The Non-Viability Of Social Media

The test of whether a deceptive practice — or fraud, if its actionable — is material is whether or not disclosing it fairly and fully, on an antecedent basis, would cause a person to decline to participate in the first place. Consider how many traditional families would participate if it was disclosed that any content speaking against “drag shows for kids” or FOR traditonal Christian values would be suppressed in advance every time someone signed on.

Facebook’s family userbase would be a tiny fraction of what it is; most of those who believe in traditional Christian marriage and families would refuse to use it were they honest about that position up front.

Yes, its material, yes, its intentionally deceptive, and yes, all attempts to try to wordsmith around these facts rather than fix the actual problem are just additional lies taken by desperate individuals and firms who really, really don’t want the 90% of people who vehemently disagree with some or all of the above to throw up the middle finger and leave, destroying the value of the firm were they to have this entire list and “demotion” group in front of them on an antecedent basis every time they signed on. Instead they want you to believeFacebook is a place to post cute cat pictures when the real intent is to deliberately falsely represent what is “normal” behavior and expression in our society both to shape public opinion and get money from advertisers on the false claim that this is, in fact, what the public thinks at-large.

Oh by the way that goes double, triple, and probably even more when it comes to back-door nonsense such as the CIA, FBI and political parties interfering behind the scenes in platform content as well. (read more)