Of course they don't say it this way, but they did admit it.

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccines to simplify the vaccination schedule for most individuals. This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses administered to individuals 6 months of age and older, including for an additional dose or doses for certain populations. The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the United States.

"No longer authorized" = dangerous and/or ineffective.

The "bivalent" is now one shot, not two or more, for most everyone.

But that's not even the whole story.

You see, there's no evidence the bivalent shot has any efficacy against Omicron, which it was allegedly reformulated to address, at all. Zero. In fact, the study that got them "approved" under EUA showed basically nothing.

Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.

Why did the strategy for significantly increasing BA.4 and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine fail? The most likely explanation is imprinting. The immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5. 

In other words you got it or got the original jab and thus trying to continually "boost" will do nothing of value because the response is wrong; you trained your immune system with an extinct series and now trying to "add to the protection" adds to that instead of what you want to target.  I pointed out that this was very likely before it all started for the specific reasons that "S" mutates rapidly and vaccination does nothing to generate "N" recognition, which is highly-conserved across mutations simply because it has to be otherwise the virus ceases to be a virus.

In addition there is more -- since there is only one dose recommended even for unvaccinated people if you got Pfizered the  "new dose" is one half of the previous.  But Moderna cut the total dose in half, so in that case its 25% of the original.  These are not small decreases.

Further, the FDA is giving up on "go get a shot every three months" as well, and this may be the biggest change of all.

Remember the FDA's original rationale for this: Your immunity, if you got infected and recovered, was going to disappear in three months.

Really?

How come over 500 days after I got infected even a cheap finger-stick linear flow antibody test, which costs about $1 to make by the way, shows I still have antibodies?  I've never been jabbed and never will be, so it can't be from "vaccination"; my immunity and recognition has to be from being infected.  Further, unlike those who got jabbed that recognition has thus far prevented reinfected entirely, and that is almost-certainly because I have "N" protein recognition and that part of the virus is conserved across mutations.

There's much-worse news too -- since we now know that the jabs neither prevent infection or transmission we've learned that many people who got jabbed also got continually reinfected, in some cases three, four or more times.  While I can't prove the jabs did this its highly likely that immune imprinting destroyed your capacity to build an effective "N" protein recognition particularly in the marrow and CD cells.  If this is durable (we do not know) then you're wasting your time taking boosters and in fact are harming yourself by doing so.

Point being this: The FDA has admitted, without saying it, they were full of crap.  Further, these are still EUA jabs, not "licensed" under full authorization, so can we cut the crap about how these "passed full regulatory standards" yet?  We're three years into this and the FDA is still lying and issuing approvals that do not meet the licensing standards which, I remind you, require 50% or better efficacy against infection on a durable basis.

Oh, and about the so-called "fully licensed" Comirnaty jab: Will you stop lying about that bullshit too eh?

While this doesn't prove the FDA's knowledge of where the suddenlies is coming from, well, when lied to once by a health provider and/or the FDA why would be so goddamned stupid as to ever listen to them again?

Unlike a video game you cannot "reset it" by depositing another $1 in the coinbox or pushing the "X" button on your controller.

And incidentally, if you want to understand why this was stupid and all about money damn the consequences here's a scoping review on the mRNA technology.  Note that the authors restate what I pointed out in early 2021 and which was known and not brought forward in December of 2020 before any of the jabs went into arms -- the spike protein, in the circulation, is directly dangerous.  It was ridiculously false to suggest that this was "an acceptable risk" because we knew coronaviruses, including this one, only became viremic -- that is, the virus got into the circulation -- in severe and fatal cases and we also knew most Covid-19 cases were not severe and thus not viremic.

We thus knew before the jabs started that the jabs would inevitably expose you to a risk of serious (or even fatal) injury that most of the time an infection did not expose you to, and there was no way to give an injection while avoiding that as it happens to some degree each and every time you give someone an injection of anything.

Further, "warp speed" rather than the full set of testing, which would have disclosed these infirmities before use committed two frauds up on the public generally and nobody has been held accountable for this.

For example, the dual assumptions that LNPs remain at the injection site, and that the mRNA degrades quickly, have been demonstrated to be false; biodistribution and bioaccumulation data indicate that LNPs can enter the bloodstream [53], and studies have shown the durability of both mRNA and spike protein in vivo 2 months after injection [61]. Another study found circulating spike protein 4 months post-injection [62].

We were all told neither of these things were true; those claims were lies.  They were made without evidence and the first was known very rapidly as Japan required a biodistribution study, it was done and then when the falsehood was exposed not used as cause to revoke all the EUAs immediately.  A fundamental premise on which approval was made that is then proved false and yet the product remains on the market and in use is fraud.  The people in both the FDA and the manufacturers should all be executed as having committed murder for everyone who died as a consequence once that biodistribution study was done.  Every single one of said persons is personally culpable and has in fact killed those individuals because the claim they used to establish "safety" was, at a scientific level of evidence, proved false.

This paper also provides a damning piece of evidence that this was intentional:

Prior to the trials on COVID-19 vaccines involving tens of thousands of people, public data exist on only 285 patients administered various mRNA vaccines, with the earliest trials finishing in 2018 and exhibiting high rates (>10%) of severe adverse events (Supplementary Table S1).

In 2018 they knew ten percent of the people in a tiny mRNA vaccine study had severe adverse events.  That was the end of that because the attempt seriously injured one in ten of people it was given to.

It gets worse.  Class-shifting is a function of the narrow response and is now documented.  This was not known when the mass-jabbing started but it is known now, and its serious in that it can wildly accelerate cancer development and make pregnancy difficult or even impossible.

Recent evidence revealed a subclass switch from IgG1 to IgG4 in the context of the Comirnaty mRNA product, which may have consequences with regard to cancer [108], pregnancy [109], and IgG4-related diseases 

This damage is likely permanent and, once again, it was directly due to "use in mass quantities before we know" that led to it.  If you got nailed by this, and nobody is looking on a mass-population basis to find out how often this happens, you're screwed.

The paper also points out what I stated back in 2020 when this garbage was first in development: All previous attempts to vaccinate against coronaviruses have failed and all have produced either immune tolerance, direct damage to the body or worse, enhancement of the disease on later challenge.  While some veterinary coronavirus vaccines are used despite rapidly-waning efficacy most attempts have failed and been forced off the market and of those that have not the lack of durable efficacy is known against all.

In other words, if you want it in the short version: They don't work.

The FDA, in short continues this charade, an intentional and outrageous fraud, by repeatedly issuing EUA "approvals" for products that do not meet the formal definitions of both safety and efficacy for actual licensure in the United States.  It is no longer a matter of "unknowns" and in addition three years down the road there is no longer any excuse for this.

This agency must be destroyed and everyone involved in this scam held criminally to account along with stripping of immunity from any actor who tries this crap ever again.

Any politician or "public health" official who fails to immediately and permanently renounce what happened here, and guarantee via legislation and stripping of legal immunity that it will never happen again must be ejected from public life, all authority and be destroyed both politically and economically.

That's being kind, by the way -- which is no longer either owed or earned.