WELCOME |
![]() |
![]() comments, ephemera, speculation, etc. (protected political speech and personal opinion) 2023- 2023-06-08 a OUR BOLSHEVIK-OCCUPIED GOVERNMENT THE
DC DEMONS ARE INDICTING TRUMP BECAUSE THEY
ARE TERRIFIED HE WILL WIN THE PRESIDENCY
FOR A THIRD TIME & HIS MARGIN OF
VICTORY WOULD REQUIRE EVEN MORE EXTENSIVE
(& OBVIOUS) CHEATING.
Supreme Court decision,
Navy v.
Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988), makes
it impossible
*for the DC DEMONS to get a conviction in a fair legal proceeding. They know he would destroy the Deep State in his next term. BREAKING:
Biden DOJ notifies President Trump that he
will be indicted next week. DOJ declines
to delay charges to allow an investigation
into witness tampering.
Watch LIVE https://t.co/aeKhZCtVbe Watch more #HumanEventsDaily with @JackPosobiec: https://t.co/mqycexhUJo pic.twitter.com/VB41RKdP1v — Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) June 7, 2023 *BREAKING
Signed letter from President Trump on Jan 19, 2021, the day before he left office, declassifying “Crossfire Hurricane” docs showing Obama, Biden, the CIA, DOJ, and FBI spied on him Now you know why they raided Mar a Lago To steal back evidence of their crimes pic.twitter.com/PSiRXc9Mbx — DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) June 7, 2023 ** * * * *
* * * * * * * * .@realDonaldTrump .@realDonaldTrump
· SHOCKING! ONE OF THE TOP PROSECUTORS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF INJUSTICE WAS REPORTEDLY SO OBSESSED WITH “GETTING TRUMP” THAT HE TRIED TO BRIBE & INTIMIDATE A LAWYER REPRESENTING SOMEONE BEING TARGETED & HARASSED TO FALSELY ACCUSE & FABRICATE A STORY ABOUT PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP & A CRIME THAT DOESN’T EXIST. THIS CRIMINAL & SALACIOUS ACT FROM WITHIN THE DOJ HAS BROUGHT SHAME & EMBARRASSMENT TO THIS ONCE GREAT & RESPECTED INSTITUTION. BECAUSE OF THIS, THERE IS NOW EXTREME TURMOIL INSIDE THE DOJ….. * See also: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/06/debunking_another_false_claim_that_trump_violated_national_security_law.html
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/06/07/pollak-indicting-a-former-president-over-nonsense-is-playing-with-fire/ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/22/sources-gsa-packed-boxes-documents-trump-took-mar-a-lago-not-political-staffers/ https://dcenquirer.com/breaking-report-reveals-the-biden-justice-department-has-told-trump-he-will-be-indicted-next-week/ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyc-prosecutor-trump-indictment-matt-gaetz-contempt-congress https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-indictment-espionage-prosecution-charges-b2353397.html https://www.justsecurity.org/86845/pending-supreme-court-case-complicates-special-counsel-smiths-choices/ https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/feds-inform-trump-he-target-likely-be-indicted-doj-rebuffs https://leesmith.locals.com/post/4077763/the-ugly-history-of-the-doj-hatchet-man-tasked-to-target-trump So About Trump's Second Indictment https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=249015 https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/alan-dershowitz-donald-trump-indictment/2023/06/08/id/1122884/ https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/ric-grenell-donald-trump-jack-smith/2023/06/01/id/1122063/ https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/08/us/trump-indictment-documents#justice-department-charges-trump-in-documents-case https://slaynews.com/news/mark-meadows-flips-on-trump-agrees-to-plead-guilty-to-federal-charges-in-exchange-for-immunity-deal-report/ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/06/andrew-weissmann-celebrates-pending-federal-indictment-of-trump-after-writing-main-justice-memorandum-for-lisa-monaco-to-use/ * Here’s the
“tell” that every pundit, analyst and
litigation expert will pretend they don’t
notice. It’s the funniest part of
the entire thing and yet no one, again
except us, is noticing it. The DOJ
has already predicated the baseline of
their claim by saying they cannot tell
anyone, even the court, what the nature of
the documents are that underpin their
assertion. Remember, they wouldn’t
even let a court appointed “special
master” review the documents.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/07/jack-smith-andrew-weissmann-and-lisa-monacos-novel-theory-us-code-793-to-prosecute-trump-it-wont-work/Stop and think about that for a moment. NO ONE knows what the documents are, and the DOJ has stated they will never say what the documents are. The DOJ is filing a case about the mishandling of documents, in whatever legal construct they put forth, while simultaneously saying they are under no obligation to tell anyone what the documents are. * https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/07/reminder-what-was-in-the-mar-a-lago-documents/ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/08/greg-kelly-outlines-the-get-trump-weaponization-scheme-behind-nara/ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/08/transparently-political-president-trump-announces-his-indictment-in-federal-court-in-miami-by-biden-appointed-special-counsel-jack-smith/ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/08/who-is-really-conducting-the-jack-smith-prosecution-of-trump-lawfares-andrew-weissmann-and-norm-eisen/ https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4036620-jim-jordan-seeks-memo-on-smith-appointment-as-mar-a-lago-probe-winds-down/amp/ https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2023/06/mark-meadows-has-agreed-to-a-plea-bargain-as-part-of-immunity-deal-for-testimony-against-trump-report/ https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1666562454984220672.html https://tippinsights.com/5-reasons-why-merrick-garland-must-stop-lawfare-against-trump/ * One perhaps
may accept this as a general proposition
of administrative law, but the proposition
is not without limit, and it runs aground
when it encounters concerns of national
security, as in this case, where the grant
of security clearance to a particular
employee, a sensitive and inherently
discretionary judgment call, is committed
by law to the appropriate agency of the
Executive Branch. The
President, after all, is the “Commander in Chief
of the Army and Navy of the United States.”
U.S.Const., Art. II, § 2. His authority to
classify and control access to information bearing
on national security and to determine whether an
individual is sufficiently trustworthy to occupy a
position in the Executive Branch that will give
that person access to such information flows
primarily from this constitutional investment of
power in the President, and exists quite apart
from any explicit congressional grant. See Cafeteria
Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.
S. 886,
367 U.
S. 890
(1961). This Court has recognized the Government’s
“compelling interest” in withholding national
security information from unauthorized persons in
the course of executive business. Snepp v. United
States, 444 U.
S. 507,
444 U.
S. 509,
n. 3 (1980). See also United States v. Robel, 389 U.
S. 258,
389 U.
S. 267
(1967); United
States v. Reynolds, 345 U.
S. 1,
345 U.
S. 10
(1953); Totten
v. United States, 92 U.
S. 105,
92 U.
S. 106
(1876). The authority to
protect such information falls on the President as
head of the Executive Branch and as Commander in
Chief.
Navy v. Egan
484 US 518 (1988)* https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/miami-grand-jury-trump-classified-documents/ https://news.yahoo.com/prosecutors-ready-ask-trump-indictment-193915222.html https://www.zerohedge.com/political/comey-imagine-retribution-presidency-where-president-ordered-investigation-and ______________________ Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL, ______________________ |
...
News and facts for
those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio
version of reality.
|
|||||
|
If
you let them redefine words, they will control
language. If you let them control language, they will control thoughts. If you let them control thoughts, they will control you. They will own you. |
© 2020 - 2021 - thenotimes.com - All Rights Reserved |