WELCOME |
![]() |
![]() comments, ephemera, speculation, etc. (protected political speech and personal opinion) 2021- 2021-12-02 d THE COVID-CON IV The mask slips
______________________Mask obsessives just want to signal their superiority over the selfish, germ-spreading others. For most of us, the UK government’s announcement that masks are mandatory once again in shops and on public transport was dispiriting – a reminder that any return to normality is provisional. Restrictions can be reimposed at any moment. But for those keen to live their lives forever in Covid’s shadow – always vigilant, always on guard – the return of a mask mandate was the best news they had received since last January’s lockdown. They love masks, you see. They’re obsessed with them. Their only
complaint was that the current mask mandate doesn’t
go far enough. After all, if you’re
going to organise your entire existence around a
viral threat, partial measures just won’t do. A
mask mandate in shops? Why not in cafés and pubs,
too? That was certainly the view of London mayor Sadiq Khan. ‘If you’re in a pub, bar or restaurant, particularly if you’re standing up in one of those’, he said, ‘wear a face mask’. The professional social distancers of Independent SAGE were also quick to demand the extension of the mask mandate. ‘We need to reinstate them in secondary schools, including in classrooms’, demanded Professor Christina Pagel. Fellow Indie SAGE member Professor Martin McKee went further and urged the wearing of face masks in all indoor settings. It must be quite the party chez McKee. Perhaps
if masks had a significant impact on Covid
transmission and infection rates, the obsession
with face coverings would start to make sense. But for all the claims made for their
efficacy, and the overzealous reporting of such claims, their
impact is still hotly disputed. At
best we can probably say that masks, by themselves,
have a small impact on the spread of Covid. So, if it’s not their practical benefit, what is it about masks that drives their champions wild? The answer lies in the sheer theatre of it all. First,
masking up provides the performer with a sense of control over
his environment. It makes him feel protected, as
if he has some power over the virus. Like airport
security checks, the putting on of a mask is a
modern-day ritual in risk-aversion. It creates an illusory sense of safety. Secondly, and more importantly, mask-wearing has become a symbolic performance. It is a way of signifying something about oneself as a person. It is no longer just a bit of fabric stretching over one’s nose and under one’s chin – it is a sign of one’s virtue, a projection of one’s good character. It says to the world, ‘I’m a moral person’. As one prominent
champion of lockdown measures wrote this week, ‘To me,
everyone wearing masks signals a sense of community
where people care for and look after each other, and
we collectively protect everyone’. In
other words, mask-wearers are people who possess
’empathy’, as a piece in Vox put it. And, just as crucially, that makes mask-wearers very different to those who choose not to wear masks. The maskless are people who don’t care about others, who think only of themselves and their own so-called freedoms. As one pundit puts it, these people think their ‘right to ignore public-health advice… trumps someone else’s right to live’ – as if those who don’t wear masks are deliberately killing people with their germs. One Guardian columnist paints a typically snobbish
portrait of those she sees as archetypal mask
refuseniks. They’re thoughtless types who are
indifferent to the public good. They bang on
endlessly about their pet conspiracy theories. And
they’re nationalist ‘poppy shaggers’ who can’t help
but always bring up the Second World War. Her piece
is illustrated with a picture of two maskless
middle-aged blokes. This kind of
derogatory stereotyping isn’t accidental. For mask-wearing to work as a symbol of
virtue, those who choose not to wear masks have to
be demonised. And that’s why the Great Covid Mask
Debate is so angry and divisive. Because mask
obsessives are not only saying something positive
about themselves – they’re also saying something
very negative about the unmasked. Face coverings
may not have a huge impact on the spread of Covid
— but they certainly impact on social solidarity.
(read
more) Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL, ______________________ |
...
News and facts for
those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio
version of reality.
|
|||||
|
If
you let them redefine words, they will control
language. If you let them control language, they will control thoughts. If you let them control thoughts, they will control you. They will own you. |
© 2020 - 2021 - thenotimes.com - All Rights Reserved |