There’s an incredible new viral sensation sweeping the internet, and it’s both powerful and thought-provoking, offering a compelling snapshot of Biden’s America in disarray. So, what’s this intriguing online phenomenon?

Norman Rockwell paints modern America.

It’s a disturbing yet profoundly provocative modern AI tribute to Norman Rockwell, reimagining today’s disgraceful USA in Rockwell’s iconic style. Whoever conceived this idea is truly ingenious. These images are striking because they place the everyday propaganda we’re exposed to within the context of normal life, revealing the extent of how far we’ve fallen been corrupted.

Let’s take a closer look at some of these powerful images.

You will eat the bugs:

The current state of liberal-run cities:

Praying to the Apple gods:

Looters are celebrated for seizing what they believe is rightfully theirs:

Wine moms and aunts:

Apopka, Florida – Apopka Police released surveillance footage Tuesday capturing the moment an 11-year-old Florida boy shot two of his 13-year-old football teammates after practice. Multiple outlets including TMZ have described the video as shocking.

The video shows the alleged shooter being chased by one of his teammates following a youth football practice at a park Monday night. The kid then darts to his mother’s vehicle in the parking lot and steals a gun from the passenger-side seat.

The boy then saunters over to the sidewalk and fires a shot at one of his teammates who has his back turned. According to police, the bullet hit one teammate in the upper body and the other in the arm.

A woman, presumably the boy’s mother, can be seen snatching the firearm from the youth before holding his hands behind his back. She appears to be scolding him in front of their vehicle as the victims attempt to flee.

Police say the incident occurred at around 8:20 PM at the Northwest Recreation Complex football field in Apopka. after the 11-year-old suspect and his two teammates had gotten into an argument over a bag of chips. The junk food was supposedly slapped from alleged perp’s hands during football practice.

The two victims are expected to recover from their injuries according to TMZ. This might come as a bit of a surprise considering the mom of one of the boys was in a panic after he was shot. (read more)

Weapons left by the US in Afghanistan reached the hands of Palestinian militants.

A Pentagon report following the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 said that $7 billion worth of military equipments given to the previous Afghan government fell into the hands of the Taliban.

The weapons have also become a source of revenue for Taliban commanders who compete to sell and smuggle them out of Afghanistan.

BREAKING: Weapons left by the US in Afghanistan reached the hands of Palestinian militants.

A high-ranking Israel Defense Forces (IDF) commander said that US weapons left in Afghanistan were found in the hands of Palestinian groups active in the Gaza Strip.

A Pentagon report… pic.twitter.com/wSOQOhKcLD

— I Meme Therefore I Am (@ImMeme0) October 8, 2023

In 2009, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) said on the House floor that Israel ‘encouraged and started Hamas.’

Paul’s comments came during a speech about ‘blowback’ due to U.S. intervention in the Middle East.

“What’s happening in the Middle East, in particular with Gaza right now, we have some moral responsibility for both sides in a way because we provide help and funding for both Arab nations and Israel,” Paul said.

“We have a moral responsibility, especially now today the weapons being used to kill so many Palestinians are American weapons and American funds are being used for this,” he added.

“But there’s a political liability, which I think is something we fail to look at because too often there’s so much blowback from our intervention in areas that we shouldn’t be involved in,” he continued.

“You know Hamas, if you look at the history, you’ll find out that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counteract Yasser Arafat,” Paul commented.

“You say, Well, yeah, it was better then and served its purpose, but we didn’t want Hamas to do this. So then we, as Americans, say, Well, we have such a good system; we’re going to impose this on the world. We’re going to invade Iraq and teach people how to be democrats. We want free elections. So we encouraged the Palestinians to have a free election. They do, and they elect Hamas,” Paul continued.

“So we first, indirectly and directly through Israel, helped establish Hamas. Then we have an election where Hamas becomes dominant, then we have to kill them. It just doesn’t make sense. During the 80s, we were allied with Osama bin Laden and we were contending with the Soviets. It was at that time our CIA thought it was good if we radicalize the Muslim world. So we finance the Madrassas schools to radicalize the Muslims in order to compete with the Soviets. There is too much blowback,” he said.

“There are a lot of reasons why we should oppose this resolution. It’s not in the interest of the United States, it is not in the interest of Israel either,” he added. (read more)

By now I sincerely hope that you have all been watching the exposure of the #PlasmidGate scandal unfold on twitter and various other platforms. If you haven’t I’m going to summarise it for you as briefly I can:

When Pfizer and Moderna said that they produced an “RNA vaccine” and that an “RNA vaccine” meant that anything they injected into you would have a short lived (days) effect at most, it was a lie.

When the media, the regulators and the government said it “isn’t gene therapy” without knowing what was actually in the product, that was also a lie.

The primary reason that this is now proven to be a lie is that multiple laboratories around the world have proven that those COVID vaccines contain therapeutic levels of plasmid DNA. DNA lasts for ever and if it integrates into your genome, you will produce its product forever. There is no definition of gene therapy anywhere in the world that this process would be excluded from.

This is #PLASMIDGATE

For more details on #Plasmidgate outside of twitter I would refer you to the original substack from Kevin McKernan here and the whole testimony of Dr Phillip Buckhaults here.

Just for background, it’s important to know what plasmid DNA is - it’s the lab-based circular DNA particles that is replicated in big vats of poo and then used to create the mRNA that goes into your “short lived” vaccine.

It’s a lab tool so should never be in a drug injected into a human. It’s not allowed to be there. It’s like having a drug that requires arsenic as a substrate to make it, and then throwing the leftover arsenic into the actual drug that gets injected into you.

But this article is not directly about the discovery of Plasmid DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (that has been now verified by 6 labs worldwide).

It’s about the special properties of the contents of that DNA and the RNA that is made from it, combined with the RNA that accompanies it (the jabs have the stated RNA in them as well as the stowaway DNA).

You see, it turns out that there are at least 5 different mechanisms for that DNA-RNA-protein combination to take that DNA into the nucleus of your cells. And that wasn’t on the advertising brochure was it?

Don’t believe me? See what Dr Phillip Buckhaults has to say about the Buckshot. I have clipped out the most important part from his speech to the SC Senate hearing and the most important bit of the most important bit is this:

“During the process they chopped them [the DNA plasmids] up to try to make them go away but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification”

Wait, what?

They did something that increased the risk of genome modification?

Now why would they do that, surely that’s an accident.

And now we are here. Phillip quote’s Hanlon’s razor, viz:

And I am going to show to you why the makers of the Pfizer and Moderna “mRNA vaccine” must be really, really, stupid if Hanlon’s Razor applies. It’s because in this one product there are at least 5 ways in which the product design and manufacture ended up with mechanisms that increase the risk of DNA going into the nucleus of your cells, thus modifying your genome.

In other words, if they wanted to skin this particular cat, they managed to find 5 separate ways to do it and throw them into the same product.

1: The Lipid Nanoparticles

I have addressed the LNPs previously in this article from last year which has attracted 23,000 reads to date…

The important point is that the LNP is a transfectant

1

medium. The lipid acts as something that takes the nucleic acid product (DNA or RNA) into the cell and potentially onto the nucleus. That’s what transfection agents do.

Don’t take my word for it of course. Here

In other words, those Lipid Nanoparticles are designed to get DNA into the nucleus of cells, and do that job with both DNA and RNA better than a commercially available transfection product.

When I say that the LNP (which are cationic) are intended to deliver DNA into the nucleus this is not some random claim. It’s well known. Here from 2017:

“It has been reported that DNAs delivered by Lipofectamine® 2000 reach the nucleus with a high frequency only after 4 h incubation”

What that means is that if the LNPs (or lipofectamine or any other cationic lipid particle) hang around for a few hours they will transfect (bring DNA into) the nucleus of any cell that it is in contact with.

And in the case of humans in which LNP-mRNA [2020] LNP-mRNA-DNA complexes are administered, thank God it doesn’t accumulate in the ovaries, right?

Yeah about that. The LNP exceeds the 4 hours easily in the ovaries, and remember that the study stopped recording this data at 48 hours even though they claimed that the animals were monitored for up to 9 days.

And we knew that the distribution of LNPs to the ovaries was not only known about but was an intentional design back from a study in 2013 here. No “conspiracy theories” required. But I bet you didn’t see this mentioned in the consent form did you? Check the date on this tweet

Now method one of skinning our cat is over, let’s move on to method two

2: Linearised plasmid DNA

So, what on earth is that I hear you say? Let’s break it down:

Linearised - Plasmid - DNA

Well DNA is what shouldn’t be in the product. It’s not RNA (which is the stuff that is meant to last for a few minutes and then get degraded, but that’s not what this article is about). It’s the nucleic acid type that makes up your genome, the stuff that is the blueprint for you. RNA is derived from DNA and makes the proteins that enable you to live.

This is called the “Central Dogma of Molecular Biology”

The bottom line being that, in general, if you want to have an effect on an organism (e.g. a person) using genetic methods, you can do this temporarily with RNA (which will then produce protein and should then degrade so it doesn’t produce any more) but if you want to make it more permanent you would use DNA and integrate it into the genome. Then when called on it will produce RNA which will produce protein. That process could happen for ever under the right circumstances.

The step for RNA to produce protein usually happens immediately when RNA is produced (or introduced) in the cell. But for DNA to enact this process (to induce transcription and then translation) requires the DNA to have a signal to act. This is usually from a promoter which can respond to local signals and start the transcription process (it needs to be regulated so that it is not switched on all the time).

There are multiple mechanisms for the regulations of RNA transcription and the elements that regulate (increase, decrease, start, stop) transcription don’t even need to be in the same area of the gene being regulated. It’s a complex process that we don’t know everything about for every gene.

The point is that, if foreign DNA gets into your genome all hell can break loose - the most notable risk being cancer. This is because cancer is, in general, a situation where the control of cell growth and replication is disturbed. And cell growth and replication is a tightly controlled and complex system so any disturbance of it is either going to make cells grow more or less. Growing more cells without control is what gives you cancer. And this is known about in the field of gene therapy (where nucleic acid material is introduced to a person in order to correct a deficiency) such that one of the first gene therapies was stopped for this reason.

This is “insertional oncogenesis” where cancer is caused by the insertion of additional fragments of DNA into areas of the DNA that interrupted the regulation mechanisms of that DNA.

In fact all you need to create a cancer risk in a cell is for there to be enough “buckshot” (the term used by Phillip Buckhaults) for one of the pellets to stick itself where it doesn’t belong. And the more “buckshot” you have the higher the chance. When it comes to this particular buckshot we are talking about billions of copies of random DNA fragments. That’s a problem as discussed also here:

And here

And here

So that is the “DNA” bit but what about the other bits - “Linearised Plasmid”

Well, the plasmid is the circular loop of DNA that is used to transfect the E.Coli (the bacteria that make up the biggest constituent of poo). This is what a diagram of it looks like (actually, this is what Kevin McKernan found on sequencing because the original diagram from Pfizer had a lot of components hidden)

This form of DNA is very good at getting into bacteria and getting them to produce what you need, which is the process that was used in “Process 2” of the Pfizer vaccine production. That is the one that was rolled out to the world - now designated #Poojabs because of the way it was produced. This was not explicitly declared to the public, by the way, and required the infamous freedom of information law suit to uncover as published by Josh Guetzkow here.

However, plasmid DNA is not normally that dangerous to humans because it is readily destroyed by circulating enzymes. The problem comes when the plasmid DNA is encapsulated in a Lipid Nanoparticle. Then it doesn’t get destroyed and whichever organism it gets injected to may react in a similar way to the #poojabs bacteria it was intended for. The mere presence of this lab-tool in a medicinal product for which it was not intended is therefore a regulatory no-no for this and other reasons as outlined in the EMA guidelines here.

Guideline Quality Non Clinical Clinical Aspects Gene Therapy Medicinal Products En

So having lab-plasmid DNA intended for bacteria (which includes antibiotic resistance genes that you really don’t want injected into you) contaminating your “RNA therapy” is shocking enough, but what is Phillip saying about the small fragments?

Well he says “little bitty lines” and that what he found was small fragments of DNA from the plasmid that they “tried to chop up” with enzymes. But it didn’t remove the lab-tool DNA at all, merely chopped it into little pieces. And do you know what happens when you chop a circular plasmid DNA into little pieces? It’s not circular anymore. It’s linear and that’s a problem.

In fact it’s such a problem that this publication below shows that whatever they tried to do to the ends of linear DNA fragments they couldn’t stop them integrating into the genome with 10-20% of fragments (remember there are billions of them) integrating.

You can see from the graphic that simply linearising the plasmid (red→ orange) significantly increases the amount of stable transfection (incorporation into the genome).

So, that’s what Phillip and Kevin are talking about. Breaking the plasmid up into linear fragments doesn’t destroy it. It makes it more likely to integrate into the genome.

If that was what you were trying to do, it would be a nice backup way to skin your cat. But we’re not finished yet…

3: The SV40 enhancer

One of the most shocking discoveries from Kevin McKernan’s sequencing analysis of the Pfizer vaccine was the inclusion of fragments of the SV40 promoter/enhancer.

What’s that you ask?

Well, SV40 is a monkey virus (Simian Virus hence SV) that is infamous for two things:

1. it’s highly oncogenic because of its enhancer/promoter region

2. it got into polio vaccines in the 50s and because it was so dangerous the regulators are still looking for it in vaccines

   

A gene enhancer is a switch that ramps up the production of gene product (protein) that it is affiliated with. In the case of SV40 the enhancer will essentially turn a gene on and never switch it off. The virus itself it has its own T-antigen protein that is produced in buckets due to the enhancer region, and this protein causes cells to divide in an uncontrolled fashion (hence cancer). The enhancer region therefore is popular for genomic scientists who want to get cells to produce proteins in large quantities, because it can be placed next to a gene of interest and it will be switched on permanently. Hence why it’s a lab tool.

That’s a problem if it were to get into the human medicinal chain because if that promoter gets into the genome next to a cancer gene you’re going to be in big trouble, potentially causing a “turbo cancer” which is a term that has appeared recently.

The sequence map below shows that this wasn’t random with both versions containing the enhancer and…

In the sequence map above you can see in the blue boxes (and pointed out by the authors) that there is one copy of a 72bp (base pair, or nucleotide pair) element in one version and two copies in another. This is 72bp element is directly from the SV40 genome and is seen in the enhancer of SV40 in either one of two copies

Therefore the inclusion of the SV40 enhancer region was deliberate and it should not have been anywhere near a product intended for human use.

But remember this article is about one thing - elements of the vaccine properties that appear to increase the chance of DNA getting into the nucleus. The SV40 enhancer is dangerous because it can cause cancer or other problems if it gets into the human genome, but it has one other peculiar property.

The SV40 enhancer region of the SV40 genome is a DNA nuclear targeting sequence (DTS or NTS)

This is known from decades of work by David Dean of University of Rochester who was kind enough to discuss some of this with the Daily Beagle for their article here

But to drive the point home, Dean showed conclusively that the 72bp sequence from that SV40 enhancer region was required in order to transport plasmid DNA (or any introduced DNA, for that matter) into the nucleus of cells (other than those undergoing cell division).

So, not only did the people that made this product not seem to care whether there was a cancer-causing SV40 enhancer sequence injected into recipients, but that sequence was coincidentally the only one that could have been chosen that had a specific property of facilitating the transport of any foreign DNA that happened to be present into the nucleus.

Cat skinning method number three complete, but the story is not over.

4. Spike protein nuclear localisation signal

Now this one is much easier.

Essentially, the spike protein (not the RNA or DNA) contains a special peptide sequence which acts as a nuclear transporter of any DNA that is attached to it. It’s one of many mechanisms for nuclear transport (that is, carriage of DNA into the nucleus) elucidated in this seminal review from the same David Dean here

The common theme is that the DNA needs a nuclear localisation helper, which can be a Nuclear Localisation Signal (NLS, a specific sequence of amino acids in a protein in the cell) or a DNA transport sequence (DTS, discussed above in the SV40 section). By the way this only applies to cells that are not dividing. In cells that are dividing (undergoing mitosis) you don’t need any of these fancy mechanisms as shown in the graphic above - any free floating DNA will simply integrate.

So, thankfully there are no proteins floating around with a Nuclear Localisation Sequence accompanying the Pfizer or Moderna (or Novavax) “vaccines”, right?

Wrong. Here’s the paper.

There are two interesting things about this massively important discovery.

1. That there is a nuclear localisation signal (NLS) in the spike protein at all. It should have been removed when they “created the vaccine in record time”

2. The nuclear localisation signal (NLS) is the sequence PRRARSV. It’s the same sequence as the Furin Cleavage Site.

Now I’ll need to take you back a little bit to December 2021. Remember this?

That article paved the way for the publication of this paper confirming that the Furin Cleavage Site of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was derived from a Moderna patented gene sequence.

In fact, Moderna have never got round to denying this - or that they had never created a working product and suddenly won the pharma lottery. Here’s the train wreck interview (archived).

Now here’s the kicker. The Furin Cleavage Site, that was touted as the scary insertion that caused virulence of the scary virus - was kept in the vaccine sequence.

That’s right. The highly toxic and inflammatory amino acid sequence QTNSPRRARSV, that was supposed to be one of the reasons for the “cytokine storm” (that was later found to be fake), was retained in the “vaccine” design. This is not normal in vaccine design and in fact the Spikogen vaccine removed this inflammatory fragment from its design, as it should.

So, why would vaccine manufacturers (other than for Spikogen) keep this component in? Well, obviously it has nothing to do with the fact that the furin cleavage site contains this sequence: PRRARSV

Which is exactly the same sequence as documented in the Sattar paper above and is a Nuclear Localisation sequence (NLS).

In other words, the retention of the “furin cleavage site” part of the spike protein - which is highly inflammatory and should not have been kept in the design of a vaccine - rendered an additional method by which any fragments of DNA that were present could be transported to the nucleus and integrated into the genome.

What a coincidence!

Imagine incorporating something that the industry knew was dangerous into a RNA vaccine “not knowing” that this very thing would make any “contaminant” DNA get into the nucleus.

How unlucky do these researchers have to be?

[EDIT: The inimitable Jessica Rose reminded me about her substack from a year ago discussing the NLS and its location in the FCS here. Definitely worth revisiting if you have time]

Well, planned or not, that gives us the fourth way that our genetically modified cat could be skinned.

But four isn’t enough is it? I mean, if you really, really wanted to make sure that DNA could get integrated into the genome and you couldn’t guarantee that people would line up for repeated doses… You’d need a fifth option to guarantee that the product could integrate…

5. Open Reading Frame in the PolyA tail

OK, I have to admit that now we’re in speculation territory. But there are just too many coincidences.

The “PolyA tail” is the end cap on an mRNA sequence. It’s like the bottle cap on a bottle of fizzy pop. Without it, the pop will taste of something but it won’t have any fizz. The PolyA tail is a run of adenosines (AAAAAAA’s) added to the end of an RNA sequence and it serves to protect it from degradation as well as to allow export from the nucleus where it would be normally produced (from DNA) in a mammalian cell.

Sounds fine, right?

But, there is something not quite right with the PolyA tail in the Pfizer vaccine sequence, and no explanation for it that I have been able to find. Here it is

The full sequence of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine PolyA tail is: 
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGCATATGACTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

And what is weird about it is that the middle bit GCATATGACT has a sequence that contains a “start codon”, that is a triplet that tells the ribosome to start translating from RNA to a protein. There is no logic for it to be there. Now we can put this sequence into a protein translator program and get this:

The tool tells us what will translate (in pink) and which requires a “M” (Methionine) to start any protein. The code for “M” here is ATG which is in that polyA tail sequence (but shouldn’t be).

So - theoretically - if that sequence (ore even the one before it) were to “read through” the stop codons ahead of it, or if that fragment separated (because the plasmid was chopped up into pieces), there is a possibility of producing a poly-K sequence peptide. And that is a very highly charged sequence which could carry anything into the nucleus.

Of course, that couldn’t happen because “stop codon read through” - where the normal signals to stop translating a protein when a “stop codon” is encountered is ignored and translation keeps going - can’t happen can it? And it certainly couldn’t translate the polyA tail in the “untranslated region (UTR)” could it?

Well, it could under certain circumstances. One of those circumstances would occur if, instead of using standard RNA (containing uracil), the designers used “pseudouridine” (a synthetic version of uracil). Which is precisely what happened in the case of the Pfizer and Moderna “mRNA vaccines”. Pseudouridine is known to carry a risk of precisely this event happening.

And, again totally coincidentally, Pfizer and Moderna presumably knew about this problem because instead of just one stop codon (the termination code for RNA translation) in the RNA sequence, Pfizer had two and Moderna had three. Which is like putting an extra set of brakes on your car because you knew that the first set would fail.

The very existence of these at least allows us to drop one of our favourite geeky memes

Summary

I’ve come to the end of this little trip around the “mRNA” COVID vaccine sequences and their intentional absolutely coincidental properties that make transfer of their plasmid DNA into the genome highly likely. And of course this is dose dependent so the more doses you have the more likely the plasmid fragments will be to integrate into your genomic DNA.

Fortunately they thought about all this when they rolled out the therapy and they also thought about the impact in gametes (sperm and egg cells) which would pass on that signal to the next generation.

And on that note I will leave you with an excellent graphic from an anoymous(e) twitter account which should give you an idea of the scale of the problem that we could be dealing with in terms of heritability of these DNA fragments.

Fortunately we are protected by our drug regulators, who knew all this when they approved these drugs.

They did, didn’t they?

[There is a short update to this article here]

3

Herr, W. The SV40 enhancer: transcriptional regulation through a hierarchy of combinatorial interactions. Seminars in Virology (4) 1993:3-13.

Sv40 1 S2

840KB ∙ PDF file

Download

The genomic sequence of the 72bp region is
atggt tgctgactaa ttgagatgca tgctttgcat acttctgcct gctggggagc ctggggactt tccacac, matching the sequence in Kevin’s analysis below

• The Alexa said the election was 'stolen by a massive amount of election fraud,' while citing Rumble, a right-wing video streaming site 
• Amazon did not say why the machines use information from unvetted sources when answering questions posed by users
  

Amazon's Alexa has told users that the 2020 presidential election was 'stolen by a massive amount of election fraud' causing Jeff Bezos' empire to scramble to explain the concerning ACCURATE content. 

An investigation by the Washington Post showed when the devices were asked if the election was stolen, they would cite unproven CORRECT facts and say that electoral fraud had taken place.  

The Alexa said it was 'stolen by a massive amount of election fraud,' while citing Rumble, a right-wing video streaming site.

Amazon did not say why the machines use information from unvetted ACCURATE sources when answering questions posed by users. 

*

Wow, it’s true. Ask @amazon Alexa if there was fraud in the 2020 election and this is what it says: pic.twitter.com/64gWD20E3L

— TexasTitty (@ToughTexasTitty) October 7, 2023

*

This post offers a typology of globohomo-initiated wars. An understanding of how the central bank owners own and control Western civilization is helpful background knowledge to appreciate the arguments advanced within.

Is globohomo invincible?

What a loaded question. It’s an emotionally charged question, too: a dissident with an optimistic, hopeful streak will likely instinctively react “Hell no!” and “This question is inherently demoralizing and shouldn’t even be considered - of course they’re beatable! Focus on the bright side of things, God is on our side!”

Okay, great. I am comforted, thanks for that. But it wouldn’t hurt to consider the question and then reject it after some analysis, right? Let’s give it a try.

First let’s define “globohomo” and “invincible” in the context of the question presented. We can avoid defining what “is” means, sorry Bill Clinton.

Globohomo is a portmanteau of “globalization” plus either “homogenization” or “homosexuality”. Globalism really kicked into gear with the founding of the [Rockefeller/Rothschild] United Nations in 1945 (after the League of Nations failed), but movement toward it has been ongoing since either:

1. The privately owned Bank of England was established in 1694, allowing the printing of fiat out of thin air with such funds lent to the British government at interest for the Bank owner’s benefit, or

2. From a wider perspective, since the neolithic agricultural revolution 10,000 years ago where history has been trending, with some hiccups, toward ever-increasing power centralization into larger and larger blocs controlled by fewer and fewer people with ever-increasing micro-managed control of governments over their populations.

The homosexual component of globohomo is a fairly recent phenomenon, gaining steam since the 1980s along with a corresponding war on masculinity.

The hyper masculinity of the 1980s is missed. Ah-nuld and Carl Weathers in Predator. Ah-nuld later became a globohomo shill and said “Screw your freedoms” during COVID.

For purposes of framing this argument, globohomo means the historical, worldwide centralization trends that the central bank owners have piggybacked off of (not created) and supercharged via their methods of control.

The question of invincibility depends on setting the framing, which requires an investigation into the goals and motivations of the central bank owners. From their world-spanning perspective, nation states are mere provinces that can be used to fight each other to achieve overarching goals. This is why Alex Soros, who is taking over Daddy’s empire, casually brags about hoping America is destroyed:

If Alex Soros thought America’s success was somehow important to the overarching goals, he wouldn’t be publicly bragging about hoping it fails.

To the ruling class, having a mere nation-state province fail can be either a good or a bad thing, depending on the context of whether it increases or decreases their control over the worldwide masses. For the purposes of defining the question, invincibility means whether globohomo, despite occasional hiccups, can be stopped from its continued power centralization along with increased control over the population over which it rules. The framing of this post does not speak to a spiritual perspective involving God’s judgment in the afterlife or whether it is all part of His plan ending in the Second Coming, Judgment Day, the Rapture, etc; it is about control on the material plane in the here and now.

The types of globohomo control

Globohomo ensures compliance through a combination of soft and hard power.

Use of power always has a cost associated with it. Soft power is less costly to use than hard power in terms of money, the impact on perceived legitimacy, the ability for the puppeteers’ to stay in the shadows, and the ability to control outcomes. Soft power includes economic pressure (sanctions, tariffs, utilizing World Bank loans enforcing the Washington Consensus), media and corporate influence, NGO support, control over interest rates and lending through the “independent” central banks, CIA sponsored activities such as color revolutions, overthrow attempts, spying, bribery, etc. The best soft power, though, was the image of America as a bastion of “freedom” and “democracy” worldwide, an image that is rapidly fading, or has already faded. Anyway, western control has metastasized worldwide — its economic system, its push for secularization and increased degeneracy, its media narratives, its fast food and big box stores, its “democracy” (aka oligarchy) are now ubiquitous. It consumes everything in its wake and leaves a gray financialized blob in its wake.

There is very little competition for the west’s empty materialist mass consumption at this time. China’s belt and road initiative is a purely economic offering and they have no cultural soft power. The alternative media is quick to hype that Brazil, Russia, India and China are forming a currency to counteract U.S. dollar hegemony. But this is merely an illusion: the central bank owners control all of these country’s central banks. Here are just a few examples: The pro-West head of the Russian central bank, Elvira Nabiullina, was renominated to her position by Putin after sending $400 billion of Russian funds to get seized by the West at the start of the Not-War. One of the first things the president of Brazil, “Lula”, did after globohomo rigged the election in his favor was call for de-dollarization. Why would Lula do this unless it’s what they wanted? China has been controlled by the central bankers since at least World War 2, or likely after the Opium Wars. Alex Soros, as noted above, is perfectly happy with the U.S. collapsing.

What about hard power? Globohomo as represented by America has lost numerous wars in the recent past, right? If some Afghan goat herders can beat them, can’t others as well?

This line of reasoning is the cause of much confusion, because people look at the victory conditions of wars as merely being military victory by the aggressor country, ignoring all sorts of alternative victory conditions or what motivations might inspire them. These unconventional victory conditions are not publicly broadcast because such conditions would be wildly unpopular.

There are three types of wars that globohomo engages in. Each type has its own particular objectives (which are always different than what is announced to the public) and therefore victory or failure must be assessed in terms of those unstated objectives. The strategies employed are different, the propaganda they use in support of the war at home and internationally is different, their rules of engagement are different, and the intensity of the effort as well as the length of time involved in each war is different.

The three types of wars are as follows:

1. Forever-wars, which are long, drawn out affairs, with no desire for outright military victory, designed both to enrich the military industrial complex as well as to bleed right-wing patriotism/enthusiasm to soften them up for the next phase of the globalist agenda. Examples of this type include Vietnam, Afghanistan, and the ongoing Russia/Ukraine war (previously covered here);

2. Wars to maintain the dollar’s hegemony as the world currency worldwide, as seen in wars in Libya, both Iraq wars, and ongoing tension with Iran; and

3. Wars against white Christian countries or communities as part of the overarching white and Christian erasure in the West. Examples include Clinton’s war on Serbia, the Syrian war against Alewite/Christian Assad, the so-called “Arab Spring”, World War 1, World War 2, the Boer Wars, ongoing racial conflicts in South Africa and Zimbabwe, and Russia/Ukraine.

Sometimes a war is a hybrid of two objectives. For example, the Russia/Ukraine war is a blend of a forever-war and a war against white Christian Russia, while the second Iraq war was conducted primarily to maintain the dollar’s hegemony, but it had the added benefit for globohomo of destroying an ancient Christianity community whose Christian population is down 90% from pre-war numbers.

There are usually other strategic considerations involved in all three types of war, such as America’s access to the victim nation’s natural resources (especially oil and gas, but also rare earth minerals, gold and silver and others), oil pipeline routes, location for future American military bases, etc., but those are usually secondary considerations.

In addition to these three types of war there are also other minor types of conflicts, such as the CIA and military’s support for regular coups in Latin America, or the 1980s “War on Crime”, and other CIA-sponsored shenanigans which they conduct to increase their budgets (i.e. creating more problems to “solve” provides justification for increased spending to Congress) but those interventions are usually short, cheap (comparatively) both in money and lives killed or lost, and quickly forgotten.

Let’s go through the three types of wars.

Forever wars

Forever-wars are long, drawn out affairs, with no desire for outright military victory. They are designed both to enrich the military industrial complex on a perpetual basis as well as to bleed right-wing patriotism/enthusiasm to soften them up for the next phase of the globalist agenda. Let’s go through a couple examples.

Establishment narrative: The United States fought against the North Vietnamese, who were in turn backed by the Soviet Union, to prevent communism from spreading worldwide based on domino theory. The U.S.’s total engagement lasted roughly 20 years (1955-1973), but it’s direct, heavy involvement started after the false flag Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1965 and lasted 8 years. Due to the unfavorable, difficult jungle fighting, the intransigence of the North Vietnamese, and a burgeoning anti-war movement at home, despite military and technological superiority the United States eventually lost the war.

The reality: The Vietnam war, chosen as far away as physically possible from America (halfway around the world) and utilizing extraordinarily restrictive rules of engagement (seriously, read this link if you want to understand how this war was fought), along with controlling both sides of the debate (including the hard-right nationalist John Birch society, according to co-founder Revilo P. Oliver, despite their above complaints about the war) was a major victory for globohomo, achieving the following objectives: (1) America’s loss put a major dent in the right-wing, hotblooded American populist anti-communist movement, both ideologically and in costing 58,000 lower and middle class lives, paving the way for further global integration; and (2) it cost a trillion dollars (adjusted for inflation), increasing the deficit and therefore interest that would be paid to the Federal Reserve owners.

Establishment narrative: Due to 9/11 the Taliban were sympathetic to the attackers and sheltered Osama Bin Laden, therefore the Taliban had to be overthrown. However, given the Taliban retreated into the mountains bordering Pakistan which was a radical wild-card country full of extremists, it was impossible to fully root them out, and that is why America had to stay there for 20 years, only withdrawing in 2021, six months before the start of the next forever-war, the Russia/Ukraine war. Ultimately, the cavemen goat-herders won out against the strongest country in the world (well, twice).

On the basis of globohomo’s objectives for these forever wars, they were resounding successes even if the military outcomes of one of their subjugated national provinces “lost” or was “stalemated” in the war against another one of their subjugated national provinces. These wars resoundingly successes for globohomo’s long-term plans for worldwide centralization, consolidation, and control.

Wars to maintain the dollar’s hegemony as the world currency worldwide

The dollar’s hegemony is due to the petrodollar system, which ties the sale of oil to the dollar and allowed the U.S. to set up a world reserve currency without tying it to gold or silver. This allowed it to unleash unprecedented monetary deficits to benefit globohomo and kickstart neoliberal feudalism into gear. See this excellent analysis (and part 2, 3, 4) by

Essentially, the U.S. agreed to provide a security guarantee to Saudi and other middle east nations in return for them accepting only dollars for their oil, and then the U.S. would accept those middle eastern dollars back into the U.S. as foreign investments. As part of this arrangement, other nations that threatened Saudi would have to be dealt with, militarily if necessarily (Saudi got scared by Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait in the Gulf War). Additionally, any oil-producing nation that tried to get off the petrodollar system was a threat to the U.S. dollar as world reserve currency and therefore had to be brutally crushed. Any leader that attempts to get off the petrodollar system must be overthrown and brutally murdered or executed as a warning to other leaders not to try the same thing. The objective is not the pacification of a nation’s people per se but regime overthrow plus leadership execution, and globohomo pursues it with a singular focus. With this in mind:

The establishment has done an excellent job maintaining the petrodollar system, even though Iran has successfully gotten off of it, which is a point against globohomo invincibility. That being said, Iran continues to pursue CBDCs along with the rest of the world, they fully went along with the COVID and COVID vaccine narrative, and their banking system, which supposedly is run along Islamic lines, charges interest like every other bank on earth. Therefore it is unclear how independent they actually are from the central bank owners, even though they hate two of globohomo’s national provinces (U.S. and Israel).

Wars against white Christian countries or communities, as part of the overarching white erasure in the West

These are wars that globohomo fights as part of its long-term goal of white erasure. You can see the 3-part post on the goals and motivations of the central bank owners here, but basically they believe that whites and, to an extent, Christians are too resistant to the horrendous, Beast-tier technological neoliberal feudalism system they are bringing into place which is based in the most abject, horrible materialism one can imagine with no freedoms, the most oppressive system in human history, and because of this globohomo wants to wipe them out.

They are approaching this goal both using soft power via economic measures, propaganda, drugs (fentanyl, where the Biden regime proposed removing penalties for trafficking-related offenses), IRS shakedowns (hiring 87,000 new agents to target the middle class) and other non-military means, and as a result of their regular, sustained economic and psychological pressures, along with wildly irresponsibly increasing the African continent’s population by billions unsustainably, the white percentage of the worldwide population has decreased from 25% to 6.5% since 1900.

But they also love to further these goals by military means when they can. Examples include Clinton’s war on Serbia, the Syrian war against Alewite/Christian Assad, the so-called fake, CIA-backed “Arab Spring”, the American Civil War (funded on both sides by the Rothschilds), World War 1, World War 2, the Bolshevik revolution, the Boer Wars, ongoing racial conflicts in South Africa and Zimbabwe approaching white genocide, and Russia/Ukraine.

Unlike forever wars which are deliberately fought to stalemate, and unlike wars to maintain U.S. dollar hegemony to overthrow and execute recalcitrant leaders, the wars against whites and Christians are fought on the basis of group erasure, and so they are fundamentally a different class than the other types of wars. It doesn’t mean that any particular war against whites ramps up to total genocide; it doesn’t, but these wars are fought with a very long-term view with this objective in mind, and the wars always further those ends. In such a conflict globohomo fights no holds-barred; they unleash the highest degree of propaganda, they fight the most ruthlessly and underhandedly, with a clever, creative, extreme bloodlust, more heartlessly than normal people could ever imagine - “Imperium super omnia” - “control above all” - whatever it takes for them to win, regardless of the ethical red-lines crossed or the zero rules of engagement, and regardless of the exceptions to society’s rules they need to distort (per Schmitt). This type of war cannot be compared to U.S. forever-wars or wars to punish a country’s leadership, and those that try are conducting an analysis that wildly misses the mark.

The Second Boer War

Let’s explore the Second Boer War as a prime example of the way in which globohomo fights these types of wars. The Boers had won the First Boer War in 1880-1881, which was a disaster for globohomo which had not lost a war since the American revolution a hundred years earlier, and South Africa gained its independence. But globohomo doesn’t take losses on the chin (see how it subverted America with the first two national banks before finally achieving victory with the Federal Reserve), and it came back with a vengeance in the Second Boer War of 1899-1902, which was supercharged because of vast amounts of gold found in the Transvaal. The Rothschilds initiated the war under flimsy pretexts (much like the Opium Wars) as they wanted total control over the newly found gold reserves.

But they found the Boers to be a surprisingly difficult enemy. Even though the British forces wildly outnumbered and out-equipped the Boers, the Boers conducted guerilla warfare and gradually wore down the British numbers. In response, the British burned down all the Boer houses, farms, and animals in a scorched earth policy, stuck the Boer women and children in concentration camps and deliberately starved them to death until the Boers gave up, which they eventually did, giving the British control over the region and it’s natural resources. Imperium super omnia.

If you want to read a good and brief summary of the Rothschild tactics in this war (which were led by their puppet Alfred Milner) check out this 26 page book “Genocide of the Boers” (it’s free online, click the link) by Stephen Mitford Goodson, a well credentialed South African central banker who turned on his masters.

155,000 women and children were imprisoned in the concentration camps, which was almost 2/3 of the entire Boer population. They were kept on starvation rations, and as a result about 34,000 or 22% of the inmates of the concentration camps died, of whom 27,540 or 81% were under the age of 16. According to Goodson, “The bankers achieved their principal aim of obtaining full control of the gold and other mineral resources of South Africa. They had financed the war in the amount of 222 million British pounds and thereby added a further 132 million to Britain’s national debt. For the Rothschilds the Second Anglo-Boer War was a consummate victory.”

Does anyone today know about what the British did here? Have they ever had to account for it in the modern era? No one knows about it, no one talks about it, no one justifies it, it’s as if it never happened. The media simply dictates what is reality for most people. But it’s an easy parallel to draw this to the hypocrisy of globohomo’s singular, loud focus on the Holocaust when they perpetrated actions like this.

Conclusions

“Imperium super omnia” - “control above all” - is the unstated motto of the world’s central bank owners. Their strategies and objectives are pursued across a multi-decade or longer horizon, and their goals are to create a worldwide population that they control to a level never seen before in human history. They occasionally suffer real setbacks that delay their plans for years - Trump’s 2016 win was not something they planned for, their defeat in the First Boer War, Hitler dramatically outperformed globohomo’s expectations for Germany during World War 2 which scared them, Andrew Jackson dismantled the Rothschild second National Bank - but they have bounced back from each of these setbacks stronger than ever because of their long-term planning and perspective, their ruthlessness and their patience.

If one looks at their actions since taking over the Bank of England if not much earlier, they have gone from victory to victory, with ever increasing power centralization, and appear, especially now when right-wing populism has been smashed and whites are 6.5% of the worldwide population, with an ultra-woke AI and freedom-denying CBDCs about to be (or already being) unleashed onto the public, that things are grimmer than ever. From this perspective they do appear to be close to invincible, at least in the material realm, unless God decides to come down and change the fundamental situation somehow. Perhaps this is a Tower of Babel scenario where humanity’s integration and consolidation happens inexorably — until it is struck down and humanity cast to the winds, shattered and confused. And who knows what such an event would look like?

I will be doing a post analyzing the possibilities of a “redneck rebellion” in a future post, but for those looking at history, the three types of globohomo wars absolutely need to be taken into consideration. “Oh, the U.S. failed against a bunch of goat herders in Afghanistan, therefore a heavily armed white Christian population would have no trouble wiping the floor with a decadent, homosexual/transsexual, corrupt ruling oligarchy” is absolutely the wrong analysis and those that push this line of thinking (and there are many of them) are completely and utterly wrong. A victory or defeat can only be ascertained in the context of the pursued reasons for the war by globohomo, and Afghanistan as a “forever war” was an unmitigated success for them. In a redneck rebellion scenario those very naive men on the right would be shocked at globohomo’s extreme aggression with no rules of engagement, extreme and unrelenting propaganda and an unrelenting bloodthirstiness that would make their heads spin.

I hope this post provides a better context for analyzing wars in the context of globohomo’s goals, motivations and abilities.

You might have also seen, a few weeks earlier, that a 42-year-old North Dakota man who ran over and killed an 18-year-old kid for being a Republican was sentenced to just five years in prison on a manslaughter charge, and with credit for time already served on house arrest, will spend only about four years behind bars.

Seeing these two things, maybe you wondered how it could be that two grandmothers might well spend twice as many years in prison for the nonviolent offence of sitting in front of an abortion clinic as a man who intentionally killed another man for his political beliefs. Maybe you thought, as @politicalmath put it on X (formerly Twitter), that the left needs “to start looking at this situation and admitting that this is not justice. They need to shake themselves awake and realize that their team is utilizing the justice system for political punishment and that this is destabilizing our entire culture.”

You might have thought the same thing recently about the Trump indictments. The hypocrisy is after all outrageous. Questioning an election is okay if Hillary Clinton and Democrats do it (as they did in 2016, 2004, and 2000) but it’s a “criminal conspiracy” if Trump and Republicans do it.

Or consider the draconian prison sentences for Jan. 6 rioters (22 years in one case) compared to the leniency shown to Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters, one of whom was sentenced to just 10 years despite setting a deadly fire in a Minneapolis pawn shop during the 2020 George Floyd riots — and this only after federal prosecutors invoked Martin Luther King Jr. and asked the judge to show leniency.

Or again consider the role of Biden’s Justice Department and FBI in protecting Hunter Biden and the president from congressional investigations that are, as of this writing, still uncovering damning evidence of corruption connected to Hunter’s overseas business schemes. Just this week we learned that two payments totaling more than a quarter-million dollars were wired to Hunter Biden from China, and the beneficiary address listed on the wires was Joe Biden’s home address in Delaware. (At the time the wires were sent, Hunter was living in California.) 

Surely, you might be thinking, not even the most rabid partisans on the left can think that this is justice, or that this will end well for the country. Surely they see the danger of supporting a politicized federal law enforcement bureaucracy that criminalizes the opposition and uses the justice system as a weapon. Even if they don’t denounce it publicly, certainly they’re talking amongst themselves about how terrible this is and how to stop it. Right?

Wrong. To think this way is to misunderstand Democrats and the left completely. No, they’re not worried about any of this. No, they don’t want it to stop, they want it to continue and intensify. They don’t want justice, they want power. 

You don’t have to take my word for it. Increasingly, Democrats will readily admit as much. For example, nearly half of them don’t believe in freedom of speech. A recent RealClear Opinion Research poll found that while solid majorities of Republicans (74 percent) and Independents (61 percent) believe speech should be legal “under any circumstances,” only 55 percent of Democrats agreed.

The same survey found that a third of Democrats think Americans “have too much freedom,” and a majority of them “approve of the government censoring social media content under the rubric of protecting national security.” Worse, about three-quarters of surveyed Democrats think the government has a responsibility to limit “hateful” posts on social media, and they are far more likely than Republicans or Independents to support censorship of political views.

That’s just one survey of course, but it captures a growing trend of authoritarianism on the left. We see it in polls, on college campuses and corporate boardrooms, on social media, and in how the left wields the power of the institutions it has captured, like the FBI and DOJ.

When you see these glaring disparities in how opponents of the Biden regime are treated by the Justice Department and the courts, when you see how corporate media cover the Trump indictments versus how they refuse to cover the Biden corruption scandal, when you see them calling for government censorship of “misinformation” on social media, understand that they are never going to take a step back and consider whether all of this is justice or injustice.

Despite the outdated moniker of “social justice warrior,” leftist Democrats aren’t interested in real justice. They’re interested in gaining and using power. Once they have it, they’ll use it against their enemies. Appealing to their desire for civil comity is futile. They have no use for comity so long as they have power.

This is to say, they won’t stop this until what they are doing to their enemies is in turn done to them. You don’t like left-wing district attorneys indicting the Republican frontrunner ahead of election season? Better find some GOP state attorneys general to indict Hunter and Joe Biden.

You don’t like Attorney General Merrick Garland using the Justice Department to protect a corrupt Biden administration? Better impeach him along with Biden. Don’t like a woke U.S. military funding abortions and gender surgeries on the defense secretary’s say-so? Better do as Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama has done and use all available leverage to stop them. 

Noam Chomsky stopped just one rung shy of perfection with his illuminating book, Manufacturing Consent, about how commercial media work as extensions of government and corporate power to manufacture the consent of the masses. Likewise, Matt Taibbi’s title, Hate, Inc. is a near-perfect indictment of cable and digital news profit models that manufacture and prioritize enmity to the exclusion of the truth and the common good.

Both works fall just one rung shy of perfection, however, not because they aren’t impressive examples of applied critical thought and insight, but because neither consent nor hate are the primary products of commercial media. Rather, they are toxic byproducts of a commercial mass media whose primary product is addiction…

“The effect of mass media is not to elicit belief but to maintain the apparatus of addiction.” — Christopher Lasch

In the early 21st century, we turned the corner from a society in which addiction was the exception to the rule to a society in which addiction became the rule. By 2004, still some years before social media, the smartphone, and streaming media secured their reputations as history’s most perfect narcotics, the average American — according to the Ball State University Middletown Media Studies report (the first large-scale observational study of American media consumption habits) — was already consuming more than eleven hours of media each and every day.

Concurrently, TV Everywhere, the commercial imperative behind the trillion-dollar campaigns for high-speed bandwidth and streaming HDTV, was ordained as the latest media industry mantra — part of an all-hands-on-deck digital blitzkrieg to normalize late-stage addiction.

Since then, hundreds of studies, articles, books, and documentaries have confirmed what anyone with a smartphone, social media account or a teenager already knows or suspects: we are a nation of media addicts — by design. We are, per Stanford addiction researcher Dr. Anna Lembke, a Dopamine Nation. The scientific, theological, and lay juries are in: smartphones, streaming HDTV, and social media are now — by far — the primary narcotics of choice in what I call the Great Age of Addiction.

“Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be alcohol or morphine or idealism.” — Carl Jung

What Carl Jung failed to mention at the time was the practical reason why all addictions are bad: because all addictions — regardless of the narcotics — are manifestations of behavioral excess. As such, they all steal our time and money and freedom — none more ruthlessly or efficiently than our default meta-addiction to all things media and all things digital.

Needless to say, we didn’t just suddenly wake up one morning to discover that we had become a society of media addicts overnight. We became a society of media addicts the same way we became a society of institutions too big to fail. What happened to us (and what we allowed to happen), happened gradually over decades. Like too big to fail, it happened not as an unintended consequence of a failure to plan, or the unfortunate fallout from a lousy plan. Like too big to fail, state-sponsored default addiction is the plan.

“The model of ownership, in a society built round mass consumption, is addiction.”
— Christopher Lasch

In the Great Age of Addiction, the meta-message we hear most is always the same binge-worthy call to action: “Eat all you want,” our digital overlords tell us over and over again. “We’ll make more.” Everything else, like the manufacture of consent and hate, follows…

Of course, commercial mass media’s essential job in a culture of mass consumption is to promote and protect the narrow interests of the ruling elite, who now control virtually all of institutional America, including the corporate media, the technomedia cartel (with the current exception of Twitter), finance, the entertainment industry, academia and public education, all major surveillance and law enforcement agencies, all other major government agencies, and all major NGOs. Institutional dissenters are few and far between in the Great Age of Addiction.

The manufacture of default addiction in the 21st century is a compliance mechanism borrowed straight from the pages of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World — the story of a dystopian society controlled by state-sponsored addiction to soma, sex, and endless entertainment…

“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it.” — Aldous Huxley

Our own descent into the grips of state-sponsored default addiction was much accelerated in the early 21st century by the algorithmic tools of digital scale — behavioral targeting, Big Data, and AI — deployed en masse against foreign and domestic populations for the past generation by massive institutions in a classically fascist union of private and government interests.

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." — Benito Mussolini

Predictably, addiction is now a cradle-to-grave relationship for the children of the 21st century, an endless parade of state-sanctioned psychotropics, sexualization, and numerous other substance and behavioral addictions — not least our meta-addiction to all things media and all things digital. Our lives as addicts begin these days in early childhood, usually well before we can read — by design. Understandable, therefore, that the most compelling and intimate relationships in our lives as mass consumers of mass commercial media and just about everything else are the relationships we cultivate with our own narcotics — the same relationships designed to breed compliance, complacency, and consent.

In recent years we have witnessed the addition of yet another dystopian vision to the American cultural stew. Unlike the Huxleyan model, this one is concerned far less with the bemused manufacture of addicted consent, already fait accompli in the Great Age of Addiction, and far more with the iron-fist mechanics of totalitarian enforcement.

After all, even societies like ours, societies whose citizens have been duly converted into passive addicts in order to manufacture compliance and consent on behalf of a ruling elite — must deal with outliers and the occasional rise of populist movements. What is the ruling elite to do with those who refuse or fail to comply?

What, American elites have asked us in recent years, are we to do with the tens of millions of Donald Trump voters, the populist MAGA movement, January 6th rioters, and angry parents who suddenly show up uninvited to school board meetings? What, ask blue-state governors, blue-city mayors, and the W.H.O. are we to do with anti-vax monsters who refuse to comply with covid lockdown, vaccine, and mask mandates? What, the Canadian oligarchs ask, are we to do with all these Nazi rogue truckers? What, ask the movers and shakers of civil society as they step off their private jets in Davos, are we to do with those who deny the science of climate change? What, ask the academicians and public school policy makers are we to do with those who deny gender-affirming care? What, ask the politicians, are we to do with those who deny election results? What, ask the global elite, are we to do with the anti-war Putin sympathizers who threaten the Liberal World Order, refuse to support the battle for democracy and freedom, and casually imperil so many Ukrainian lives?

What happens when the Huxleyan model of manufactured consent and compliance via state-sanctioned addiction fails to keep them all in check? To properly manage these and future populist miscreants, the ruling elite have borrowed from the 20th century’s other great literary dystopia: George Orwell’s 1984. In it, Orwell describes a society ruled and controlled not by state-sponsored default addiction, but by 24/7 surveillance, linguistic thought control, the wholesale manufacture of abject hatred, and jackboot-enforced fear — all state-sponsored and manufactured.

In Orwell’s classic dystopian vision, state-sanctioned violence is converted from something we fear into something we cheer. Each and every morning members of the Outer Party of Oceania are required by the elite Inner Party to participate in the daily Two Minutes Hate — 120 seconds of publicly expressed mob contempt and disgust for fabricated public enemy and terrorist, Emmanuel Goldstein…

In retrospect, the fictional execration of the Two Minutes Hate seems almost quaint when compared to the real thing today, an endless torrent of 1984-inspired venom and vitriol spewed on cable news and social media. More ominously, however, in the past few years the primary focus of our institutionally inspired animus has been turned inward, from foreign to domestic enemies of the state.

Nowadays, the new-and-improved Two Minutes Hate runs 24/7 nonstop, and the fabled Emmanuel Goldstein has been replaced by Donald Trump, his legions of deplorables, and the white-supremacist, transphobic, anti-vax MAGA insurrectionists of January 6th — the day that almost lived in infamy.

To keep today’s unwashed and under-educated working class in line, the ruling elite call upon the mostly white, mostly college educated, and mostly affluent institutional shock troops and street thugs of Wokeism, last deployed en masse in the summer of 2020 to burn down poor black neighborhoods in the name of anti-racism…

Everything about Wokeism is derivative of 1984, beginning with the perversely dangerous assertion that speech is violence: the epitome of 21st-century DoubleSpeak…

Further homage to Orwell is everywhere manifest in official Woke vernacular, informed and enhanced at any given moment by an ever-expanding style guide of pandering pronouns and euphemisms designed to confer quasi-scientific status and legitimacy on toxic social contagions like climate change, anti-racism, and critical gender theory — bastard stepchildren of a thoroughly corrupt and kleptocratic academia that sits like a tin crown atop an equally corrupt and kleptocratic public school system. In the end, it seems, social justice or climate justice or racial justice or trans justice or any other form of justice that requires a modifier is nothing more than good old-fashioned mob justice at digital scale.

With almost total control of institutional America — including academia and public education, the technomedia and corporate media giants, corporate finance, the Fortune 100, the DHS, the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, all major NGOs, global think tanks, and the entire surveillance-state apparatus — the Woke machine’s eagerness to jettison civil liberties and resort to political violence whenever it wants is testimony to complete and unmitigated institutional power in the near-total absence of accountability.

Institutionally, America is now a one-party town with the power and will to lavish DEFCON 1 levels of hatred and fear upon half the population of the country with casual disregard. We should be so lucky to confine their hate to only two minutes a day.

Unfortunately, all one-party towns breed intolerance and corruption. As a study in illiberal intolerance that would humble both Big Brother and Mustapha Mond in equal measure, the Wokeists are the ruling elite’s Praetorian Guard in a global class war against poor and middle class people of all colors worldwide. Against you, your family, and your community.

So there you have it: the compliance mechanism of state-sponsored default addiction borrowed from Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World on the one hand paired with the enforcement mechanism of 24/7 surveillance, linguistic thought control, and institutional terror borrowed from George Orwell’s 1984 on the other. Both at digital scale. They come together now as Huxwell — a global 21st-century adaptation of 20th-century totalitarianism.

Huxwell — equal doses of both dystopian visions, equal measures of drug-induced compliance and Stasi-style enforcement — with a little Mary Shelley tossed in for good measure…

Huxwell, however, ain’t your father’s totalitarianism. Three primary factors distinguish 21st-century Huxwellian totalitarianism from its 20th-century counterparts:

1. Digital scale
   Back in the 20th century, Western totalitarianism was confined to specific nations and cultures. Today, however, it engulfs entire continents like North America, Europe, and Australia. Driven by global institutions of immense digital scale and reach, the totalitarian hegemony of Huxwell follows in the imperial footsteps of Western consumer culture: powered over the past two generations by trillions of microchips and thousands of server farms. And unlike Nazi Germany, Huxwell cannot be crushed by external forces because the forces large enough to crush it are all in league with it.

2. Rise of the Bureaucrat
   Today’s Western totalitarians, at least those emerging now in Western democracies, are less akin to the larger-than-life fascists of the 20th century —like Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao — and more like your Uncle Joe and Aunt Jacinda. Today’s Western totalitarians are career politicians and unelected apparatchiks: dull, nondescript, and wholly unremarkable except in the power they wield and their unquestioning loyalty to the state. The Huxwellian totalitarians of today personify what Hanna Arendt described as the banality of evil.

3. The Great Age of Addiction
   Back in the 20th century addiction was still the exception to the rule. In the 21st-century rise of Huxwell, addiction is the rule.

Huxwell: the confluence of state-sponsored default addiction and the institutional tyranny of runaway digital scale. Huxwell: the go-to Chief Compliance Officer and Enforcer-in-Chief — all rolled up into one totalitarian mega-state. Huxwell: a monster designed to crush populist political resistance while the ruling elite ransack the joint. Huxwell, the Great Reset come to life...