.
It wasn’t even close. I had no idea the difference
in physical ability was so huge. There were always
crowds of women sitting out exercises or on
crutches from training injuries.
They [the Army] were so scared of sexual harassment that women weren’t allowed to go anywhere without another woman along. They called them ‘Battle Buddies.’ It was crazy. I was twenty-six years old but I couldn’t go to the bathroom by myself. Women are going to take on the North Korean infantry, but need protection in the ladies’ room. Military policy is endlessly fascinating. When I was writing the military column, I looked into the experience of Canada, which tried the experiment of feminization. I got the report from Ottawa, as did the Commission. Said the Commission: After
extensive research, Canada has found little
evidence to support the integration of women into
ground units. Of 103 Canadian women who
volunteered to joint infantry units, only one
graduated the initial training course. The
Canadian experience corroborates the testimony of
LTC Gregor, who said the odds of selecting a woman
matching the physical size and strength of the
average male are more than 130-to-1.
From Military Medicine, October 1997, which I got from the Pentagon library: One-third
of 450 female soldiers surveyed indicated that
they experienced problematic urinary incontinence
during exercise and field training activities. The
other crucial finding of the survey was probably
that 13.3% of the respondents restricted fluids
significantly while participating in field
exercises. (p. 690)
Because peeing was embarrassing. Or, Kessler
et al found that the lifetime prevalence of PTSD
in the United States was twice as high among
women. (p. 661)
Depression, says MilMed, is far commoner among women, as are training injuries. Et cetera. The military is perfectly aware of all of this. Their own magazine has told them. They see it every day. But protecting careers, and rears, is more important than protecting the country. (read more) On the other hand: Maybe the Pentagon, while ignoring biology, is paying attention to Kipling? Read for yourself: The Female of the
Species
by Rudyard Kipling, 1911 When the Himalayan peasant meets the he-bear in his pride, He shouts to scare the monster, who will often turn aside. But the she-bear thus accosted rends the peasant tooth and nail. For the female of the species is more deadly than the male. When Nag the basking cobra hears the careless foot of man, He will sometimes wriggle sideways and avoid it if he can. But his mate makes no such motion where she camps beside the trail. For the female of the species is more deadly than the male. When the early Jesuit fathers preached to Hurons and Choctaws, They prayed to be delivered from the vengeance of the squaws. ’Twas the women, not the warriors, turned those stark enthusiasts pale. For the female of the species is more deadly than the male. Man’s timid heart is bursting with the things he must not say, For the Woman that God gave him isn’t his to give away; But when hunter meets with husbands, each confirms the other’s tale – The female of the species is more deadly than the male. Man, a bear in most relations – worm and savage otherwise, – Man propounds negotiations, Man accepts the compromise. Very rarely will he squarely push the logic of a fact To its ultimate conclusion in unmitigated act. Fear, or foolishness, impels him, ere he lay the wicked low, To concede some form of trial even to his fiercest foe. Mirth obscene diverts his anger – Doubt and Pity oft perplex Him in dealing with an issue – to the scandal of The Sex! But the Woman that God gave him, every fibre of her frame Proves her launched for one sole issue, armed and engined for the same, And to serve that single issue, lest the generations fail, The female of the species must be deadlier than the male. She who faces Death by torture for each life beneath her breast May not deal in doubt or pity – must not swerve for fact or jest. These be purely male diversions – not in these her honour dwells. She the Other Law we live by, is that Law and nothing else. She can bring no more to living than the powers that make her great As the Mother of the Infant and the Mistress of the Mate. And when Babe and Man are lacking and she strides unclaimed to claim Her right as femme (and baron), her equipment is the same. She is wedded to convictions – in default of grosser ties; Her contentions are her children, Heaven help him who denies! – He will meet no suave discussion, but the instant, white-hot, wild, Wakened female of the species warring as for spouse and child. Unprovoked and awful charges – even so the she-bear fights, Speech that drips, corrodes, and poisons – even so the cobra bites, Scientific vivisection of one nerve till it is raw And the victim writhes in anguish – like the Jesuit with the squaw! So it comes that Man, the coward, when he gathers to confer With his fellow-braves in council, dare not leave a place for her Where, at war with Life and Conscience, he uplifts his erring hands To some God of Abstract Justice – which no woman understands. And Man knows it! Knows, moreover, that the Woman that God gave him Must command but may not govern – shall enthrall but not enslave him. And She knows, because She warns him, and Her instincts never fail, That the Female of Her Species is more deadly than the Male. ______________________ Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL, ______________________ |
...
News and facts for
those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio
version of reality.
|
|||||
|
If
you let them redefine words, they will control
language. If you let them control language, they will control thoughts. If you let them control thoughts, they will control you. They will own you. |
© 2020 - 2021 - thenotimes.com - All Rights Reserved |