The Blog

2021-

2021-08-04 a

The whole ‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990’s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing but it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to it.

— Greg Jefferys

Editor's Note:

Apparently, based on reactions, too many of you believe the Out-of Africa or African Eve theories of human origins. Those theories were always rather speculative but the Academic Left and popular press treat them as etched in stone for ideological reasons. Currently, one group claims the common ancestor of Sub-Saharan Africans and Caucasians lived at least 125,000 years before the present (around the time of the Eemian Interglacial). Others think the common ancestor dates to 160,000 years before the present. Either way the two groups are so distinct that in any other field, taxonomists would place them in different subspecies or even different species.

Now, don't tell me interspecific hybrids are not possible. The mule is an interspecific hybrid; so are lion/tiger crosses and horse/zebra crosses.

Not only is race real, our biological/genetic differences go far beyond race and are best described as specific or subspecific differences. Yes, that statement makes many uncomfortable, but facts are facts. Modern humans are best understood as belonging to three distinct genetic lineages:
1. those with Neanderthal admixture - Europeans and Asians
2. those with Denisovan admixture - Australian Aboriginals
3. those with "ghost archaic DNA" admixture - Sub-Saharan Africans

See the origin of the popular myth:

Allan C. Wilson and Rebecca L. Cann, "The Recent African Genesis of Humans," Scientific American, April 1992: 68.

______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL,
______________________