Needless to say, he was quite enamored with both. In his first book, “Dreams From My Father,” Obama wrote of his college years, “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.” This was perhaps the event that sparked his desire to “fundamentally transform America.”

To say that Saul Alinsky, and his book, “Rules for Radicals” was an inspiration to Cloward and Piven would be a gross understatement, but Aliinsky’s “Rules” were a blueprint for how to win individual battles in the quest for socialism and Marxism. Cloward and Piven drew upon Alinsky’s “Rules” to create a strategy on how to win the war.

During his eight years in the Oval Office, Obama employed many of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules” but he was under the proverbial microscope and unable to make drastic moves as quickly as he wanted. He also discovered that neither “fundamental transformation” nor social re-engineering was going to come cheap. It needed a bankroll.

Obama could smooth-talk idiots into occupying Wall Street, but somebody had to pay for it. Obama could verbally and morally support Black Lives Matter, but somebody would have to pay for the infrastructure to move those people around the country and do the things necessary to further divide the country.

Obama went to the bank of George Soros to secure the funding he needed but time was not his friend. He only had two terms in office, and the “fundamental transformation of America” would require more time than term limits allowed. Hillary was to have been Obama’s third term, the time necessary to finish the job, but President Trump got in the way.

Obama’s answer to Trump was to ratchet up the pressure, basically Alinsky’s “Rule number 8.” More BLM, introduce and grow Antifa, incite racial division, false allegations against Trump, impeachment and its sequel, riots, looting, arson, violence in the streets and let’s not forget the role played by shills like the “squad” in driving that divide deeper and deeper.

Regardless of what tactics were employed to end President Trump’s America First policies, his booming economy, our energy independence and our re-establishment at the front and center of the world stage, Trump kept on winning. His policies were lifting all Americans, facts that obviously angered Obama greatly.

In four short years, President Trump had all but erased the anti-American Obama strategy. Trump lifted America to grand heights domestically, economically and in the arena of foreign policy. It was too much for Obama to bear. It had to come to an end, and neither he, who had invested his time and energy, nor Soros, who had invested a small fortune of his money, could risk another four years of President Trump.

They rigged the 2020 election. We know that doesn’t sit well with social media or the mainstream media, but there is no way you can ever convince the majority of the American people that a man with severely diminished mental capabilities who campaigned from his basement bunker and made no sense when he rarely ventured outside, a man who couldn’t draw more than a dozen people to a campaign rally and was constantly making derogatory comments to his own voters could have garnered 81 million votes without the fix being in.

That is especially incredulous given that. for the first time in U.S. history, an incumbent increased his vote total over that of four years before. The election was stolen, obviously, and Obama installed his puppet to be his third term.

The strategy by Cloward and Piven is only four steps, but don’t be fooled, Biden isn’t following those steps. He lacks the mental capacity to follow the directions on a box of instant pudding. What we’re seeing taking place in our country today is Obama’s master plan, derived from Cloward-Piven. He’s pulling Biden’s puppet strings and when the heat gets to be too much for that particular puppet.

Biden will be forced out under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment and replaced by Kamala Harris whose blind political ambition will have her dancing like Obama’s cackling marionette. What Biden has not accomplished by that time of Cloward-Piven’s agenda will be completed by Harris.

The first step is to overload and break the welfare system. COVID is just part of the excuse as people are soon to be out of work because Biden’s unconstitutional CCP virus mandates will force small businesses to close their doors.

Though there are multiple court challenges to those orders, they will be enforced as long as the Supreme Court allows them to stand, and there is no guarantee the Obama minions controlling Biden will pay attention to a negative decision. They are already ignoring SCOTUS’ telling the cabal to reinstate “remain in Mexico” as instituted by President Trump

Add to that the fact that the welfare and unemployment systems are now paying people more not to work than they were making while employed. Throw in more than 2 million welfare reliant illegal aliens per year into the system and Cloward and Piven’s first box is checked off.

The next step is, have chaos ensue. The defund the police movement, inspired and driven by the ilk of domestic terrorists like the BLM and Antifa has violent crime rates soaring as cities defund their police departments and thousands more police officers leave the job for lack of local government support. CCP virus mandates have society in an uproar.

Critical Race Theory is being implemented in schools from kindergarten to universities and Attorney General Merrick Garland  has ordered the FBI to investigate as “domestic terrorists” those parents who would dare challenge the curriculum at school board meetings. The puppet master left Americans and our allies behind in Afghanistan ― leaving Biden to take the blame ― the border crisis is out of control, inflation is on the rise, gas prices and our growing disaster on the world stage is all creating mass chaos. Box number two is checked off.

Then they will take control of the chaos. That is Cloward-Piven’s third step. We will be told Kamala Harris is doing just that the day Obama pulls the plug on Joe Biden via the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. The reality of that situation will simply be more of the same only with new and more deceptive cover being provided by Obama’s propagandists in the mainstream media. That will check box number three.

Lastly, they will implement Fascist socialism through government force. If you don’t believe this is Obama’s end game and the dream of every elected liberal Fascist then you haven’t been paying attention to the political landscape since LBJ was in office. If you don’t think we’re better than half way there now, you’re simply blind to reality.

What do we do? How to fend off this attack on our liberties, freedoms, on our Constitution and our economy?

There is only one way: We prepare to fight.

History makes it clear that the United States was founded by people who endured a repressive government seated 3,000 miles away. After putting their lives, families and fortunes on the line in the American Revolution, their primary goal was to prevent such a repressive society from emerging again. The Founders and Framers had to personally reckon with criminalized speech, arbitrary arrest, state sanctioned torture and even murder ― in short, exactly what we are now facing

So, at great personal sacrifice, they signed the Declaration of Independence. Had they lost the Revolutionary War, they would all have been executed, so the stakes could not have been higher. But they didn’t lose. They shocked the world, and as a result, our founding fathers constructed a carefully balanced system defined by the Constitution to make sure no tyrant could ever come to power.

We’re now facing multiple scenarios that could obliterate that delicate balance. Those “four steps” of Cloward and Piven are the tool by which they are accomplishing it. They have been executed to perfection and have us on the brink of dictatorship and oppression.

We are facing a shift in our balance of power. Apparently abandoning efforts to pack the Court because of opposition within the Fascist party calling itself Democrats, they have adopted a strategy of simply ignoring court rulings they don’t like. This is a new legal structure that will allow for the legalization of tyrannical reign and “legally” override the carefully constructed governmental balance between the legislative, executive and judicial branches that has previously served to prevent tyranny in the U.S.

This three-tier branch, constructed to safeguard our freedoms, is under direct attack, and this is not a partisan issue. Everyone needs to wake up to this fact. It’s an issue of freedom versus tyranny.

In order to do so, we must organize as a people. Regardless of your ideology, we can safely say that the vast majority of Americans do not want a Fascist dictatorship. Those that do amount to less than a fifth of the U.S. population. The legitimate votes that were cast in November 2020 were not so much pro-Biden as they were anti-Trump. Mean tweets and bombast from the 45th president over his four-year term took its toll, even though he got more than enough votes to be reelected ― and as noted, he probably was reelected.

We are seeing the beginning of this by the activism at local school board meetings as parents protest the teaching of CRT, mask mandates that harm their children and vaccine orders that make no sense for elementary-aged children since they are not susceptible to serious infections.

Those school board appearances, however, do not go far enough.

We need to take that kind of activism into the city council meetings, county commissions and state legislatures. We must challenge this rogue Fascist federal government. We need to make our voices heard. When they try to prevent us from speaking, we need to get louder and make sure they hear us.

Of course, that’s going to lead to arrests. We as Americans cannot be afraid of that threat. Its not pleasant, its antithetical to how we expect to live ― and it is absolutely necessary. If we use ourselves to flood the legal system by accepting our fates when we stand for our rights, there will come a point that the police and sheriff’s departments will no longer take action that prevents them from having jail space for real criminals.

We keep righting for our rights and the rights of our children. We keep speaking loudly against tyranny. We continue to disrupt the illegal and immoral actions of these bodies of government. We make ourselves known as a people ― as the American people ― who will not docilely accept their mandates, their declarations, their fraudulent orders.

What, you ask, if they use force to enforce their tyranny, their oppression, their despotism? We post the answer to that in the form of another question: What did the Founders and Framers do?

We do the same.

This is a time to accept great sacrifice, perhaps the ultimate sacrifice, in order to put an end to tin-pot tyrants who have only their own self-interests at heart, who lie, cheat, steal ― and yes, murder ― to put themselves in power and make us their disloyal but powerless subjects.

To avoid that ignominious fate we must implement our own four-step plan. We organize, we stand, we resist, we fight. We have no other choice, and the time is getting late. As was once said, it is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.

To paraphrase another famous saying, these are times that try men’s and women’s souls, our resolve, our love of freedom. We either step up and do what must be done, or, as Ronald Reagan said, we will enter a thousand years of darkness. (read more)

But new evidence casts doubt on one of the most ambitious promises underlying Brown v. Board of Education and the decades of work that followed: that America’s prejudices might be alleviated through the mingling of children from diverse backgrounds. In a study of racial and political attitudes between the 1990s and 2010s, one scholar has found that exposure to desegregated schools led white people to view African Americans more negatively and decreased their willingness to support policies like affirmative action.

The study, released in November as a working paper through Brown University’s Annenberg Institute for School Reform, was authored by Mark Chin, a doctoral student at Harvard. Examining multiple strands of data, Chin found that the unintended consequences of integration were especially evident in areas where resistance to it was strongest, such as the South.

In an interview with The 74, Chin said his research shows that whatever the benefits of mixed schools — a wealth of research suggests that Black students perform better academically when they learn alongside children of other races, while white students perform no worse than they would otherwise — we cannot assume that they will improve race relations or produce more liberal-minded adults.

“We have a pretty good sense of [the ways in which] desegregation improved outcomes for Black youth, and a lot of them don’t necessarily require that schools integrate,” he said in an interview. “So if we’re going to go down the path toward integration, which is very controversial policy-wise, we should also know what the positive or negative spillover effects are.”

VIDEO: Did Desegregation Fail?

The hypothesis gained steam after the [problematic] integration of the U.S. armed forces, and Allport’s highly influential book on the subject, The Nature of Prejudice, was published the same year that the Supreme Court considered Brown v. Board. But more than a half-century of investigation has found little in the way of causal evidence demonstrating its effects vis-a-vis race. A 2018 meta-analysis conducted by Princeton professor Betsy Levy Paluck addressed only a handful of randomized experiments that specifically focused on school environments, and found that different forms of prejudice were mitigated to dramatically different degrees.

Chin sought to address gaps in the research by looking at how the racial integration of schools affected white people later in life. To do so, he used responses to the General Social Survey, a long-running sociological survey collected since 1972 by the University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center. The GSS poses a number of questions pertaining to race and politics, asking participants to define their partisan allegiance, rate their openness to more spending to benefit African Americans, and characterize members of different racial groups with respect to qualities like intelligence and laziness. Chin compiled the various testing items into composite scores for each respondent.

Chin’s sample included nearly 11,000 white participants across 159 counties that came under court-ordered desegregation mandates between the 1950s and 1980s; the differing timelines for each such order allowed Chin to track if and when racial attitudes had changed in response to the process of school desegregation. In particular, he differentiated between respondents who were plausibly school-aged (i.e., 17 and younger) when their school district first came under its desegregation mandate and those who were somewhat older.

Strikingly, whites who were exposed to desegregated schools were more negative in their appraisals of African Americans and social programs, and less likely to describe themselves as politically liberal as adults. The trend was especially pronounced in areas where the drive to desegregate met with greater obstinance, Chin found. That included Southern counties that integrated following the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which applied stiff legal penalties against school districts that attempted to stall the process; it was also true in counties that saw declining support for Democratic presidential candidates between the years 1960 and 1968, when the party prominently associated itself with the civil rights movement.

In Chin’s view, those findings actually support part of the “contact hypothesis.” In his writings, Allport made clear that he did not believe that contact between different groups would yield friendlier relations on its own. The interactions would have to be conducted within a specific context, he believed, with both groups pursuing similar goals on equivalent footing and with the unequivocal support of political and social institutions. When those conditions were not met — witness acts of “massive resistance” in Southern states, or the riots in response to school busing in northern cities like Boston — contact could actually make matters worse, Allport stipulated.

“There was a lot of pushback and a lot of controversy around different busing or integration policies,” Chin observed. “That supported Allport’s theory that when there’s limited external support for inter-group contact, you can see worse attitudes. That’s what I think explains the findings here.”

Importantly, some qualitative research has indicated that undergoing the process of integration led to positive results for students of all racial extractions. When researchers at Columbia University’s Teachers College interviewed graduates from six desegregated high schools, participants said they greatly valued the experience as an early and worthwhile encounter with members of communities different from their own. Still, most of them — especially whites — described themselves as living in much more homogenous communities as adults and said that their own children didn’t attend racially diverse schools.

The study doesn’t necessarily argue against contemporary efforts to break down racial divisions in K-12 schooling, or even against the idea that school integration per se might lead to less racism among white students who participate in it. But the mid-century campaign of desegregation was the among the most ambitious and effective engines of diversification that has ever been attempted, Chin observed — and one of its most hoped-for effects does not seem to have materialized.

“I’m not convinced that integration always doesn’t work. In my theory of a transformed society, we would all be in more integrated spaces. But there’s a link missing because it’s so hard to get spaces to integrate….We need to improve people’s racial attitudes and behaviors and empathy toward others. But [school integration] is what I thought would have done that.” (read more)

“The government-trained domestic terrorist who
willfully plowed into the Waukesha Christmas
parade  — Darrell E. Brooks — was wrongfully out
on bail for a charge of running someone over on
November 5, 2021, but he was let out ON PURPOSE.
Serial murderers and convicted felons are routinely
released from jail to do dirty deeds for The Powers
That Be.  Sometimes federal and state prison
sentences are improperly reduced to place a
hardened criminal on the street in order to carry
out a special unlawful mission or terror attack for
the power elite.   

— Intelligence Analyst & Former U.S. Military Officer

Undeniably, the timing of the Waukesha terrorist attack was made to occur right after the Rittenhouse trial which ended in Kyle’s complete and unanimous acquittal.  In this manner, the people of Wisconsin were delivered a hard blow for rightly vindicating an innocent man who was relentlessly persecuted by the Left and the Mainstream Media.

However, there’s another major reason for this extremely violent and premeditated attack against the American people in Wisconsin.

There is a rapidly rising crescendo of protests throughout the world community of nations that can no longer be ignored by the CIA’s Mockingbird Media.  And, the utterly treacherous corporate media in America has been given strict orders not to cover those massive protests and riots for fear of the U.S. citizenry of catching on.

The elites certainly don’t want US out in the street and/or shutting the whole place down.  Such an eventuality would show the whole world that the New World Order globalist cabal is losing its power and influence by the day.

Therefore, the only way the NWO cabal can thwart the inevitable mass awakening of the American people is to do what they always do—distract US.  This is one of the primary reasons why they executed such an atrocious black operation just prior to Thanksgiving in Waukesha.

The fact that this well-planned terrorist attack targeted a “Christmas parade” further advances the agenda of Cultural Marxism whose aim is to destroy Christianity throughout the USA.  The perfidious cultural marxists have spent decades trying replace Christmas with anything else that will stick in an effort to diminish the biggest Christian holiday of the year.

These godless CM creatures are likewise attempting to replace Thanksgiving Day with Black Friday—a day dedicated to unbridled consumer spending across the country.  Folks don’t even sit down on Thanksgiving anymore they are so preoccupied with the once-a-year Internet sales on the following day.

KEY POINTS: It’s important to correctly understand that all terror attacks have multiple goals and purposes.  Whereas the globalists wanted to punish the great state of Wisconsin for meting out justice for the Rittenhouse case, they are also exceedingly desperate to change the global conversation away from the rapidly intensifying Covid vax mandate protests.  Their biggest fear is that We the People take back our power in all 50 states, because such a sea change will see the elites hanged live on the Internet for their countless crimes against humanity committed over centuries.

Summary

There is no doubt the mRNA vaccines are causing prion diseases. People didn’t have these diseases before the shot and suddenly they develop them after the shot. There is no other explanation for this. None of the “fact checkers” can explain the cause of the excess rates. Prion diseases are incurable and always fatal. You can die as soon as 6 weeks after COVID vaccination (see within 6 weeks and within 6 months examples).

However, Twitter believes this is not true, but they refuse to tell anyone why they think that. Other fact checkers who have checked this out never did a VAERS query and are unable to explain away the “excess” number of reports other than doing a blanket dismissal that everything in VAERS is fraudulent without providing any evidence of that claim (other than one report out of 1.6M reports).

None of the fact checkers will debate on this to set the record straight.

Twitter refuses to tell us what I said that was misleading?

Twitter won’t tell me that!!!! They are deliberately withholding their definitive analysis on this extremely important scientific issue. Why???

I really want to know. Obviously, Twitter fact-checkers (all of whom I presume must have PhD degrees or MD degrees to be able to assess my claims) were able to quickly read all the medical literature and determine without a doubt I made an error and should be terminated for making a mistake. But they won’t tell me the mistake!!

If they want to fight misinformation, why aren’t they posting a link to their research proving me wrong when they terminate the account. They obviously invested hours of time in the research before they terminated me. Why not provide a link to that research so everyone can learn from it including me??

Here’s the evidence for my claim

Back in May 2021 when Professor Byram Bridle was disclosing the FOIA request on the Pfizer vaccine bio-distribution data he mentioned that the spike protein was associated with Lewy body formation which is linked to prion diseases. He expressed concern that the vaccines could cause prion diseases like dementia, Alzheimer’s, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

What do you know. He was right. Now we have proof.

Check out these VAERS query results. These searches are over all 30 years of VAERS and all 70+ vaccines. See anything unusual? Yeah, for less than 1 year of the COVID vaccines, the results are off the charts.

Remember, these are 30 year searches for all vaccines. Clearly there are excess reports. And we know VAERS isn’t being “over-reported” this year which I’ve shown many times before (events not caused by the vaccine are reported at rates comparable to other vaccines).

If it wasn’t the COVID vaccines causing this, what was the cause?

Nobody can answer that question, not even the Twitter fact checkers!

For further reading, check out these articles:

1. Jessica Rose’s article on COVID vaccines and prion diseases

2. Stephanie Seneff’s paper on prion disease and the COVID vaccines

3. Bart Classen’s paper linking the vaccines and prion diseases

4. SARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and induces Lewy body formation in macaques

5. SARS-CoV-2 Prion-Like Domains in Spike Proteins Enable Higher Affinity to ACE2

And compare them to some of the “fact checks” which claim there are no instances in VAERS which as you can see from the queries above (which you can replicate yourself):

1. USA Today fact check on prion disease

2. Politifact "fact check" on prion diseases

You decide who is telling the truth.

And note that the “fact checkers” never did a single VAERS query. Wow. That’s the first place you’d look to prove the claim is false. (read more)

Let me grab an old study from Japanese scientists, who tried to answer the question: Under what circumstances do we see antibody dependent enhancement? That is, a situation in which the virus uses your overall vaccine induced antibody response to its own advantage, leaving you worse off than if you had never been vaccinated in the first place. They determined it’s pretty easy: You take Delta and you add these four mutations:

K417N, N439K, E484K and N501Y.

If you throw those four mutations into Delta, you have a version that uses your vaccine induced antibody response to its own advantage.

Does that ring a bell?

Just spotted: very small cluster of variant associated with Southern Africa with very long branch length and really awful Spike mutation profile including RBD – K417N, N440K, G446S, S477N, T478K, E484A, Q493K, G496S, Q498R, N501Y, Y505Hhttps://t.co/kgA9c1hKDa

— Tom Peacock (@PeacockFlu) November 23, 2021

So let’s see:

-K417N: Bingo!

-N439K: No, but we have N440K which is a neighboring mutation and should perform the same trick of interfering with the antibodies.

-E484K: We have E484A, which means you have a mutation at the same spot, but resulting in a different amino acid, Alanine instead of Lysine.

-N501Y: Bingo!

In other words, its mutations look pretty much identical to what the Japanese scientists were warning would allow Delta to use your vaccine induced antibody response to its own advantage. Oops.

(1) Let me save you the suspense. News reports that “effectiveness of vaccines against B.1.1.529 will be determined in two weeks.” Those tests will find that the vaccines don’t produce neutralizing antibodies against the new variant.

— Dr. Jacob Glanville (@CurlyJungleJake) November 26, 2021

The vaccine manufacturers are saying they’ll need two weeks before figuring out whether the vaccines will need to be updated or not.  I don’t think you need two weeks to figure out these vaccines are useless against this thing. If healthy 32 year old triple vaccinated people are getting infected and spreading this thing, then your vaccine is useless.

This leads to a number of awkward questions: I thought you were going to update these vaccines for Delta? Now there’s a new variant, unrelated to Delta, but you’re going to update the vaccines for this new variant? Oh and what does that mean for the people who were scheduled to receive their booster to the original variant?

I give it two months at most, before you’ll be starting to see a consensus shift: These vaccines were a big mistake. Now you can see why. A new variant emerges that seems to have evolved in someone who was HIV positive while infected for an extended period of time with SARS-COV-2, giving the virus ample time to figure out an optimal solution to the vaccine induced immune response.

The other awkward question they don’t want to address is as follows: How are you going to avoid an original antigenic sin response to your new variant-specific strain? How do you make sure your new vaccine updated for this new strain isn’t just going to boost the antibodies originally developed against the original strain you vaccinated everyone against? They have no solution. In fact, this new strain spreads so fast that if it escapes our attempts to contain it (which all evidence suggests will be the case), the new variant specific vaccine will come far too late to make a difference.

And that’s when it gets ugly. With influenza, we have an age-stratified layered immune response: The influenza virus changes over time, so different age categories have different immune responses to influenza. If a new variant emerges that makes optimal use of one age category’s immune response, it won’t help it spread in other age categories.

For this virus, we injected everyone with vaccines that target an identical Spike protein. This means that most adults in the Western world now have a highly similar immune response to this virus. All it takes is one variant of this virus that figures out how to use that immune response to its own advantage and you’re faced with a disaster.

When you try to generate a highly identical immune response against this virus in everyone, to protect 0.3% of the population, you’re setting your whole society up for disaster when some variant of this virus comes into existence that isn’t affected by this vaccine induced immune response.

The vaccines were a mistake. You can’t develop a quick and easy fix to a problem like this. When you have a respiratory virus that kills around 0.3% of people it infects, overwhelmingly elderly people in poor health, then you’re better off asking yourself what leaves 0.3% of people unable to fight off this virus and focusing on addressing those underlying problems. (read more)

For example, the vaccine has failed to stop infection and spread against Delta. We have research findings by Singanayagam et al. (fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts), by Chau et al. (viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases in vaccinated nurses were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with prior strains early 2020), and by Riemersma et al. (no difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated individuals to those who have vaccine “breakthrough” infections and if vaccinated individuals become infected with the delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others) that reveal the vaccines have very suboptimal efficacy. 

This situation of the vaccinated being infectious and transmitting the virus has also emerged in seminal nosocomial outbreak papers by Chau et al. (HCWs in Vietnam), the Finland hospital outbreak (spread among HCWs and patients), and the Israel hospital outbreak (spread among HCWs and patients). These studies have also revealed that the PPE and masking were essentially ineffective within the healthcare setting. All of the HCWs were double-vaccinated yet there was extensive spread to themselves and their patients. 

In addition, Nordström et al. (vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer against infection waned progressively from 92% day 15-30 to 47% day 121-180, and from day 211 and onwards no effectiveness), Suthar et al. (a substantial waning of antibody responses and T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, at 6 months following the second immunization), Yahi et al. (with Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity), Juthani et al. (higher numbers of patients with severe or critical illness in those who received the Pfizer vaccine), Gazit et al. (SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant, and substantially elevated risk of symptomatic Covid and hospitalization), and Acharya et al. (no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with Delta) collectively reveal the poor efficacy and even negative efficacy of the Covid vaccines. Levine-Tiefenbrun et al. reports that the viral load reduction effectiveness declines with time after vaccination, “significantly decreasing at 3 months after vaccination and effectively vanishing after about 6 months.”

As an example, the Swedish study (retrospective with 842,974 pairs (N=1,684,958) is of interest and particularly concerning for it shows that while the vaccine provides temporary protection against infection, the effectiveness declines steadily and researchers report “Vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 against infection waned progressively from 92% (95% CI, 92-93, P<0·001) at day 15-30 to 47% (95% CI, 39-55, P<0·001) at day 121-180, and from day 211 and onwards no effectiveness could be detected (23%; 95% CI, -2-41, P=0·07). The effectiveness waned slightly slower for mRNA-1273, being estimated to 59% (95% CI, 18-79) from day 181 and onwards. In contrast, effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was generally lower and waned faster, with no effectiveness detected from day 121 and onwards (-19%, 95% CI, -97-28), whereas effectiveness from heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 / mRNA was maintained from 121 days and onwards (66%; 95% CI, 41-80).”  Researchers contend that “Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic Covid-19 infection wanes progressively over time across all subgroups, but at different rate according to type of vaccine, and faster for men and older frail individuals.” 

A further example emerges from Ireland whereby reporting suggests that the Waterford city district has the State’s highest rate of Covid-19 infections, while the county also boasts the highest rate of vaccination in the Republic (99.7% vaccinated). Reports are that the U.S. Covid-19 deaths for 2021 surpassed the deaths from 2020, leading some to state that “more people have died from COVID-19 in 2021, with most adults vaccinated and nearly all seniors), than in 2020 when nobody was vaccinated.” 

Thus these nations that locked down and stayed that way are in a quandary for they do not know what to do now. If you open you will get surges in infection. Where is the money that was to go to hospital preparation? Did governments embezzle and steal and misappropriate the money for the hospitals that still remain not prepared? 

We have a lot of natural immunity in the US, e.g. near 65-70% of the population. The open states (those that did not lock down too long and too hard and opened quickly) will likely do very well with this Omicron or any new variant. This also is the power of natural immunity. 

And we need not forget the potency of the overlooked ‘innate’ immunity with the innate antibodies and innate natural killer cellular compartment. This innate response is particularly potent in children (our first line of defense against pathogens) and is what has spared children from Covid and how children typically stave off pathogens, especially young children still laying down immunological memory. 

Moreover, there is no reporting of increased virulence/lethality of this new Omicron variant. As yet this will remain the case based on Delta and prior variants. There are no guarantees but we operate based on risk and all things point to the same for this new variant. 

Just because there is a wave in SA does not mean that there will be waves in the US or Israel or other places with greater natural immunity. This was the prize of letting people enjoy day-to-day living. The nations that have ended lockdowns are likely to move past this new variant scare, and be fine. This is more of an overreaction by the WHO and governments and much ado about nothing. (read more)

Nov 26 (Reuters) – Novavax Inc said on Friday it had started working on a version of its COVID-19 vaccine to target the variant detected in South Africa and would have the shot ready for testing and manufacturing in the next few weeks.

The company’s COVID-19 shot contains an actual version of the virus’ spike protein that cannot cause disease but can trigger the immune system. The vaccine developer said it had started developing a spike protein specifically based on the known genetic sequence of the variant, B.1.1.529.

Novavax’s vaccine received its first emergency use approval earlier this month in Indonesia followed by the Philippines. Other vaccine developers, including Germany’s BioNTech SE and Johnson & Johnson, have said they are testing the effectiveness of their shots against the new variant, which is named Omicron by the World Health Organization (read more)

In North America, Canada will be “banning the entry of foreign nationals…that have traveled through southern Africa in the last 14 days,” due to the new coronavirus variant Omicron, Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos said at a news conference Friday. (link)  And right on cue the Biden administration joins the effort:

WHITE HOUSE – “This morning I was briefed by my chief medical advisor, Dr. Tony Fauci, and the members of our COVID response team, about the Omicron variant, which is spreading through Southern Africa. As a precautionary measure until we have more information, I am ordering additional air travel restrictions from South Africa and seven other countries. These new restrictions will take effect on November 29. As we move forward, we will continue to be guided by what the science and my medical team advises.” (more)

As if on cue, this happens:

The discovery of a new Covid-19 variant sent oil plummeting 13% on Friday, as investors feared a wave of new government restrictions and slower economic growth. 

US crude finished the day at a two-month low of $68.15 a barrel, down 13.1% from Wednesday’s close. It was the worst day for oil since April 27, 2020, when Covid was spreading rapidly in the US. (link)

Under this type of economic manipulation using science, the U.S. federal government -and the multinational governments as a whole- recapture control of inflation.

As you know, the monetary policy to maintain an economic system beneficial to Wall Street and the multinational investment class means they need to keep interest rates low even as they print more money vis-à-vis the Build Back Better spending operation.  {Go Deep} The primary way to control inflation is for central banks (U.S. Fed) to stop purchasing their own debt and/or raise interest rates.  However, that approach would be against the interests of the multinational elites and international finance system (World Economic Forum agenda).

If you are a member of the political elite and worried about the electoral backlash from massively rising prices hitting your citizenry, another way to stop inflation is to shut down economic demand.

How do you shut down global economic demand….  Omicron !!

See how that works?

As a result, we enter the 2022 mid-term election under a scenario where a new variant of COVID, Omicron, is now the reason for government rules (Vaxx, Vaxx, Vaxx), a slowed economy and a contraction of demand.   Omicron becomes a justification and excuse for lowered economic expectations.

Simultaneously, inflation is artificially paused by using Omicron as a pressure relief valve, and the central bankers don’t have to worry about negative consequences to the multinational corporations who give them instructions.

Under this strategy, the electorate can be duped into reinstalling political ideologues, elites and communists.   And guess what?  The U.S. Energy Secretary doesn’t need to know what the price of a barrel of oil costs.

Don’t blame me, we just see this COVID variant stuff for what it is…. useful. (read more)

That’s how the attack that killed six people and injured more than 60 others is being described by ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Newsweek and others. Not an intentional attack, not a massacre allegedly committed by a violent career criminal already facing multiple felony charges, but merely a crash. The New York Times is calling it a “tragedy.”

Not to be outdone by major news outlets, The Daily Beast rushed to remind its readers that “there are no indications of any additional motive for the Waukesha killings, or any reasons to label it domestic terrorism. That didn’t stop these right-wing trolls.”

Oh no we wouldn’t want to assign ideological motives to a case too soon. But these damn right-wing trolls sure will! No mention from the Beast, of course, of the worst possible example of that in the Kyle Rittenhouse case, which every major news organization gladly went along with.

Again, this has been used multiple times. This is not an accident. pic.twitter.com/G726Roezwj

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) November 24, 2021

Here’s the thing. The next time you read an article in the New York Times or the Atlantic, watch a bit of breaking news on MSNBC or a panel on CNN, or hear a report on NPR, your default assumption should be that what you are reading, watching, or hearing is not true. Either it is an outright falsehood, a distortion of the facts, or not the whole story. That should be your posture toward literally every piece of news you consume from corporate media from now on.

There is ample justification for such a posture. It’s justified by every single major news story in recent years — the Russia collusion hoax, the origins of the pandemic, the [Only] Black Lives Matter riots, Hunter Biden’s laptop, the debate over Covid vaccines, the January 6 riot, and especially the Rittenhouse trial, to name just a few. Every one of these stories, and many more besides, were dishonestly reported by a corrupt media establishment that you should never trust again.

Consider the Rittenhouse trial. How many times in recent weeks did you hear that Rittenhouse “crossed state lines” with an “illegal firearm”? Or that his mother drove him to Kenosha, Wis., that night? Or that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist and the men he shot were black? How many times did you hear that the Kenosha riot was over the police “killing” of an “unarmed” black man, Jacob Blake?

You probably heard all of that, a lot. We all did. None of it is true. The corporate press lied incessantly about nearly every little detail of the Rittenhouse case, and it was aided in that deception by Big Tech, which has also forfeited any presumption of trust by its users.

In the immediate aftermath of the Kenosha riots last summer, Facebook proclaimed that Kyle Rittenhouse had committed “mass murder,” blocked all searches of his name, and censored all “praise or support” for him, including links to fundraising sites contributing to his defense. Eventually, fundraising sites like PayPal and GoFundMe did the same.

Facebook wasn’t alone. Before Rittenhouse’s trial, Twitter censored and suspended users who dared to say the teenager hadn’t done anything wrong and acted in self-defense. After a jury acquitted Rittenhouse on all counts, confirming that indeed he did nothing wrong and acted in self-defense, Twitter continued to censor users and suspend accounts that declared Rittenhouse’s innocence, even though it was now a matter of judgment in a court of law, not opinion or speculation.

Big Tech’s official position, long before the trial, was that Rittenhouse was guilty. For Twitter, at least, Rittenhouse remains guilty in some sense, despite his acquittal on all charges. If you wanted to post about the case on these platforms, there was only one opinion you were allowed to have.

It was the same with The New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story last year. Twitter banned the Post over it, suspending its account and demanding the paper delete all tweets about the story, which turned out to be completely true, as the Post insisted it was and as Hunter’s former busines partner Tony Bobulinski confirmed at the time.

Regardless, most corporate outlets worked to suppress the story until the election was over. Only this past September did Politico admit the story was true. Yet The New York Times continued to call it “unsubstantiated” before quietly deleting the false claim amid pushback.

It is the same with nearly every major issue in every major news cycle. During the gubernatorial election in Virginia, where the influence of critical race theory on public school curricula became a flashpoint in the race, we heard over and over from corporate outlets and talking heads that, actually, critical race theory isn’t even taught in Virginia schools! Glenn Youngkin, they said, was simply lying. But of course they were the ones lying, along with Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe, whose lies cost him the election.

Once you notice what is happening, it is impossible to un-see it. Just this past weekend, a shocking report by The New York Times about how Hunter Biden helped a Chinese conglomerate secure a major cobalt mine in Congo was assiduously ignored by every major news network. The networks showed zero curiosity about President Biden’s son facilitating the purchase from an American company of one of the world’s richest cobalt mines in 2016, when Joe Biden was still vice president. Instead, ABC News hyped online Black Friday deals, while CBS and NBC News focused on LeBron James’ suspension.

On and on it goes. If the media are not [only] lying outright, they are distorting or ignoring major stories that undermine their preferred narratives. You won’t have to wait long for this to happen again. It will probably happen this week.

When it does, remember that this is what the corporate press has been doing for years now. They are not interesting in informing their readers and viewers, they are interested only in telling you what to think. That is their entire raison d’être.

And rest assured that if you do somehow end up with the wrong opinion, Big Tech will silence you. (read more)

The majority of governing board members for the American Association of School Librarians expressed that they believe the removal of alleged “pornographic images” from school libraries is akin to “book banning,” according to their social media posts.

The American Association of School Librarians (AASL) is a branch of the American Library Association that specifically serves primary and secondary schools. The AASL is at the forefront of a contentious debate among parents over whether books with pornographic images and sexual narratives belong in school libraries.

“Fun Home” is among the books considered “inappropriate” by some parents. The book shows images of oral sex and signs hanging in a bedroom that read “Lesbian Terrorist,” and “Keep Your God Off My Body.” (RELATED: Parents Against Pornographic Books Speak Out At Board Meeting Despite Threats)

A majority of the AASL’s Board of Directors posted online calling for all books to remain in school libraries. Several reposted claims that the removal of books is anti-LGBT and advocated for purchasing more books that tell stories about “underrepresented communities.”

Sylvia Knight Norton, the executive director of the AASL’s board, retweeted a post that read, “Is there anything more actual cancel culture than trying to get books banned from schools en masse because they make you feel uncomfortable or have a differing world view [sic]?”

Erika Long, the board’s secretary and treasurer, reposted a tweet that read, “I am so disgusted with this country.” She also retweeted a post that said “queer content” is not “pornographic.”

“Books with queer content aren’t inappropriate or pornographic. They’re books,” the tweet read. “Books belong in classrooms and school libraries. If a parent does not want his/her/their child to read a book, fine. But that parent has no right — no right — to say other kids cannot read those books.”

Long also retweeted that “School librarians do not purchase pornography for their collections.” (read more)

A Wednesday newsletter from The Atlantic urged readers to use Thanksgiving as an opportunity to “deprogram” their conservative relatives.

In May, The New York Times cited a poll in which “15 percent of Americans [said] they think that the levers of power are controlled by a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles.” I’m no statistician—in fact I’m barely able to add and subtract; https://t.co/Jhk9BcDcuE

— Molly Jong-Fast (@MollyJongFast) November 24, 2021

“Maybe you’ll plant the seed, sow just a little doubt about whatever Tucker Carlson is saying now,” Molly Jong-Fast wrote. “Or maybe you’ll need to report a relative to the FBI!”

Jong-Fast described Thanksgiving as an invariably disappointing day that does not live up to the “hallmark-movie fantasy.” Jong-Fast’s best Thanksgiving, she wrote, was the one she spent in rehab when she was 19.

The writer rejected the idea that Thanksgiving should be a time of niceties, gratitude and harmony. Instead, she argued, readers should turn the holiday into an opportunity to tell their “creepy uncle” to get the vaccine or tell their aunt that her news sources are biased and unreliable. Her readers may be the only ones to tell their anti-vax cousin that the vaccine won’t make her infertile, Jong-Fast explains.

She told readers that some of their family members likely “follow QAnon” and need to be educated at Thanksgiving about the COVID-19 vaccine’s safety or the authenticity of the 2020 election.

“I’ve done 43 Thanksgivings … I’m here to tell you Thanksgiving is terrible, and if you at least spend the time trying to deprogram your niece, you won’t be bored or depressed,” Jong-Fast wrote.

“It’s a humor piece,” Jong-Fast tweeted Wednesday in response to criticism of the piece. (read more)

“We have concluded this outcome is the best way to move forward,” President of ODU Brian O. Hemphill said. “We hope today’s action helps bring closure for our Monarch family. As we move forward, I encourage all members of the Monarch family to continue our efforts toward healing and civil discourse.”

Walker said his scholarship “aims to prevent child sexual abuse” and that his research was “mischaracterized by some in the media and online, partly on the basis of my trans identity.”

A statement from Old Dominion University. #ODU pic.twitter.com/XcuXr3zJlS

— Old Dominion University (@ODU) November 16, 2021

Walker’s book, “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity,” challenged “widespread assumptions that persons who are preferentially attracted to minors – often referred to as ‘pedophiles’ – are necessarily also predators or sex offenders.” (RELATED: Ex-Teacher Who Allegedly Asked Students To Touch Themselves In Front Of Class Charged With Over A Dozen Sex Crimes)

The book looks at the “lives of non-offending minor-attracted persons,” which is a term used to describe the group because it is less stigmatizing than a word like “pedophile,” Walker said in an interview with Prostasia Foundation, a non-profit that focuses on child protection along with an “evidence-based approach” to child sex abuse prevention, according to the site.

Walker said in a statement that “child sexual abuse is morally wrong and inexcusable crime.” (read more)