Of course they don't say it this way, but they did admit it.

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccines to simplify the vaccination schedule for most individuals. This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses administered to individuals 6 months of age and older, including for an additional dose or doses for certain populations. The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the United States.

"No longer authorized" = dangerous and/or ineffective.

The "bivalent" is now one shot, not two or more, for most everyone.

But that's not even the whole story.

You see, there's no evidence the bivalent shot has any efficacy against Omicron, which it was allegedly reformulated to address, at all. Zero. In fact, the study that got them "approved" under EUA showed basically nothing.

Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the Journal.

Why did the strategy for significantly increasing BA.4 and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine fail? The most likely explanation is imprinting. The immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2. They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5. 

In other words you got it or got the original jab and thus trying to continually "boost" will do nothing of value because the response is wrong; you trained your immune system with an extinct series and now trying to "add to the protection" adds to that instead of what you want to target.  I pointed out that this was very likely before it all started for the specific reasons that "S" mutates rapidly and vaccination does nothing to generate "N" recognition, which is highly-conserved across mutations simply because it has to be otherwise the virus ceases to be a virus.

In addition there is more -- since there is only one dose recommended even for unvaccinated people if you got Pfizered the  "new dose" is one half of the previous.  But Moderna cut the total dose in half, so in that case its 25% of the original.  These are not small decreases.

Further, the FDA is giving up on "go get a shot every three months" as well, and this may be the biggest change of all.

Remember the FDA's original rationale for this: Your immunity, if you got infected and recovered, was going to disappear in three months.

Really?

How come over 500 days after I got infected even a cheap finger-stick linear flow antibody test, which costs about $1 to make by the way, shows I still have antibodies?  I've never been jabbed and never will be, so it can't be from "vaccination"; my immunity and recognition has to be from being infected.  Further, unlike those who got jabbed that recognition has thus far prevented reinfected entirely, and that is almost-certainly because I have "N" protein recognition and that part of the virus is conserved across mutations.

There's much-worse news too -- since we now know that the jabs neither prevent infection or transmission we've learned that many people who got jabbed also got continually reinfected, in some cases three, four or more times.  While I can't prove the jabs did this its highly likely that immune imprinting destroyed your capacity to build an effective "N" protein recognition particularly in the marrow and CD cells.  If this is durable (we do not know) then you're wasting your time taking boosters and in fact are harming yourself by doing so.

Point being this: The FDA has admitted, without saying it, they were full of crap.  Further, these are still EUA jabs, not "licensed" under full authorization, so can we cut the crap about how these "passed full regulatory standards" yet?  We're three years into this and the FDA is still lying and issuing approvals that do not meet the licensing standards which, I remind you, require 50% or better efficacy against infection on a durable basis.

Oh, and about the so-called "fully licensed" Comirnaty jab: Will you stop lying about that bullshit too eh?

While this doesn't prove the FDA's knowledge of where the suddenlies is coming from, well, when lied to once by a health provider and/or the FDA why would be so goddamned stupid as to ever listen to them again?

Unlike a video game you cannot "reset it" by depositing another $1 in the coinbox or pushing the "X" button on your controller.

And incidentally, if you want to understand why this was stupid and all about money damn the consequences here's a scoping review on the mRNA technology.  Note that the authors restate what I pointed out in early 2021 and which was known and not brought forward in December of 2020 before any of the jabs went into arms -- the spike protein, in the circulation, is directly dangerous.  It was ridiculously false to suggest that this was "an acceptable risk" because we knew coronaviruses, including this one, only became viremic -- that is, the virus got into the circulation -- in severe and fatal cases and we also knew most Covid-19 cases were not severe and thus not viremic.

We thus knew before the jabs started that the jabs would inevitably expose you to a risk of serious (or even fatal) injury that most of the time an infection did not expose you to, and there was no way to give an injection while avoiding that as it happens to some degree each and every time you give someone an injection of anything.

Further, "warp speed" rather than the full set of testing, which would have disclosed these infirmities before use committed two frauds up on the public generally and nobody has been held accountable for this.

For example, the dual assumptions that LNPs remain at the injection site, and that the mRNA degrades quickly, have been demonstrated to be false; biodistribution and bioaccumulation data indicate that LNPs can enter the bloodstream [53], and studies have shown the durability of both mRNA and spike protein in vivo 2 months after injection [61]. Another study found circulating spike protein 4 months post-injection [62].

We were all told neither of these things were true; those claims were lies.  They were made without evidence and the first was known very rapidly as Japan required a biodistribution study, it was done and then when the falsehood was exposed not used as cause to revoke all the EUAs immediately.  A fundamental premise on which approval was made that is then proved false and yet the product remains on the market and in use is fraud.  The people in both the FDA and the manufacturers should all be executed as having committed murder for everyone who died as a consequence once that biodistribution study was done.  Every single one of said persons is personally culpable and has in fact killed those individuals because the claim they used to establish "safety" was, at a scientific level of evidence, proved false.

This paper also provides a damning piece of evidence that this was intentional:

Prior to the trials on COVID-19 vaccines involving tens of thousands of people, public data exist on only 285 patients administered various mRNA vaccines, with the earliest trials finishing in 2018 and exhibiting high rates (>10%) of severe adverse events (Supplementary Table S1).

In 2018 they knew ten percent of the people in a tiny mRNA vaccine study had severe adverse events.  That was the end of that because the attempt seriously injured one in ten of people it was given to.

It gets worse.  Class-shifting is a function of the narrow response and is now documented.  This was not known when the mass-jabbing started but it is known now, and its serious in that it can wildly accelerate cancer development and make pregnancy difficult or even impossible.

Recent evidence revealed a subclass switch from IgG1 to IgG4 in the context of the Comirnaty mRNA product, which may have consequences with regard to cancer [108], pregnancy [109], and IgG4-related diseases 

This damage is likely permanent and, once again, it was directly due to "use in mass quantities before we know" that led to it.  If you got nailed by this, and nobody is looking on a mass-population basis to find out how often this happens, you're screwed.

The paper also points out what I stated back in 2020 when this garbage was first in development: All previous attempts to vaccinate against coronaviruses have failed and all have produced either immune tolerance, direct damage to the body or worse, enhancement of the disease on later challenge.  While some veterinary coronavirus vaccines are used despite rapidly-waning efficacy most attempts have failed and been forced off the market and of those that have not the lack of durable efficacy is known against all.

In other words, if you want it in the short version: They don't work.

The FDA, in short continues this charade, an intentional and outrageous fraud, by repeatedly issuing EUA "approvals" for products that do not meet the formal definitions of both safety and efficacy for actual licensure in the United States.  It is no longer a matter of "unknowns" and in addition three years down the road there is no longer any excuse for this.

This agency must be destroyed and everyone involved in this scam held criminally to account along with stripping of immunity from any actor who tries this crap ever again.

Any politician or "public health" official who fails to immediately and permanently renounce what happened here, and guarantee via legislation and stripping of legal immunity that it will never happen again must be ejected from public life, all authority and be destroyed both politically and economically.

That's being kind, by the way -- which is no longer either owed or earned.

Law enforcement recovered numerous documents from Hale's vehicle and bedroom, showing that she was "planning over a period of months to commit mass murder at The Covenant School." Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director David Rausch explained that "one is specifically a plan and the other is some journal-type rantings."

[Illegitimate] President Joe Biden may open a welcome center for global migrants in the South American country of Colombia, according to a report in the Washington Post.

The wage-cutting migrants would be processed and then flown into the U.S. for jobs and homes that would otherwise be filled by Americans, including sidelined Americans.

The revelations come as Biden’s pro-migration officials are preparing to lift the Title 42 barrier for the roughly 600,000 waiting migrants in Mexico. That waiting population is roughly equivalent to one migrant for every six births in 2023.

The Washington Post reported April 21:

Biden officials have discussed establishing processing centers in Guatemala and Colombia for asylum seekers, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal deliberations.

The plan matches the administration’s strategy of redirecting cartel-managed illegal migration through government-run “processing centers” and quasi-legal loopholes in the nation’s border laws.

This loophole strategy has been used to welcome more than 4 million migrants over the Mexican border — and many more white-collar migrants via airports — amid minimal coverage on the evening TV shows.

Another platoon of military-aged Chinese men headed toward the United States.

China is slowly invading America without firing a single shot.

This is another group waiting to board buses to Costa Rica to continue to the US.

The blurred faces are of 3 supposedly related Chinese… pic.twitter.com/aakyKgoRG6

— Muckraker.com (@realmuckraker) April 16, 2023

“This administration views immigration limits to be equivalent of Jim Crow [racist laws], and they [see themselves as] therefore heroic if they are undermining those immoral laws,” Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Immigration Studies, told Breitbart News. He added:

They see it as morally defensible to subvert the law if they consider the law to be immoral — and they consider … limits on immigration — regardless of what they are — to be morally wrong.

Congress’s 1990 immigration law sets legal immigration caps at roughly 1 million migrants per year. That very high cap delivers one migrant for every four U.S. births — not counting Mayorkas’ massive loophole inflow.

The South American loophole is being developed by Biden’s pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas. The Post reported:

“It is very important to build lawful pathways for individuals to be able to access humanitarian relief in the United States so that they do not need to take the dangerous journey to the United States,” Mayorkas said, describing the administration’s general approach. “Our model is to build lawful pathways and then to impose the consequences that the law provides on those who do not avail themselves of those pathways.”

A Florida judge has already barred one of Mayorkas’s smuggling routes. The Supreme Court is expected to decide the legality of a second major route by June.

In mid-April, Mayorkas announced a plan to temporarily reduce the rising flood of global migrants through the deadly Darien Gap jungle trail between South America and Central America.

However, that supposed 60-day enforcement plan was announced just as Mayorkas doubled his reception capacity for migrants at the northern exit of the jungle trail between Central and South America.

Biden is expected to lift the Title 42 border barrier on May 11. The policy will allow myriad economic migrants to use Mayorkas’ catch-and-release asylum loopholes to walk into the United States, despite the huge number of Americans who have been sidelined and impoverished by prior waves of migrants and free-trade outsourcing deals.

“I think next week we’ll have more to say about our preparation and some of the things we are going to be doing,” Mayorkas told establishment reporters at a meeting Thursday.

Mayorkas is zigzagging between pro-migration groups and the public.

For example, on Thursday, he met with sympathetic media outlets, such as the Hill, which reported:

Mayorkas said the department is considering a new rule to more easily deny asylum claims. Migrants who have not applied for asylum in other countries on their way to the U.S. or have crossed the border illegally would not be eligible for asylum.

But in March, he reassured pro-migration groups that the planned curbs would have many loopholes:

There are exceptions in the proposed rule. If one for example, has no access to CBP One [agency online portal] … if one is in imminent risk of danger by reason of the threat that one seeks to escape, [or] an acute vulnerability, an urgent medical or other humanitarian exemptions.

Almost 1 million migrants are living in Mexico, according to a United Nations document. Many of the migrants have reached Mexico because of economic aid provided by Mayorkas to international agencies. The funding comes from U.S. taxpayers, despite the public’s deep opposition to migration.

Most migrants come from Central America, but an increasing share is arriving from South American and far-away countries, such as Congo, Cameroon, India, and China. Each successful migrant uses their cell phone to advertise their success to more migrants, so creating more business for the criminal and the government-run networks.

Nationalities of migrants taken into CBP and Border Patrol custody at the US-Mexico border in the past 3 months.

– #Colombia is now #2
– #Peru is now 5th
– Largest number of migrants from India in a single month
– Applying Title 42 to a nationality doesn't mean its ranking drops pic.twitter.com/mMopQQAFY9

— Adam Isacson (@adam_wola) April 18, 2023

Mayorkas is a pro-migration zealot. who has said his border management is “all about achieving equity, which is really the core founding principle of our country.” Mayorkas’ demands imply equity between U.S. citizens and foreign citizens, and he has opened many loopholes for millions of economic migrants to cross into the United States.

Amid the massive inflow of roughly 2 million global economic migrants in 2022, Mayorkas insisted the border is “secure,” and rejected any criticism of his deadly, elite-backed wealth-shifting policies. (read more)

If I were still teaching at Harvard Business School, I’d already be putting together material for a case study on the Bud Light marketing disaster, and I am reasonably sure that I would have plenty of company at HBS and elsewhere. The fiasco is already of historic proportions, joining New Coke as an example of failing to understand the customers of a brand.

But, as with any good case study, there are layers and layers of analysis possible, and the initial hypotheses of who and what went wrong may yield to alternative views once more information is considered.

With its choice of Alissa Heinerscheid to be VP of marketing for Bud, AB InBev made waves in the industry by entrusting its top-selling brand to the marketing skills of a woman. The company, it turns out, is the exact opposite of a stodgy, tradition-bound merchandiser of a product so venerable that the ancient Egyptians consumed it.  Just last month, the company became the first in history to win the title “Creative Marketer of the Year” two years in a row at the world’s biggest ad festival, The Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity (formerly the International Advertising Festival) Marketer of the Year

16 March 2023

The world’s largest brewer is awarded for a second consecutive year, the only brand to achieve this in the history of the Festival.

Cannes Lions has announced that it will honour Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev) as Creative Marketer of the Year for a second year in a row. The award recognises AB InBev’s sustained creative excellence that has driven sustainable business growth – as well as their body of Lion-winning work amassed over a sustained period of time, and reputation for producing brave creative and innovative marketing solutions.

AB InBev is the first brand in the Festival’s history to be honoured with the award for two consecutive years after embedding creativity at the heart of their business. (snip)

 In 2018, AB InBev embarked on a journey to develop a creative excellence programme and set a five year strategic goal to improve their creative marketing capabilities and drive organic revenue for the business. 

This programme saw them introduce an embedded, sustainable system and culture that put creative problem solving at the centre of their business – leading to organic growth and improved creative and financial performance. (snip)

[Lions CEO Simon]Cook added, “AB InBev’s commitment to creativity and the role it plays in business value creation is further supported by the clear buy-in from the company board, including CEO Michel Doukeris, which has been critical to their success. They’ve also scaled, using the best practice established in the US as a blueprint for their approach across other markets. All of this has delivered incredible business results, and the fact that they now use the number and breadth of Lion wins as a core measure of success shows just how powerful creativity is in driving progress.”

So, when Ms. Heinerscheid made her now-infamous video scoffing at the “fratty” tendencies of existing Bud Light drinkers, she could well have understood that her mandate was to get creative about finding new ways to reach other consumer segments for a brand that all acknowledged was in long term decline.

Alissa Heinerscheid, Bud Light’s VP of Marketing, doubles down on her extreme woke strategy to promote the “declining” American beer brand to “young people”, while smearing her former customers as “fratty and out of touch”.

How’s that working out for you, lady? @budlight pic.twitter.com/zNYKbMnZnu

— Old Row (@OldRowOfficial) April 9, 2023

There is no evidence that anyone in the company found anything she said there objectionable.  Just over a week before the company half-heartedly “apologized” (sort of) for the Mulvaney tangent, The man who just replaced Heinerscheid was on CNBC kvelling over a remarkable award that must have pleased top management.
 

Bud Light’s VP of global marketing, Todd Allen, is very proud of Bud Light’s marketing strategy. pic.twitter.com/FRZ75RwXaM

— Mythinformed (@MythinformedMKE) April 22, 2023

Mark down Tuesday, April 4, as the night Chicago died.

That’s when we learned that Second City voters narrowly elected Brandon Johnson as their next mayor. This is a city that was flattened during the reign of Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who lost in the first round of voting for Chicago mayor because she didn’t finish in one of the top two spots. Lightfoot, elected in 2019 after a career as a federal prosecutor who then held several appointed positions in Chicago, shut down the city for more than a year during COVID-19. She also bankrupted small businesses, allowed rioters to burn down whole neighborhoods, presided over the worst crime wave in 50 years and let the schools go to hell.

Now, the voters have selected Johnson. Elected to the Cook County Board of Commissioners in 2018, Johnson narrowly won the mayoralty of America’s third-most-populous city on April 4 over Paul Vallas, a former Chicago schools CEO and a Democrat who presented himself as a political moderate compared to the far-left Johnson.

The incoming mayor may turn out to be a worse mayor than Lightfoot. Johnson’s occupation is an organizer for the teachers unions. The unions spent several million dollars on the race. They got their man.

What this means is that Chicago’s municipal government will now be a fully owned subsidiary of the Chicago Teachers Union. (Can you imagine what the union contracts are going to look like?) This is a city where, in roughly two dozen schools, zero children can read or write at proficiency level.

Johnson said that crime and shoplifting from local schools are societal problems. And he may continue Lightfoot’s policy of not prosecuting people who rob stores — often owned by minorities.

It’s not just Chicago that has become a war zone. Portland, Seattle and San Francisco were not so long ago the crown jewels of the West Coast. They were said to be progressive cities that worked. No more. Now, they are unlivable. San Francisco is overrun with homeless people on seemingly every downtown street corner, feces on the sidewalks and trash everywhere.

In Portland, major businesses are pulling out in the aftermath of the takeover of the radical anarchists during COVID-19. Crime is so rampant that Walmart recently said “adios,” shutting down its last store. Rains PDX, a clothing store in Portland, shut down last November after a string of break-ins made it impossible to stay open. This printed sign pasted on the door says it all:

“Small businesses (and large) cannot sustain doing business, in our city’s current state. We have no protection, or recourse, against the criminal behavior that goes unpunished. Do not be fooled into thinking that insurance companies cover losses. We have sustained 15 break-ins … We have not received any financial reimbursement since the 3rd.”

For the first time, Seattle is losing population. To be “progressive,” Seattle is imposing a massive capital gains tax increase — socking it to the rich. So they are fleeing the city and Washington state.

One of the nation’s top demographers, Wendell Cox, has been analyzing the just-released Census Bureau data on county population. He found that “during the late 2010s and before the pandemic, population growth and domestic migration transitioned toward smaller metropolitan areas from larger ones. That outmigration is accelerating.”

The nation’s 10 largest counties have lost more than 1 million residents since 2019. The biggest losers have been the counties that are home to New York and San Francisco and Chicago’s Cook County. Even Los Angeles County, the nation’s most populous county, with just under 10 million people, is now contracting.

Welcome to the real-world impact of progressivism. Instead of worker paradises, the Left has transitioned our once-shining cities into slums, murder zones, homeless encampments and boarded-up stores. They have become cults of economic and political quackery — and tragically, few Democrats have the courage to speak out. They are worried about being called racists when the reality is that the victims — of terrible public schools, high murder rates and an anti-business creed — are the minorities they say they care so much about.

The three poisons of America’s leftist cities are 1) high taxes, 2) schools that don’t educate and 3) crime running rampant. As mayors such as Rudy Giuliani of New York City proved in the 1990s after the Big Apple had been driven to its knees, all it takes is committed leadership to fix these problems. Things can change quickly, as they did in Manhattan.

The fact that Chicagoans have elected not a reformer, but a deformer, suggests that inner-city residents still don’t get it — or they don’t care. Or they are all on the payroll of the city governments that are going bankrupt. Alas, our cities can’t be saved if the voters in these metropolises don’t want to be saved. (read more)

The House Judiciary Committee has released evidence {Letter Here}, gained from a transcribed interview with former Acting CIA Director Mike Morell, showing a coordinated plan by former and current Intelligence Community officials (both parties) to work with the political campaign of Joe Biden in order to influence the 2020 election outcome.

Within the transcribed interview, Mike Morell admits to receiving a phone call from current Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, with a request to create disinformation and protect Joe Biden from scrutiny over the Hunter Biden laptop revelations.  Morell then coordinated with 50 intelligence officials to fabricate a claim that Russians had created the Biden laptop story as a disinformation campaign.  The reality was that Morell organized the U.S. intelligence community to create disinformation on behalf of Joe Biden.

The United States intelligence community is politically weaponized against American citizens.

The United States justice department, the DOJ, is politically weaponized against American citizens.

We need to take down the four pillars that support the Fourth Branch of Government.  The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS), the Dept of Justice National Security Division (DOJ-NSD), and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), all need to be dissolved.

After those four pillars are removed, the Patriot Act needs to be abolished and the FBI placed under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Marshals service. (read more)

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.”

— Revelation 6 verse 8 (In the Bible a pale horse is a prominent symbol of death and pestilence.)

Provenance and apologies

Whilst this article is written from a purely UK perspective or, to be precise, an Anglo-Irish one, its primary thrust is applicable across the whole of the Western Ecumene from the Antipodes to the Americas.

Also, it is said that all writing is plagiarism, and I am certain that much of what I write is such. For the best part of eighty years I have been a copious reader across a considerable range of news, literature, history, commentary and opinion and thus I offer my thanks and apologies to any authors who, reading this, recognise a paraphrasing of their own contribution(s) to this dialectic.

Prologue: A soupçon of geography and history

An archipelago is a group of islands closely scattered in a body of water. Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland are the two largest constituents of a windswept archipelago in the North Atlantic lying to the west of Continental Europe. This ancient archipelago is centred on the British mainland at Latitude and Longitude 54° 00′ N and 2° 00′. Overall, it is a roughly linear feature running north to south from the Nordic-influenced Shetland Islands, through the Orkney Islands, the Outer Hebrides, the Isle of Man and finally to the Isle of Wight off the southern coast of England.

In a west-to-east direction, it encompasses the predominantly Catholic Republic of Ireland (Éire) in the south and the far smaller, predominantly Protestant, six counties of Northern Ireland (British). The oft-disputed geological and geopolitical anomaly of the Channel Islands — Guernsey, Jersey, Sark, Herm and the private islet of Jethou (part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey) — lies 100 miles due south from the English mainland at Weymouth and 12 miles due west from the French mainland on the Cotentin Peninsula.

[As an aside, geophysics has determined that the lonely pinnacle of Rockall is part of the land mass that broke off from Europe and hence is also part of the archipelago.]

Once contiguous with mainland Europe, it became separated 450,000 years ago. Stretched by tectonics and pounded by great waters a mega flood finally destroyed the land bridge that had physically connected the islands of Britain with continental Europe for some 10 million years. This crossing, consisting of relatively soft chalk, was approximately 20 miles wide and ran from Dover to Calais.

After the land bridge disappeared the only way that invasive tribes could cross the Channel was by hazarding their lives in fragile, generally unseaworthy boats, something they only managed to accomplish in small numbers owing to the unpredictable weather conditions and dangerous currents, and because in those days our farcical Border Force and the RNLI water taxi services did not exist. Now they come by their hundreds and thousands, parasites and predators all from every failed, primitive socio-economic basket case on the planet.

“…We have explained before that human beings cannot exist except through social organisation and cooperation for the purpose of obtaining their food and other necessities of life. Each one will stretch out their hand for whatever he needs and try to take it since injustice and aggressiveness are in the animal nature.”

— From ‘The Muqaddimah’ (The Classic Islamic History of the World) by Ibn Khaldûn, Chapter Three, Proposition 21, “On dynasties, royal authority, the caliphate, government ranks and all that goes with these things.”

The human predilection to gather in co-operative groupings in order to shape, control and utilise a particular environment for the benefit of all members of a homogeneous community is as old as our species. It is an animal thing, a pack thing, a tribal thing. In zoology, sociology and psychology the phrase ‘territorial imperative’ is used to describe the need to claim and defend a territory, its assets, its physical and historic achievements and the successful socio-political organisation that generated them.

It has been argued that in human terms the intensity of the need to exercise a territorial imperative is inversely proportional to the length of time such a domain has been populated by a particular group who have become morally and ideologically united and are genetically homogenous, not the mongrel products of retrogressive human xenogamy.

Essentially, throughout the Euro-Anglosphere there have evolved those socio-cultural characteristics and modes of conduct that determine and will forever define why and what we are, and so clearly separate us from the descendants of the tribes of Arabian Peninsula, those conquered by them and those of the predominantly feral, low-IQ, predatory and violently unstable African ethnicity.

To continue: Over the ensuing millennia after the land bridge was no more the European tribes continued to come. It began with a trickle of Mesolithic and Neolithic peoples followed by the men of the Bronze and Iron ages, then Celts, then Romans, then Saxons, then the Angles as they penetrated inland from the Wash to challenge the Saxon hegemony.

Later, from what is now Scandinavia, came ferocious boat peoples, the Vikings, and later still their Norman descendants, to challenge in their turn. Thus it came to pass that all these tribes of crook-boned men made war time after time after time, but over the passage of that time sanity or necessity prevailed. Thereafter came a wary peace punctuated by bouts of intermarriage and fractious squabbling until finally settling into the bucolic homogeneity of a predominantly Anglo-Saxon country and culture with certain Germanic and Nordic overtones.

This essential core is a frail, a sometimes faltering yet always thoughtful assemblage of original ideas generated by often painful social experimentation, and was developed at great expense by Europeans from within and amongst themselves.

It was not derived from or by and holds no place for those addicted to the megalomaniacal diktats of an acquisitive sociopath who came wandering out of the desert at the end of the hashish season fourteen centuries ago with his eyeballs rotating in opposite directions and mass murder in mind PBUH.

However, having said that with such certitude, I must acknowledge that this once-strong, once-vibrant collection of nation-states, including my own, is facing a bleak future in disarray and uncertainty. When we look down into those seething urban cesspits, the occupied territories wherefrom criminality, drug dealing, gratuitous violence, serial rape, and Jihad are spreading like wildfire, we see the festering result of a policy of permitting — indeed encouraging — an aggressive, theocratic political system and a horde of unreconstructed, violent, genetically criminal oriented sub-Saharans to put down deep roots within the borders of a relatively stable and, yes, far more advanced society.

In increasing numbers, the indigenous Britons (and many indigenous Europeans) see this rapidly spreading plague for what it is. Either intuition or a resurgent survival instinct leads them to acknowledge, despite a torrent of disinformation to the contrary, that the products of inclusion and diversity are not welcome symbionts, but predatory parasites — organisms that kill their hosts by slowly consuming them.

This now daily increasing tide of invaders and their soon to be ‘family reunified’ horde of dependents following up behind them, together with the Ottoman Muslim northern Albanian Mafiosi*who are creating a vast criminal underworld in the UK must be swiftly wrenched from the teats of our culture and ejected from this the land of our fathers.

[*Is there a ‘Turkish’ barbershop in your area? Well, dear reader, Turks they are not. They are linear descendants of Iskanderbeg, Gjergj Kastrioti Skënderbeu (1405-17 January 1468), known as Skanderbeg, an Albanian feudal lord and military commander who led a rebellion against the Ottoman Empire in what is today Albania, North Macedonia, Greece, Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia.]

If they are not stopped dead in their tracks now and then removed post haste by means of whatever force is necessary, they will continue expanding their malignant empire until they have destroyed us as a culture, drained us financially and rendered what few us are unlucky enough to survive as aliens in our own land… probably as their slaves.

Proposition II: The Phoney War has ended — London is lost and other major cities are following suit

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property — either as a child, a wife, or a concubine — must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”

— From ‘The River War’ by Winston Spencer Churchill

Visually, London’s skyline is an ugly hodgepodge punctuated by mosques and minarets amidst the gleaming glass carbuncles of Mammon all towering over what is left of the glorious architectural achievements of the past. This diseased conurbation, which can only be described as Afro-Islam-on-Thames, replicates the festering, backward third-world cesspits that they or their immediate ancestors came from. It is ruled by a demagogic dwarf who only ventures out in a black-windowed armoured Range Rover escorted by a collection of thugs deemed to be his ‘security’’.

In essence, the capital of the no longer United Kingdom is under the jackboot of a Pakistani Muslim Mayor, and has become a dangerous, violent crime-ridden third world cesspit replacing what was once the sound beating heart of a great nation; the human effluent seeping out from it is now poisoning even those few unoccupied territories still left in this once green and pleasant land.

The Mother of Parliaments still sits there, but is infested with so-called Honourable and Right Honourable Members from the occupied territories (mostly Labour Party constituencies) whose first allegiance is not to this their adopted country but to whatever failed hellhole and corrupt political ideology they or their immediate ancestors came from… legally or illegally.

Eire and Scotland fare no better. Leo Eric Varadkar is an Irish politician who has served as Taoiseach since December 2022, and previously from 2017 to 2020. Born on 18 January 1979, in Dublin, Varadkar is the third child and only son of Ashok and Miriam (née Howell) Varadkar. His father was born in Bombay (now Mumbai), India, and moved to the United Kingdom in the 1960s to work as a doctor. Leo Varadkar spent several years as a non-consultant hospital doctor, eventually qualifying as a general practitioner in 2010. In 2004 he joined Fine Gael and became a member of Fingal County Council and later served as Deputy Mayor of Fingal. He was elected to Dáil Éireann for the first time in 2007. During the campaign for the 2015 same-sex marriage referendum, Varadkar came out as gay, becoming the first serving Irish minister to do so.

In May 2017, Taoiseach Enda Kenny announced that he would resign as Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader. Varadkar stood in the leadership election to replace him; although more party members voted for his opponent, Simon Coveney, he won by a significant margin among Fine Gael members of the Oireachtas, and was elected leader on 2 June. Twelve days later he was appointed Taoiseach, and at 38 years of age became the youngest person to hold the office. He is Ireland’s first, and the world’s fifth, openly gay head of government and the first Taoiseach to be from an ethnic minority in Ireland.

[One of my distant Irish cousins suggested that Varadkar should fully integrate by renaming himself Liam O’Varad. Another suggested something far more radical and interesting but definitely unsuitable for repetition here.]

In Scotland, one Humza Yousaf, a Pakistani of Punjabi ‘heritage’, is a self-declared ‘non-practising(!)’ Muslim who was previously the Scottish Health Secretary and presided over the most dysfunctional health service in the UK — and that is a very low bar indeed. He recently contended for and won the leadership of the Scottish Nationalist Party (not difficult, as it was a crowded field of mediocrity by all accounts, and he was the back-room-designated heir apparent anyway) after his predecessor as First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, abruptly shuffled off into the shadows with her ‘husband’, Peter Murrell, the former CEO of the SNP, to await the results of Police Scotland’s investigation into the manner in which he/they and others conducted the financial affairs of that dysfunctional devolved government and about which the new Glorious Leader, ‘Yousaf, the now conveniently mosque-allergic Scotsman’, vows to know nothing about this, nor that several months ago the SNP’s auditors had withdrawn their services for reasons not stated in their notification of this decision. Bless.

[N.B. On 26 June 2018, Sturgeon promoted Yousaf to the Scottish Cabinet to serve as Cabinet Secretary for Justice. In the year prior to his appointment (2017-18), 244,504 crimes were recorded by the police in Scotland; in the final year of his tenure (2020-21), the figure was 246,511.]

One of his flagship policies was the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill, which he promised would streamline existing legislation as well as add additional protections to persecuted minorities while maintaining rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. The bill was criticised by the Catholic Church, the National Secular Society as well as various writers and, in September 2020, it was amended to remove prosecution for cases of unintentionally stirring up hate, which could theoretically include libraries stocking contentious books. In October 2020, Yousaf said that the exception to the Public Order Act 1986 which allows people to use otherwise illegal language in their own homes should be abolished! A typical Muslim is Yousaf — I’m surprised that he didn’t have some poor woman stoned to death or honour killed for refusing to become a gender slave as they do on his home patch.

On a side note, the devolved government of the Principality of Wales, the Senedd, has segued into little more than an obscure Labour Party satrapy under the somewhat less than inspiring leadership of one Mr. Mark Drakeford who, apart from renaming the Brecon Beacons National Park because the word ‘beacon’ offends and frightens the moronic and meteorologically illiterate climate change fraternity, I can think of nothing else to add other than he leads a minority administration, whatever that may or may not imply about the political meanderings of the Sons of Harlech. Or of the millions of sheep, for that matter.

[Breaking as I write on April 18 2023 — the rot is deep in Scotland: SNP treasurer Colin Beattie has today been arrested in connection with the ongoing investigation into the party’s funding and finances. The 71-year-old is being held by detectives probing what happened to more than £600,000 in donations to the Scottish National Party, Police Scotland said. It comes a fortnight after Nicola Sturgeon’s husband Peter Murrell, the party’s former chief executive, was arrested and then released.]

Proposition II: Rape is a Weapon of War

Rape and sexual abuse are not just a by-product of war but are used as a deliberate military strategy and have become part of the terrain of war. The opportunistic rape and pillage of previous centuries has been replaced in modern conflict by rape used as an orchestrated combat tool.

— By Amnesty International as reported by BBC News

In the UK and elsewhere across the Euro-Anglosphere ordinary citizens find themselves engulfed in the maelstrom of a combined Race, Territorial and Holy War, a reality which is either ignored or quietly side-lined by the political classes, their metropolitan dinner party chatterati and a subservient media surreptitiously orchestrated by a deeply infiltrated political class with a vested interest in the final outcome. In the UK the House of Commons is infested with BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic) ‘Honourable Members’ from all parties but who in the main have been elected in Labour Party constituencies within the occupied territories.

Expository Interlude

Public Order Act 1936 (extant): Prohibition of uniforms in connection with political objects.

(1) Subject as hereinafter provided, any person who in any public place or at any public meeting wears uniform signifying his association with any political organisation or with the promotion of any political object shall be guilty of an offence.

A cross-party group of MPs have urged the home secretary to ensure “justice is served” over an alleged racially aggravated attack on a black schoolgirl in Surrey.

The politicians have asked Suella Braverman to ensure “every possible action” is taken to investigate after a 15-year-old was injured in a “horrific” assault near Thomas Knyvett College, in Ashford, on Monday. The 32 MPs have also demanded that the school be investigated and its response to the incident “evaluated immediately”. They also want Ms Braverman to give further information on what safeguarding practices are in place for black, Asian and ethnic minority students at risk of racist abuse. Police are investigating after footage shared online appeared to show the pupil being punched, kicked and having her hair pulled, while her attackers were egged on by adults.

Labour MP Janet Daby, chair of the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on children in police custody, who wrote the letter, told The Independent it was “one of the most horrific incidents” she had been made aware of in her career. [Dear me — schoolkids fighting; whatever next I wonder, kids bunking off school or not doing their homework?]

However, the next day a bunch of badged-up black thugs turned up outside the school in numbers and in full camouflage uniforms and homemade body armour calling themselves the FF FORCE, and threatened the headmaster and staff of the school.

Had this been a bunch of white guys similarly attired and making threats they would have been arrested on the spot, charged with being a far right hate group then banged up in a high security prison never to see the light of day again. Naturally, nothing happened to the enrichers who actually did appear in military uniform and threaten all and sundry. Double standards are the rule in multiculti Britain when it comes to BAME’s**.

[** black, Asian and Minority Ethnics. For non-British readers unfamiliar with this use of the word ‘Asian’ it is a devious obfuscation, a code word for Muslims in general and specifically the predominantly Pakistani/Bangladeshi/Middle Eastern/Afghani paedophile rape gangs. I often wonder how genuine Orientals feel about this insulting straw-man calumny.]

Proposition III: The BBC is an Enemy of the People

To describe the BBC as an enemy of the people is not necessarily as outrageous as it would first appear. Even a cursory look its track record over recent years is sufficient to give serious credence to that proposition. From the cover-up of the Jimmy Savile paedophile rape saga to the attempted beatification of the brutal ISIS enforcer Shamima Begum, its track record stinks of hypocrisy, disinformation and dissemblance whenever challenged by those with opposing facts.

For example, Newsnight host Jeremy Paxman once said that the programme’s resources had become stretched, and he further went on to explain why he believed the decision not to run the Savile investigation was wrong: “These people [paedophiles] prey upon children in vulnerable situations and when the children complain they are not believed. I thought that we [BBC Newsnight] had behaved just like many other authorities and I didn’t like it.”

On Savile, he said: “It was, I would say, common gossip that Jimmy Savile liked, you know, young — it was always assumed to be girls. I don’t know whether it was girls or boys. I have no evidence of it, and I never saw anything that made me take it more seriously than it being common gossip.” Then, on why the BBC had not dealt with the Savile story sooner, he said “We wouldn’t even tackle a bloody story that was about our own programme. This is pathetic.” Later, in an email to Peter Rippon, he said he believed the decision not to run the investigation had been wrong, but added: “…just for the record, I think it is very unfair (and sadly not at all untypical) that the BBC has dumped all this on one individual. It will pass. But I think the BBC’s behaviour now is almost as contemptible as it was then.”

Proposition IV: The smoke and mirrors of political discourse on the subject of ‘Community Cohesion’ highlights the institutionalised treachery of a succession of British governments

“Men are superior to women on account of the qualities which Allah gifted one above the other, and on account of the outcome they make from their substance for them. “

— The Quran, SURA IV verse thirty-eight

Below is a selection of the very few groomers (paedophile rapists) who, having not legged it back to Pakistan, have actually been convicted and slapped on their wrists with derisory prison sentences in the hope that this would silence the protests that grew as the political cover-up burst at the seams and the truth leaked out into the light of day.

If, in modern Britain, you want know the identity of those who are in the process of trying to destroy you and your way of life look first for those whom you may not criticise “in the interests of community cohesion”. At that time the legislative and executive branches and other political apparatchiks such as the then-Prime Minster Gordon Brown decided that the paedophile rape of white children by Pakistanis in Rotherham, Bradford and elsewhere throughout the UK was to be buried and denied as their multiple postal votes were essential for Labour success in both local and national elections.

But beware; should you speak out or, dare I say it, actively defend yourselves and your communities the complicit Muslim- and Labour Party-dominated local councils, the ‘enriched’ constabularies and a peculiarly disinterested Crown Prosecution Service will do their hardest to punish, silence and cancel you as they did to the victims and the families of the victims of these pusillanimously described ‘grooming’ gangs.

However, the rot goes much deeper than that and as a consequence the UK and much of the rest of the Western demographic is being intellectually and morally sidelined in favour of the socially destructive practice of ‘affirmative action’ which has inevitably led to the cultural and academic abomination known as ‘Diversity Hires’. These hires are on the whole BAMEs and sexual deviants with dubious qualifications… if any at all. In fact, a BAME who has genuinely earned a real degree in a serious subject is about as rare as an honest politician.

Take for example one Professor Jason Arday:

“A man who only learned how to read and write when he was 18 and could not speak until he was 11 has become Cambridge University’s youngest Black professor. However* he proved everybody wrong and next month will start at the University of Cambridge as Professor of Sociology of Education in the Faculty of Education. At the age of 37 he is the youngstest* Black professor, and just one of five at the university. In the UK there are 155 Black university professors, out of 23,000. He told My London: “My work focuses primarily on how we can open doors to more people from disadvantaged backgrounds and truly democratise higher education.”

[*Quoted verbatim from the barely readable MIRROR online ‘newspaper’, now only for the benefit of the barely-literate multiculti benefit classes but once known as the Daily Mirror in the days when it employed intelligent, well-educated and rather more erudite journalists and editors, albeit always committed Marxist-Socialists.]

Across the private and public sectors people such as Arday are being appointed and promoted not on the basis of their qualifications, experience and accomplishments but because of their ethnicity, weird sexual predilections or to satisfy their endless demands for special treatment, privileges and unearned parity (see the first paragraph of the epilogue below). The price for this is paid by highly qualified white and heterosexual people who are thus ruthlessly discriminated against, discarded and cast into the academic, military and other professional wildernesses.

The moral elasticity of politician’s minds is a product of their desire to empower, enrich and indulge themselves by whatever means are necessary. This abrogation of personal integrity surfaces when they first appear before a selection committee, continues apace if they are selected to stand for that constituency, and hits a high point when they go on the stump vote-whoring; then, should they succeed and become MPs, it comes into full blossom as they attempt to climb ever higher on the greasy Party-political pole. During this process they soon learn the dark art of refusing to give straightforward answers when on television, radio or at any other public venue where they are asked a question on the record and it is one that they are not prepared to answer. This is known as the ABCO³ model:

A.   Acknowledge the question (but don’t answer it).
B.   Bridge — make some tenuous connection to the lies you actually intend to peddle.
C.   Communicate — in other words, when what you want to talk about doesn’t wash, revert to the oldest trick in the book which is:
O³  Obfuscation, obfuscation, obfuscation.

It is axiomatic that when so many well-meaning people realise that their naïvety allowed them to be shuffled into a moral and intellectual black hole, a logic warp, where every sub-species of deviancy becomes the norm and normal heterosexuals became deviants (and racists, of course, but as racism is a survival trait that evolution has hard wired into our genes for good reason that is of no consequence here) their righteous anger will be a palpable thing.

One hopes they will come to understand that transexualism***, with the exception of the very occasional naturally born hermaphrodite, is a mental illness that has become a parody of human biology and reproduction, a world of meaningless pronouns, of the moronic claims that there truly is such a thing as ‘gender diversity’ and how the use and abuse of our language brought about the time of the intellectually- and historically-challenged so called ‘climate change’ fanatics, those who, amongst other things, are trying to bring about universal vegan-level malnutrition with its attendant synaptic damage resultant from depriving the brain of those amino acids acquired from animal protein, which are essential for full and efficient brain function in omnivores.

Combine all this with the attempt to force us into Net Zero power poverty and a new dark age for Western civilisation approaches — except for those of the emerging dynastic global power cabal, the new royalty and their privileged offspring who intend that they alone shall inherit the earth.

***
“The concept of autogynephilia defines a typology of MtF (Male to Female) transsexualism and offers a theory of motivation for one type of MtF transsexualism. Autogynephilia resembles a sexual orientation in that it involves elements of idealization and attachment as well as erotic desire.” —Anne A Lawrence, 2011

The term autogynephilia (auto for self, gyne for female, philia for desire, often shortened AGP) refers to a psychological condition in which a man (usually heterosexual) derives sexual or even “romantic” pleasure from the fantasy of being female. The term was coined by psychologist Ray Blanchard after working with and studying many transsexual patients.

While not being the only reason for wanting to become a male-to-female (MtF) transsexual or claiming to “identify as a woman,” autogynephilia seems to be exhibited by a great deal of [transvestites]. According to a 2015 survey of roughly 3000 American [transvestites], at least 60% stated attraction to women, meaning they are heterosexual males. According to Ray Blanchard’s studies, this would put them in the autogynephilic category, as homosexual transsexuals (HSTS) generally don’t exhibit AGP.

Feminists are often critical of men openly exhibiting AGP and find them offensive, especially if they claim to be women, since their fantasy of being female usually seems to be based on highly sexist, objectifying, and reductive notions of womanhood.

Transgender activists claim that the concept is a transphobic myth, as it asserts that non-homosexual transsexuals are essentially under the effect of a paraphilia, or more bluntly a sexual fetish. They insist on the monolithic “female gender identity” theory to explain all MtF transsexualism and transgender identification, seeing woman-attracted [transvestites] as “trans lesbians” who should be accepted as being just like any other lesbian woman.”

The desecration of our history, the vandalizing and denigration of our national monuments and the destruction of academic integrity in order to make way for the indoctrination of our young with the intention of turning them into drones living in human hives where they would own nothing and be happy… if they survived the vaccines, that is.

And, on that subject, the pandemic which began in 2019 begat a new disease, a potential bio-warfare agent which was genetically engineered using a CRISPR ‘gain of function’ technique on what was originally a disease endemic in bats; this became the virus SARS Cov,-2 which escaped from a poorly-designed and insecure bio-warfare laboratory built by the French for the Chinese, and defined our immediate future.

Thereafter, the ‘pandemic’ evolved into case of global mass hysteria which led to the rise of a group of malignant and incompetent elites, many with a vested financial interest in novel, mutagenic ‘vaccines’. They took the opportunity to seize and control the way of life of national entities on a global scale. It was and remains slavery in all but name applied by a relatively small coterie of international megalomaniacs hiding under the umbrella of organisations masquerading as an Economic Forum, a New World Order, the World Health Organisation and UN Agenda 2030.

Finally, driven by a sense of territorial and moral imperatives, the common man is awakening to the depredations of these emasculated Western governments which are led by a cabal of avaricious opportunists who can now do nothing but lash out in fear and outrage as their end time approaches

Come what may it is here and now that the next chapters of our island story are writing themselves in the sands of time but, before any system can be transformed, the minds trapped within that system must be liberated. That is the objective of this article.

This ‘Woke’ world which is being imposed upon us is bereft of any relationship to reality. It brings us transvestites and incels, the self-imposed victims of Frankensteinian mental illnesses that parody human biology and reproduction, and brings with them a mélange of meaningless pronouns that undermine the true function of a rational language and an age of corrupting ideologies such as the imposition of Net Zero energy poverty, of the distortion and misrepresentation of our history by presenting it out of its time and place, of the vandalizing and denigration of our national monuments and the destruction of academic integrity in order to make way for the indoctrination of our young with the intention of turning them into drones living in human hives where they would own nothing and be happy… if they survive the vaccines, that is.

Afterword: The Pennington Solution

Death is the healer of incurable diseases.

— Aeschylus, 525-456 BC

Lundy Island is a rocky pedestal that lies on the northern side of the mouth of the Bristol Channel where it enters the sea. To the south of Lundy there are dangerous shoals which force ships into a relatively narrow channel close to Lundy when entering and leaving the Port of Bristol. Its craggy northwest aspect looks out over the Celtic Sea towards Éire and, at the foot of it, there is a rich, protected fishing ground which so far has not been plundered by the huge industrial fishing vessels of the EU fleet which are decimating fish stocks everywhere they trawl by indiscriminately catching and discarding vast quantities of non-target species, thus causing untold damage to the pelagic environment.

From 1627 to 1632 a group of Barbary pirates occupied Lundy and used it as base for the taking of ships, for raiding European coastal communities and as a holding pen for their captives before shipping them south at the end of the summer sailing season to the slave markets of the North African Republic of Salé (now Salé in Morocco) and Algiers.

It was only during this turbulent five-year period that a Muslim flag has ever flown openly over British territory, for late in 1632 an expeditionary force led by Sir John Pennington bombarded the island and then he and his men at arms stormed ashore and put the survivors to the sword — a most equitable solution particularly attractive to us on the mainland in view of today’s mass invasion and the political treachery that enables it.

Finally, in closing, I would point out that that Lundy remains Muslim-free to this day, the only part of Britain, Northern Ireland and Éire to still enjoy such a safe, stable and peaceful environment free from the depredations of modern-day barbarians, so perhaps a Pennington Solution may be the most sensible and effective course of action for the rest of us to take. We will just have to wait and see, of course… but not for too long, as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland now has a multi-millionaire globalist Hindu Prime Minister whose extended family has some very interesting banking and other rather murky connections.

Epilogue: Of things that were, things that are and things to come

Blow out, you bugles, over the rich Dead!
There’s none of these so lonely and poor of old,
But, dying, has made us rarer gifts than gold.
These laid the world away; poured out the red
Sweet wine of youth; gave up the years to be
Of work and joy, and that unhoped serene,
That men call age; and those who would have been,
Their sons, they gave, their immortality.

Blow, bugles, blow! They brought us, for our dearth,
Holiness, lacked so long, and Love, and Pain,
Honour has come back, as a king, to earth,
And paid his subjects with a royal wage;
And Nobleness walks in our ways again;
And we have come into our heritage.

— Rupert Brooke, 1914

— Seneca III, in an unrecognisable Middle England this April in the year of our Lord 2023 where our Island story will shortly come to an end, reduced to nothing more than a few dusty pages in far-future history books unless we reach up to grasp a new sun and sow our own dragons’ teeth.

Was the accelerant the COVID-19 pandemic and unhinged lockdowns? Or was the catalyst the woke revolution fueled by the 2020 summer of exempted rioting, looting, arson, and violence? Or was it perhaps the deranged fixation on removing Donald Trump from the presidency and destroying the rule of law in the process? Or all that and more? 

Now with the election of Joe Biden, what had been a fast-tracked decline has accelerated at such an astonishing rate we can scarcely recognize our country.

Our largest cities are becoming uninhabitable—dilapidated, dangerous, and dysfunctional. The challenge is not just rampant crime, but the realization that if you, the citizen, are stabbed, shot, or beaten up on the street, the perpetrators may well be exempt from most punishments. And the victim either will be forgotten in his misery or, indeed, blamed for bringing such violence upon himself.

Urban schools are not places of instruction anymore. That fact is accepted by teachers’ unions, whose operative principle seems to be that the more hopeless the idea of educating urban youth is understood to be, the less burdensome the workload, and the greater their hazardous duty pay.

Urban chain stores are closing down on the principle that if police cannot or will not stop consumer violence and theft, then consumers there should not have any store to buy anything, anyway. If there is no store, how can it be looted or shop-lifted?

The only mystery remaining is how long these Democrat-controlled, racially charged, and corrupt municipalities can sustain their budgets and pension commitments with increasingly declining revenue. One can tax the well off, and perhaps even gouge them as California does. But one cannot insult and ridicule them in the process. Being highly taxed is one thing, being highly taxed while hated is quite another.

How eerie that medievalism—defecting, urinating, fornicating, injecting in the street—is relabeled “homelessness—as if the problem is merely a shortage of apartments or tent cities. Somehow cities developed the notion that it was crueler to be told not to pull down one’s pants and defecate in the street than it was for a pedestrian to step into infectious human excrement.

In the next five years, either cities will seek new governance to reduce taxes, break up municipal unions, mandate charter schools, restore police funding and manpower, recalibrate pensions, and prosecute criminals and corrupt officials—or Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, and a score of others will become Detroit.

One of the strangest phenomena amid our current debility are the millions of affluent leftists and liberals who have fled their unworkable, now unlivable blue-run, but naturally beautiful cities like San Francisco or Portland. They seem to lack an abstract recognition why they are leaving, or why and how their new chosen destinations are so different and therefore so inviting to them. Is their motto, “I am fleeing what I created, but I still hate those who created what I want”?

To have a “border problem,” one must have a border. The United States has no southern border.

Upwards of 7 million illegal entries since the Biden inauguration are proof enough of that tragedy. Mexico brags that 40 million have come into the United States. It urges them to vote Democratic. And it relies on still more illegal entries to ensure yearly increases in its current $60 billion in remittance income sent from its expatriates in the United States. The donors apparently grow fonder of Mexico—the more they are safely distant from it.

America could close the border tomorrow and actually “make Mexico pay for the wall” by simply slapping a 10 percent export tax on all remittances sent to Mexico. Or we could make it illegal to send money out of the country if one is receiving federal subsidies and aid. Or we could fine employers for hiring those who are here illegally. Or, as a deterrent to future illegal entries, we could immediately deport all who illegally entered and reside in the United States—if they came within the last five years, or if they have a criminal record, or if they are not working and are on public assistance.

The result would not just be a restoration of American sovereignty, and decline in spiraling social service costs. There would follow better relations with Latin America and Mexico. Both treat us with contempt as a hectoring weakling because, unlike themselves, we do not believe in our own physical space, our own borders, and our freedom to do as we please rather than what others tell us to do.

Abroad, our allies and neutrals are distancing themselves from America—France, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, India, Turkey, South Korea—on the Ukraine War, China, the dollar as the global currency, and our popular culture.

Why? Our increasingly former friends conclude it is now dangerous to ally openly with the United States and for a variety of reasons:

1) They see the once indomitable United States as weak—as a possible liability rather than an asset. After China’s balloon surveillance, the Afghanistan flight, the inability to achieve strategic victory after intervening in Iraq and Libya, the current embarrassing Pentagon leak, the Anchorage mini-summit, the woke obsessions in the U.S. military, and the inability to ensure its military is well-staffed, apolitical, and equipped with the world’s most plentiful and cutting-edge weaponry, allies assume that the United States will not necessarily win any intervention it undertakes but may well drag them down with it.

2) The United States may suddenly turn on an ally, demonize it, and refuse to meet with its leaders, as Biden gratuitously maligned Saudi Arabia and Israel.

3) America asks allies to join its cause of the day regardless of whether it is in those nations’ own interest. So South Korea, Japan, India, or Egypt do not believe boycotting Russian oil or openly selling Ukraine weapons is necessarily in their interests. 

4) Our woke revolution is so volatile, irrational, and unpredictable that allies never know when they will be accused of being homophobic, transphobic, racist, or sexist and treated accordingly—or whether the United States will be eternally crippled by internal woke dissension and civil unrest.

5) The allies do not believe the United States can keep secrets, especially after the latest leak. From the Dobbs draft leak and the Comey leak of a confidential conversation with President Trump to the Vindman-Ciaramella-Schiff impeachment psychodrama leaks to Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, leakers and “whistleblowers” feel there are few consequences to leaking classified information (unless it is embarrassing to leftist administrations), or indeed leaking to the media to overturn institutions and presidencies.

America must reform the entire Pentagon process of spending and appropriations. It must end woke and identity politics, ideological indoctrination, and return to a meritocracy. It should prohibit retiring generals and admirals from revolving into defense contractor boards and lobbyists. It should finally enforce the Uniform Code of Military Justice that prohibits active and retired high-ranking officers from publicly attacking their current commander-in-chief. It should charge leakers with felonies and prosecute perjury. Had the government done that with Andrew McCabe, John Brennan, James Comey, and James Clapper the accruing deterrence would have discouraged others with lower profiles. 

Biden is on schedule to run up a $2 trillion annual deficit, adhering to the Bush, Obama, and Trump legacy of unfettered spending. In Biden’s case, he insanely printed over $4 trillion at a time when labor participation rates were already in decline, COVID-suppressed demand was returning, and transportation and production interruptions were reducing supply. He raised taxes, increased regulations, cut projected increases in gas and oil production, and canceled energy projects. The result was the highest inflation in 40 years, near-record energy costs, soaring interest rates, the largest modern percentage of debt to GDP at 130 percent, the greatest debt in our history at $33 trillion, and stagnant GDP. All that and more prompt the current Chinese-led effort to dethrone the dollar as the world’s currency. 

The remedies are agreed upon, but the needed medicine is feared more than the disease. Our elected leaders know we must, but never even attempt to, cut spending, reduce the size of the federal government radically, simplify the tax code and reduce taxes, deregulate, recalibrate Medicare and Social Security, develop our mineral, gas, and oil resources, and require labor participation for able-bodied entitlement recipients.

Never have Americans spent more on K-12 and higher education and never have they received less in return. The education industry is woke and nonmeritocratic. Research is diverted, sidetracked, and polluted by ideological commissars, endangering the U.S. lead in science, math, engineering, and the professions. Even scientists have become deductive, starting out with a preconceived woke conclusion they feel will win influence, grants, and notoriety and then scrambling to warp evidence to fit it.

The solutions are straightforward. Tax university endowment income—and lots of superfluous and harmful programs will vanish. 

Stop federal student loan guarantees, and soaring tuition and room-and-board costs will decline to the annual rate of inflation once universities must guarantee their own student loans. 

Require universities that receive federal funds of any sort to honor existing laws from the Bill of Rights to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. That would end segregated dorms and graduations. The next time administrators at Stanford or San Francisco State either aid or ignore student efforts to shout down or disrupt speakers and suppress free expression, their institutions should quickly be fined by the U.S. government or have their federal funding yanked.

If SAT and ACT entrance tests are being abolished, then they could be rebooted as exit tests required for a bachelor’s degree analogous to a bar exam. With such minimum standards, we might ascertain what, if anything, students had learned upon graduation. College graduates should be able to choose between an academic master’s degree or the school of education credential to teach K-12. Most would flee the latter option. Right-to-teach laws and the end to mandatory teacher union dues, along with the end of tenure and its replacement by five-year contracts with required minimum standards of achievement, would all bring some accountability to what is now an entirely unaccountable profession.

Race is no longer an accurate barometer of either victimhood or legitimate grievance. If “affirmative” action were to continue, it should be based entirely on class considerations, not the current system of Elizabeth Warrenesque fakery or delusions that the elite children of Eric Holder, the Obamas, the Duchess of Sussex, or LeBron James are in some need of compensatory privilege for college admissions, appointments, or hiring.

Because America is now multiracial, with untold ethnic and racial agendas, and countless and contorted collective grievances, it is impossible to sort out victimizers and victims. Junk the entire illiberal and patently illegal system of racial discrimination, and there would be an organic return to merit, and with it, race would become incidental, not essential to American identities. After 1964, it seems Orwellian that liberal institutions could continue to assign dorms by race, segregate graduations, and impose racial requisites to participate in special programs.

America’s former strength—the most transparent, accurate, and trustworthy elections in the world—have descended into its greatest liability. In the space of a mere eight years, and especially in reaction to radical political changes made under the cover of the COVID lockdown, we have gone from 70 percent of the electorate in most states voting on election day to a mere 30 percent. Yet the ballot rejection rate somehow diminished, with the flood of non-Election-Day ballots that overwhelmed accustomed audit and verification.

Election night is a mere construct. It is mostly meaningless. Local, state, and federal election results are stalled and descend into days, weeks, and sometimes even months of bickering, counter charges of ballot tampering and fraud, ballot harvesting and curing, and a loss of confidence in the integrity of the final result. Debates mean little anymore, once a large portion of the electorate has already voted. No wonder deceased candidates can win. Gaffes are now determined by whether they occur before or after the majority of voters has cast their ballots. 

There should be a national uniform standard that allows states to set their ballot procedures—as long as they result in 70 percent of the electorate voting in person on election day. 

America is in a similar position to where it was in 1861, 1929, 1941, and 1968—only perhaps worse, given in all those cases, there was at least a president and Congress that identified and reacted to the crisis, whereas today our elected government is what caused the crisis. (read more)

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about the US. And it’s not a political question, it’s an economic one. But there are predictions that the US could default in its national debt as soon as June, some say September, and we have a political standoff in this country, virtually no negotiation happening on how to resolve this. Does that undermine your confidence in the United States? And what message does that send to the world?

MADAME LAGARDE: I have huge confidence in the United States. You know, ever since my year in this country, and this city in ’73, ’74, I have had confidence in this country and I just cannot believe that they would let such a major, major disaster happen of the United States defaulting on its debt….

The Democrats have scheduled the stock market crash to take place the day that House Republicans vote to not raise the debt ceiling. Right afterwards, the Biden Administration will declare a temporary “default” on the U.S. Debt, the stock market and bond market will immediately crash, and Republicans will be blamed.

Conservative commentator Lou Dobbs has been advising Republicans to vote to raise the debt ceiling. In an interview with Steve Bannon on his March 21 podcast, Bannon and Dobbs both agreed that an economic crash was coming, but they didn’t know when it would occur. Bannon predicted that it would occur before the debt ceiling vote. Dobbs simply argued that refusing to vote for the debt ceiling would be a huge political mistake, one that could deal a “fatal blow to the Republican Party because Democrats will beat them to death.”

According to Dobbs, the government spending horse had already left the barn as most of the excess government spending under the current budget had already occurred. According to Dobbs:

I’ve always considered [the debt ceiling vote to be] too late to have the discussion about spending. It’s about authorization, and the result, if they don’t do it, will be another brutal beatdown by the Marxist Dems of the Republican Party just as they are emerging as a power force, a countervailing power against these destructive and anti-American Marxist Dems.

Democrats are incompetent at managing the economy, but they are experts at blaming Republicans, and they have the mainstream media as their Greek chorus. If Republicans refuse to raise the debt ceiling, the Biden administration will say that it was forced to default, and the media will ensure that Republicans will get blamed for the stock market and bond market crash that will immediately ensue.

Democrats intentionally did not increase the debt limit when they could have late last year. Perhaps this was to set up what they thought would be a politically useful showdown with Republicans. So eager is Biden to blame Republicans that he has repeatedly resorted to making up a negotiating position for Republicans that he can attack, all the while refusing himself to negotiate.

But if Republicans can avoid taking the blame for Biden’s economic crash, they could win big in 2024 and for years after that. Biden has bungled U.S. domestic and foreign policy, setting the U.S. up for an unprecedented domestic and international crisis. In Hungary, Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party has held supermajorities in the Hungarian parliament since 2010 for a variety of reasons, but a key reason is that the socialist government mismanaged the economy and government so badly that they created a crisis that required an IMF rescue package. In the U.S., Republicans were out of power for decades after they took the blame for the Great Depression.

The symptoms of the coming stock market crash are evident to the economists of the Democrat Party. For example, Larry Summers, one of President Obama’s former Treasury Secretaries, argued on "Wall Street Week" on April 14 (at the 41:15 mark) that real interest rates are being driven up by:

• “Huge Volumes of Government Debt.” According to economic statistics published by the St. Louis Fed, the interest being paid on the U.S. government debt went up from an annual rate of $550 billion in the first quarter of 2021 to $853 billion during the fourth quarter of 2022. Nearly one in every four dollars collected in revenue by the Federal government now must go out in interest payments. And with huge budget deficits combined with a stagnating economy (another Summers prediction), and high interest rates while the Fed continues to struggle to slow the inflation set-off in part by Biden’s suppression of U.S. oil and gas drilling, those huge payments are likely to continue to grow.
• “Very Large Flow Deficits.” The huge budget deficits passed by Biden when the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress are forcing the U.S. government to borrow money by selling Treasury Bonds. And the Fed can’t just buy those bonds and send the interest payments back to the government. It is in the red itself as it pays higher and higher interest to the banks on the reserves that they park at the Fed.
• “The Renewable Energy Transition.” The Democrats passed the Green New Deal, which they facetiously called the Inflation Reduction Act, so that the government would subsidize lots of green energy projects. They passed this expensive plan, even though it had already failed in Germany. If they actually believed that carbon dioxide in the air was a serious problem, they would be eliminating the regulations that prevent the building of carbon-free and reliable nuclear power plants.

When real interest rates go up, the prices of stocks and long-term bonds go down. And Summers wasn’t even mentioning the possibility of a dollar collapse which would make the real interest rate rise and the corresponding stock market crash even worse. (For an excellent discussion of the effects of a dollar collapse, see “What if the Dollar Falls?” by Peter St. Onge, an economist at the Mises Institute.) The BRICS countries led by China are making a major push to eliminate the dollar’s status as the primary international currency, and any success they achieve will lead to reduced demand for dollars and U.S. government debt, bringing about a crash in the exchange rate of the dollar.

Republicans should combine a debt ceiling increase with legislation empowering the president to exercise discretion concerning what to pay the next time the U.S. runs up against the debt ceiling. That way, in future, presidents will be unable to blame Congress for a default on U.S. bonds, and the debt ceiling will become a more potent negotiating leverage point for those who want to restore fiscal sanity to Washington. Congress also must reform its budgeting process: the current process was created in the 1970s and has, with rare exceptions, fueled massive deficits.

If House Republicans vote to raise the debt ceiling, they will have their chance to cut government spending when they pass a budget, appropriate funds, and authorize spending. In the meantime, Democrats will have taken the blame for the inflation and stock market crash that was caused by their reckless economic policies. (read more)

Did you happen to notice that what should have been an obvious moral victory for the Right a few weeks ago—when a transgender lunatic in Tennessee murdered six Christians—became instead, a civil rights triumph for the far Left? 

Instead of seeing headlines afterwards like “Left-wing terror targets innocent people for their religious beliefs during an apparent left-wing hate crime,” we got headlines about the racist Tennessee Republicans who expelled two black state representatives. 

Somehow a wanton slaughter of Christian children was miraculously transfigured into a “we shall overcome” second coming of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcom X, in the comical figure of Representative Justin Pearson.

What should have been a huge blow to the left, a total PR disaster, a massacre at the hand of one of their own, became instead a win. The narrative was written and signed off before the slow-moving Right even had a chance to get its act together. 

Murderess Audrey Hale, many suggest, had likely been incited to terror by the “Transgender Day of Vengeance” that radical activists were planning in the wake of Tennessee’s new popular law banning pediatric penis removal surgery.

In response, Pearson and others incited an insurrection around gun control in the state assembly, effectively shutting it down, and were then thrown out for breaking the rules. Terrified, the assembly then let them back in after it became, somehow, inexplicably, a civil rights issue around “white supremacy,” as Pearson declared. 

Congratulations, Tennessee: you have been color revolutioned!

Never let a crisis go to waste!

Color Me Yours

Color revolutions have finally come to the United States, courtesy of our leaders. The target is clear: weak red state governments which are going to be toppled, one by one. 

The official definition of color revolution is that it’s “the term used for popular uprisings against authoritarian regimes, such as those that took place in former Soviet countries such as Ukraine and Georgia in the early and mid-2000s.”

Revolver News Editor Darren Beattie had a slightly different definition of color revolution. It’s “a regime change model favored by many in our national security apparatus, particularly against Eastern European countries, to overthrow target regimes they don’t like.” 

Each of these political uprisings involves large crowds carrying flags and banners in one color, like the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine.

Our flag color, of course, is the intersectional rainbow. The seizure-inducing Progress Pride flag—with new stripes added to the rainbow to represent black, brown, and transgender people—is the new American revolution flag. All left-wing actions will be wrapped up in it, the way Sylvester Stallone wrapped himself in the flag at the end of Rocky IV.

The handful of states still resisting the regime are dissident traitors, doing what they can to stop the onslaught of vibrant progress everywhere, all at once. They’re like the French Resistance blowing up a few train tracks here and there across the countryside—just enough to enrage the enemy, but not enough to force a surrender, let alone stop all the trains.

Rittenhouse Redux

The wily supervillains on the other side have gotten even better at flexing this muscle since they started openly revolution-flexing in 2020. The rainbow-BLM coalition, the swinging hammer arm of the Regime, now swarms anyone who disrespects the hive. Every news event becomes just one more deployment of their shock rainbow troops to flood the zone and take no prisoners.

In 2020, Floyd protests against the police quickly transformed into “Black Trans Lives Matter” parades. During the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, millions of people were shocked to find out that Kyle had not in fact sprayed bullets into a crowd of innocent protestors and killed three black people, but instead had shot three white men who chased and attacked him. 

They probably also were surprised to learn that Kyle had been in Kenosha, Wisconsin, helping protect terrified local business owners. The previous night, you will recall, peaceful BLM protestors had looted and burned to the ground half the town. They were mad about a local cop shooting serial domestic abuser Jacob Blake while he was resisting arrest, holding a knife, and attempting to kidnap his girlfriend’s children. 

What should have been a conversation about why Jacob Blake was not in jail and why rioters were allowed to burn down half of the city became, instead, incredibly, a story about a racist white kid who terrorized the noble protestors with his AR-15.

Pride Cometh

In response to the horrific shooting in nearby Nashville, what did the Franklin, Tennessee city council decide to vote on last week?

Hosting a new Pride parade through the center of town! Franklin is a quiet, idyllic little town just south of where the Covenant school shooting took place, and according to friends who fled California for new, more peaceful lives there, no one wants or needs more Pride in town.

But the mayor surrendered, naturally, and bent the knee to the trans activists, perhaps in fear they would wreak even more vengeance against a local school. He voted to break the tie and allow the upcoming parade. 

A friend in Franklin sent me this: “​​What isn’t being reported is that businesses and companies spoke out against the parade. There has been a small gay festival outside town the last two years, and it was not well attended, and very small. This is just an outside activist push. The majority of the city is pretty upset. They were upset last year when there were drag performances in town. The city is being targeted, but there is no desire among the populace for this. [The Pride parade people] wanted the whole downtown this year.” 

And that’s exactly what they’re going to get.

Audrey Hale, you did not die in vain!

Swan Song of the South

Did you happen to notice where California Governor Gavin Newsom spent his children’s spring break this year? He didn’t drag them to a fancy resort or skiing in Big Sky, but took them to Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Florida. 

I guess rich white kids from Marin are clamoring to tour the Rosa Parks Museum this year. They can’t get enough Baptist church visits! Little Dutch and Montana Newsom are super into gospel music these days, I hear.

Newsom’s tour of the Deep South tells you exactly what this color revolution will be: deep blue. “Activists today should draw inspiration from the Civil Rights Movement in ‘the rollback of progress’ in red states.”

Newsom remarked that: “At the end of the day, that’s what’s going to be required of us to address so much of the Right’s regression, so much of the rollback of the progress that we’ve all enjoyed—the national advancement of rights in the last 50 years,” he said. “We have a lot of work to do to build a movement to counter what’s happening in red states across this country.”

Newsom’s message to the ruby-red south is: your color revolution is coming, hicks. If you step out of line, if you “roll back progress” so much as an inch, you will be quashed, overthrown, humiliated, and suppressed by the revolutionaries. You will be taught a lesson, spanked in public, and ritually tarred, and feathered.

“Newsom [also] plans to visit Indiana, Southern Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota and Texas to further his effort.” You have been warned!

Newsom’s tour of the south was tied to his newly launched “Campaign For Democracy.” The copy from his official website is literally textbook color revolution boilerplate:  

“The Campaign for Democracy was founded to expose and fight rising authoritarianism across the nation. We believe that all patriotic Americans must go on offense in red states as well as blue states, bringing the fight to statehouses, local communities, electoral battlegrounds, and our nation’s capital to save the great American experiment in democracy.” [Italics are mine.]