The Blog

2023-

2023-08-02 a
BOLSHEVIK-OCCUPIED WASHINGTON IV

BOLSHEVIKS & THEIR GREAT RESET &
NEW WORLD ORDER CABALS ARE DESPERATE.
THEY HAVE READ THE WRITING ON THE WALL.
We expect unprecedented brutality, censorship & tyranny from the Khazar Bolsheviks in the following year and one half.

The timing of these Trump indictments is insane.

Notice how they all came immediately after Bombshells about The Biden Crime Family?

pic.twitter.com/TwZsh0VsHb

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 2, 2023

U.S. District Judge Tanya S Chutkan is an Obama appointee. She has sentenced Jan 6th defendants to longer sentences than the government recommended. And now, she is the judge in the case of President Trump’s indictment over J6.

This is not fair to Donald Trump. It’s unethical.

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) August 2, 2023

This was such a brazenly political—and largely irrelevant to the matter—statement.

Nervous, disheveled, and petty sounding.

Probably unemployable anywhere outside of DC. pic.twitter.com/BNPVkbGMrp

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) August 2, 2023

45 pages of retread J6 committee garbage, free speech, and ESP like assumptions.https://t.co/Wk0we4gqK2

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) August 2, 2023

Page 32 of the indictment begins a section where it is claimed the Vice President had no authority to disqualify electors.

Q: If that is true, why did the law about this process need to be ammended in 2022?

A: Because in 2021 the VP had the power.https://t.co/UXLu7HXrKH pic.twitter.com/gDT5zbbpNh

— Brick Suit (@Brick_Suit) August 1, 2023

The Trump case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, according to the court docket. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is the only federal judge in Washington, D.C., who has sentenced Jan. 6 defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested.

— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) August 1, 2023

That’s the same Tanya Chutkan who represented Theranos at Boies Schiller (the firm that hired Fusion GPS to attack Theranos whistleblowers) and then presided as judge in the U.S. House lawsuit against Fusion GPS. Completely corrupt. https://t.co/3HvYcuBe3B

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) August 1, 2023

Free speech has been indicted. Read this section of the indictment.

It acknowledges that Trump has the right to say, even falsely, the results were fraudulent and claim he won the election. That’s protected by the First Amendment.

But the indictment says he can’t lie about… pic.twitter.com/tKDBP93j3Z

— Will Cain (@willcain) August 1, 2023

Here is Van Jones on CNN explaining how candidates are legally allowed to contest elections pic.twitter.com/LcmHtboZjW

— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) August 1, 2023

The 2020 election was rigged and they’re trying to throw Trump in prison before the 2024 election because they’re not confident they’ll be able to rig that one.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) August 1, 2023

Special Counsel Jack Smith Unseals Criminal Indictment of President Trump for Protesting Results of [Fraudulent] 2020 Election

Special Counsel Jack Smith held a press conference today following the unsealing of a federal criminal indictment alleging four counts against President Donald J Trump. [Full Indictment pdf Link]

The four alleged criminal counts are: (1) Conspiracy to defraud the U.S Government; (2) Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; (3) Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; and (4) Conspiracy against Rights.

Interestingly, nowhere in the indictment is anything criminally alleged relating to the January 6, 2021, events at the U.S. Capitol building in Washington DC. However, you will notice in the Lawfare delivery of the remarks, Special Counsel Jack Smith factually speaks almost exclusively of the January 6th events.

The absence of a criminal charge (ie. seditious conspiracy or insurrection) when contrast against the extreme verbal emphasis of the event as outlined by Smith in the presser, will be missed by most. Speaking of the non-criminal event as the context for a fabricated/stretched criminal allegation, is Lawfare in action. Why emphasize but not charge? Because the DOJ/FBI does not want the risk of litigated discovery and evidence of coordinated government activity therein, that’s why.

Jack Smith knows he is out on a limb with his Lawfare effort to criminalize the legal and constitutional challenge to an election outcome. He is nervous, WATCH.

The brighter the sunlight falling upon government corruption and weaponization, the more those who perpetrate corruption and weaponization will have to shield against it.

At this point in history these attacks against President Donald Trump are Lawfare members sticking fingers and toes into the cracks of a justice dam that is increasingly unstable and about to collapse. The pressure on the other side is the dam is the collective anger of We The People, and when that dam breaks no pre-positioned scuba gear is going to protect them. (read more)

See also: https://technofog.substack.com/p/analysis-the-trump-dc-indictment

______________________

Permission is hereby granted to any and all to copy and paste any entry on this page and convey it electronically along with its URL,
______________________