The Blog

2023-

2023-02-26 c
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION III

WHY DON'T QUALIFIED WHITE TEACHERS
STAY IN MOSTLY BLACK CLASSROOMS?

On Tuesday 2/21/23 a black 6’6” 270 pound student attacked a white teacher at Matanzas High School for taking away his Nintendo Switch during class. The student is seen kicking and punching the unconscious woman in the back and head around 15 times. When the student was escorted… https://t.co/hYXkKgi0mG pic.twitter.com/9RqozolFBZ

— Tom Hennessy (@Tomhennessey69) February 23, 2023

Even a six-year-old black boy who then shot a white teacher.

THE RESULT IS THAT UNQUALIFIED BLACK TEACHERS
WITH NEGLIGIBLE MATH ABILITY THEMSELVES END UP "TEACHING" BLACK KIDS WHO ARE GENETICALLY
UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND OR LEARN MATHEMATICS

Being a race realist, I would not expect the average child with only Sub-Saharan African genetics to comprehend or master mathematics. Sure, some of them (those with minimal Ghost Archaic a.k.a. Homo erectus DNA) could master arithmetic, though real world results prove otherwise.

23 Baltimore schools have zero students proficient in math, per state test results
https://districtadministration.com/23-baltimore-schools-have-zero-students-proficient-in-math-per-state-test-results/

The average IQ of a Sub-Saharan African has been estimated to be less than 70. African Americans with Caucasian DNA have an average IQ of 85. American Caucasians have an average IQ of 100. Jews and East Asians have even higher average intelligence quotients.

The mainstream media, academics, Hollywood and woke culture constantly tell blacks the cornerstone lie of American race relations: that all black shortcomings, social pathologies, disparate outcomes and inequality are entirely due to fictional racism or imaginary structural racism or non-existent systemic racism.

Worldwide, there is a very strong association between IQ and income. Those with the highest IQs have the highest incomes. Those with average IQs have average incomes. Those with the lowest IQs have the lowest incomes.

Criminality is also associated with low IQ.

Racism is not the cause of those disparities.

Some Sub-Saharan Africans have up to 19% ghost archaic DNA. Mathematics, grammar, logic and critical thinking are beyond their mental abilities. They are suited to a nomadic or hunter-gatherer existence. Their ancestors never invented the wheel or an alphabet or mathematics or domesticated animals.

How does modern society accommodate the Homo erectus hybrids in our midst?

We do not have enough prison capacity and our economy doesn't require that many aspiring young rappers.

$when you decolonize math$

VERY DEEP BLACK HISTORY

Neanderthals, Denisovans and bearers of the "ghost archaic DNA" (most likely a form of Homo erectus) became extinct, though some of their genes live on in the three distinct lineages of modern humans. Their demise occurred because they were not "fit" in the Darwinian sense. Survival of the fittest applies even to hominids and the genus Homo. I have theorized that Australian Aboriginals, Philippine Negritos and Sub-Saharan Africans survived into the historical period only because they were isolated by ocean or desert barriers from those with Neanderthal genetics.

The early Australians, like their progeny, would likely have been unable to build seaworthy vessels, maybe just log canoes. They also could have walked, waded or clung to trees dislodged by storms or tsunami from SE Asia across numerous islands to New Guinea and eventually to the Cape York Peninsula of northern Australia. This migration (or flight from attackers) could have taken hundreds of generations during the latest glacial period when sea level was about five hundred feet lower and later they became landlocked as sea level rose.

The eventual Sub-Saharan Africans probably came south along the Atlantic coast during the Eemian Interglacial from the Iberian Peninsula (where much older stone tools have been found). The Eemian was warmer and more hospitable to early man than the Holocene, our current interglacial. With the coming of glaciation, aridity returned to block that route. I surmise they interbred with the existing African population that contributed the "ghost archaic DNA". The much older "ghost archaic" DNA population diverged from our family tree before the separation of Homo sapiens sapiens from Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. I tentatively call them a form derived from Homo erectus.

The Neanderthal admixture produced humans with advantages, including larger brains and better immune systems. Unlike the Australians and Africans, they eventually became agriculturists and domesticated animals. They invented the wheel and could count beyond 3 or 5. They also invented writing.

The Neanderthal admixture humans would have out-competed the Australian Aboriginals as well as the Sub-Saharan Africans, just like they out-competed Neanderthals and Denisovans and Homo floresiensis from Indonesia (and the bearers of "ghost archaic" DNA if they had encountered them).

It bears repeating that no humans outside of Sub-Saharan Africa had "ghost archaic DNA." Australian Aboriginals do not have any trace of that admixture. Also, no ancient Sub-Saharan Africans had any Neanderthal genetics. The three human lineages have been distinct for a long time.

Caucasians are not descended from Sub-Saharan Africans. The Out-of-Africa or African Eve theories of human origins were debunked years ago:

Not only is race real, our biological/genetic differences go far beyond race and are best described as specific or subspecific differences. Yes, that statement makes many uncomfortable, but facts are facts. Modern humans are best understood as belonging to three distinct genetic lineages:

1. those with Neanderthal admixture - Europeans and Asians
2. those with Denisovan admixture - Australian Aboriginals, Philippine Negritos
3. those with "ghost archaic DNA" admixture - Sub-Saharan Africans

Sub-Saharan Africans, on average, have an I.Q. below 70, limited impulse control, are unable to engage in abstract thinking and lack what is called, "a life of the mind." These traits are most pronounced in those with the highest percentage (up to 19%) of "ghost archaic DNA." While Sub-Saharan Africans' counting was limited to 1, 2 and "many," 3,700 years ago Babylonians used trigonometry and what would later be called the Pythagorean Theorem.

______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL,
______________________