|
comments,
ephemera, speculation, etc.
(protected political
speech and personal opinion)
- If this is your 1st visit to this page, please
start at the bottom -
2023-
2023-11-25
g
KILLING
COLLEGE
STUDENTS?
EDITOR'S NOTE:
I am less safe. My
immediate and extended family is less safe.
All Jews in America
are less safe because Mohammedans have been brought
here from West and
Central Asia as well as North Africa.
DAMN
ALL OF YOU WHO DELIBERATELY
BROUGHT THIS PLAGUE
TO THE NEW WORLD.
*
The
sudden surge in anti-Israel sentiment among
America’s youth is a phenomenon primarily made
possible by large-scale immigration. A quarter of
American children live in immigrant households.
And most foreign countries have radically
different attitudes toward the Jewish state.
https://t.co/7k6ebZyZYR
—
Stephen Miller (@StephenM) October
20, 2023
2023-11-25
f
KILLING BROWN PEOPLE
That’s not a breech,
it’s an inside job.
If
not, it means the IDF is the most incompetent
military that ever
walked the face of the earth.”
Obama Inc is Running Out
of Brown People to Kill
This is Israel's
American-planned-and-financed Color Revolution
I’ve kept my mouth
shut on Israel’s October 7th tragedy, trying to
angle out of arguments, until I realized that while
inflicted primarily upon Israel, it was also
designed to traumatize the whole world via the
initial massacre, then inevitably the raining of
hell on Israel and Gaza, making us in the rest of
the world fight each other, miring us in emotion.
Make us feel powerless, frustrated, angry, fearful.
Make us hand over agency.
That made it my
business. And yours.
I was raised with a
deep respect, almost a reverence for Jewish people
because my father had been put in charge of a
concentration camp – “a work camp, not a death
camp”, he would say – after the war. When I say
‘raised’, I mean I felt his feelings, his despair,
his trauma. Once in a very long while, he’d say, “I
saw things….” and then stop. I suspect this below is
what he saw and it turned him into something other.
Separate, alone with horror. His grief, his rage
over what happened turned me, a kid, into someone
aligned with the Jewish people, determined to defend
them. I suspect a lot of us felt that passion
growing up, that justice must be done, that this
must not happen again.
Another experience
I have that is relevant to this matter, is that my
mother was one of the first experimental subjects of
MKUltra at the Allan Memorial, under Allen Dulles’s
pet, psychiatrist Ewan Cameron. MKUltra’s subproject
68 designed and tested the elements of mind control.
They chose to experiment (without consent) on the
wrong mother suffering post-partum, and earned in
me, an implacable enemy.
The first principle
of mind control is trauma programming; repeated
horrifying shock turns people passive. That’s what
they did to the first subjects. They ramped up the
ECT, called Page-Russells but used more
intensively. They reduced patients to a pre-verbal
state, entirely dependent and pliable. Ready for
programming.
Psychological
warfare was launched on innocent citizens,
designed for mass mind control, reducing us all to
childlike dependence on a malignant government.
The past decades
have seen one collective trauma after another,
beginning with the JFK assassination. Repeated
assassinations, wars, endless threats, one hideous
recession after another, periodic political
earthquakes, all used as psychological warfare,
launched on innocent citizens, meant to reduce us to
dependence on a malignant government. October 8th’s
beheaded babies, old lady hostages, videotaped
rapes, children in cages were meant for every
single one of us. And while we’re at it, in the
same time period, the Lewiston, Maine shooter? He
had started hearing voices in his head according
to his family. They can do that now, training and
seducing in chat rooms, manipulating the weak and
crazy. They have the technology. I have no doubt,
zero, that most mass shooters are MKUltra. They
are mind controlled. They are trauma programming
meant to terrify. The specific purpose is to
disarm us.
What is the
endgame? Docile slaves handing over more and
more money with every paycheck. Never able to get
out of debt. Scared about the future. Biddable.
Fight this, they order. And we do. We need money to
fight. Give it over. And we do. Sacrifice the future
for safety. And we do.
October 7th was
designed, gamed, and triggered. It was meant to hide
their disastrous government. The neo-liberals in DC
have lost the Ukraine war, eviscerated the army’s
supplies, run up the debt another nine trillion.
More of the Bidens’ criminal activities are revealed
every day. There is a new sheriff in Congress, and
he looks very much like the Conservative candidate
for Prime Minister in Canada, calm, measured, fully
informed and loaded for bear. This is the face of
the new populism, considered, determined, smarter
than John Podesta, incorruptible. And young enough
to be around for twenty years.
Across the country,
election integrity people are winning, and if
defeated in court, they don’t give up. Each of them
risks jail from the corrupt Justice Department every
day. I’m not saying the Democrats won’t cheat, but
every ballot box will have a sentinel and a lawyer.
Mark Elias is going to be exhausted by the end of
it, stir-fried, ready for retirement.
The dam is breaking
over vaccine damage, and there are now hundreds of
lawyers taking clients in the U.S.. Canada admitted
this week that the shots were contaminated with DNA.
New Zealand’s government announced this week that
Jacinda Ardern’s government knew the shots were
dangerous and forced them anyway. Trump rises
in the polls with every regime attack. Parents have
never been more activated.
This is Obama’s
game. His people did it. This is how arrogant he is. He needs war to
win the next election. He needs war to escape the
devastation of his reputation, to save his
“legacy”. And he hates Israel. So he’s
launched a color revolution to take down Bibi, and
break Israel’s legerdemain in science, business
and near everything else. Swamp the country with
guilt and brutalize its people. Neo-liberals like
Obama have effectively destroyed Europe’s culture,
flooding it with desperate murderous barbarians
with zero education. This is what these people do,
they destroy everything good, feed on the fear,
and loot everything not nailed down. Obama is a
criminal. Biden is a criminal. The Bushes made
their money on Jewish slaves at Auschwitz and
financing the Nazis.Once you have done that, there
is no goodness in you. It’s all lies and
corruption and you can’t even see the good. You
serve Lucifer.
Obama is the
Manchurian Candidate, the most successful of many
confected creations designed to seduce the left or
right by the people with all the money. He bombed
more brown people that the Bush regime – which was a
lot - and he gave a trillion dollars to Wall
Street, while bankrupting Main Street and making
homelessness universal in every town and city. He
isn’t a leftist hero, he is a thief of peace and
prosperity.
Do you remember
Richard Perle? He was the Iraq warmonger
who was part of the neo-con contingent in the late
90’s. These jokers believed that only war would
focus American’s attention, bring out manly
virtues, pull people away from pleasure, turn them
to “God” and back to an authoritarian church.
There were books written about this stupid idea.
The left grabbed this notion, convinced they could
seduce and weaken the right with endless war.
When David Brooks
was still thinking clearly twenty years ago, he
pointed out that the only way to make money as a
political writer in DC was to cozy up to war
profiteers. Today, eighty-five percent of DC think tanks are funded by weapons
manufacturers.
I am going to walk
you through this theory, courtesy of Coffee and
Covid on Substack, Patrick Byrne on X.
Caroline Glick, who is the only writer I trust on
Israel and the Financial Times
confirm their analysis. All the links below.
Coffee and Covid:
“Following the summer battle over Israel’s leftist
Supreme Court, Biden (i.e. Obama), U.S. intelligence
agencies, and Israeli intelligence agencies
undermined Israel — to get rid of Benjamin
Netanyahu.”
Caroline Glick
continues the story “In other words, the riots, protests, acts
of political violence and intimidation that have
swamped Israel since January were not spontaneous
responses to the government’s legal reform
proposals.”
They were the
beginnings of a color revolution, paid for by
Americans.
Coffee and
Covid: “The gist of Patrick’s theory is that
former Obama officials Dan Shapiro (Obama’s
ambassador to Israel), Avril Haines (Obama deputy
assistant), Anthony Blinken (Obama deputy
assistant), and Michele Flournoy (Obama
undersecretary of defense) began representing an
Israeli cyber-security software developer called
Paragon. Paragon develops top-secret security tools
for Israeli’s defense industry.
“After the former
Obama officials got involved with Paragon, and
continuing through the Biden regime, the U.S. has
systematically targeted all of Paragon’s competitors
using a variety of federal procurement tools and
sanctions, forcing them either to close or sell off
their assets to Paragon or the U.S. One software
provider is deeply connected to Barack Obama and Joe
Biden. Paragon is also linked to former
Israeli Prime Minister and sworn Netanyahu enemy
Ehud Barak, who visited Epstein Island “on business”
over 30 times, which means that he is almost
certainly a blackmail pawn of the U.S. and Israeli
deep state’s intelligence agencies.
“At this point,
Israel depends on one single security software
provider, Paragon, a fact that the country’s
intelligence agencies have warned is a critical
security risk…. “
Caroline Glick:
“Channel 13’s
military correspondent Alon Ben David reported that
the Biden administration and the U.S. intelligence
agencies had decided to destroy Israel’s
cybersecurity industry and force Israel’s
cybersecurity firms to transfer their ownership,
operations—and allegiance—to the United States.
“Rather than defend
Israel’s industry, according to Ben David, the
government was ‘deliberately destroying’ the
industry to placate Washington. “The Defense
Ministry has already frozen most of the export
licenses and the Americans have simply decided to
shut down our offensive cyber industry and transfer
it to them,” Ben David explained.
“They (the
protests) were planned and financed weeks before
Justice Minister Yariv Levin was appointed to his
position and well before the government took any
position on anything.”
Just waiting for an
opening to take down Israel.
A former IDF
soldier who served on the Gaza border describes what
happened on the day. He can be watched here on X.
“On
September 1, the government confiscated the
weapons of the security teams in Gaza built
communities, against their will. On September 10,
the (de facto)
municipalities received reports of increased
tensions on the border during the holidays. Those
same heads asked the army if they should cancel
the festivities. The army said, “No, don’t cancel
anything, we are heading for calm.”
“Israel
is the most advanced surveillance state in the
world, and the border is the most heavily
surveilled in the world. During Covid, they could
track one person from the airport to a bathroom in
a soccer stadium.
“Command
center operators reported on the breach in fifteen
locations. This is documented. Once the thousands
invaded, they had seven hours to kill everyone in
their path, destroy and take hostages back to Gaza
unscathed and unopposed.
“An
attack helicopter takes five minutes to activate.
I served on Gaza border. It started at 7:01 on
October 8. It should have taken five minutes
before the whole thing was upended. Instead they
had eight hours to kill thousands and bring back
hostages alive. That’s not a breech,
it’s an inside job. If
not, it means the IDF is the most incompetent
military that ever walked the face of the
earth.”
He
concludes: “Do you really think we need America to
come help us fight Hamas? They don’t even have a
tank.”
The people in power
need our energy to effect their games. Without our
buy in, their power starts to fade. In fact, it is
fading now. This is a desperate play. As Steve
Bannon says, “this is the primal scream of a dying
regime.” They are making one mistake after another.
They are being caught in every jurisdiction, at
every level. When they and their endless stupid wars
are stopped, prosperity and growth and above all
civic peace, can return.
I want them on
trial, in public, until everyone sees the breadth
and depth of their betrayals. A generational duty. I
envy the people whose mission this will be. (read
more)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
See also:
https://carolineglick.com/ehud-baraks-complicated-position-in-israeli-politics-and-industry/
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/intelligence-failures-monday-october
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2023/11/activating-the-genocide-convention/
Israeli helicopter shot civilians at 7
October rave, police find
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-helicopter-shot-civilians-7-october-rave-police-find
Israeli lawmakers scream at family
members of captives
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/maureen-clare-murphy/israeli-lawmakers-scream-family-members-captives
The evidence Israel killed its own
citizens on 7 October
https://electronicintifada.net/content/evidence-israel-killed-its-own-citizens-7-october/41156
Israeli child “burned completely” by
Israeli tank fire at kibbutz
https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-child-burned-completely-israeli-tank-fire-kibbutz/41706
Israeli forces shot their own
civilians, kibbutz survivor says
“They eliminated
everyone, including the hostages.”
https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-forces-shot-their-own-civilians-kibbutz-survivor-says/38861
http://www.globalresearch.ca/israeli-rabbi-asks-settlers-to-poison-palestinian-water-in-order-to-kill-them/5532463
http://www.globalresearch.ca/netanyahu-government-reviving-the-greater-israel-scheme/5524057
https://www.jonathan-cook.net/2023-11-21/israel-goals-lies-1948-gaza/
https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/inept-zionists-slaughtered-own-people
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231122-ayelet-shaked-makes-provocative-statements-on-relocating-population-in-gaza/
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/10/biden-forced-to-call-off-his-plans-for-ethenic-cleansing-of-gaza.html#more
https://new.thecradle.co/articles/leaked-israeli-plan-to-ethnically-cleanse-gaza
https://thegrayzone.com/2023/10/27/israels-military-shelled-burning-tanks-helicopters/
*
Hamas is a Cold War creation and
was founded by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin (and funded by
Israel) in 1987, at the start of the First Intifada,
to oppose the secular, nationalist Fatah
organization, run by Yasser Arafat. The group is an
offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Hamas then opposed the peace efforts between Israel
and the Palestine Liberation Organization, and
opposed the Oslo Accords when rival Fatah renounced
violence and recognized the existence of Israel as
part of a two-state solution.
[...]
Qatar was the cutout, but will be hard to attack
Doha as the al-Thani have the receipts and, if
necessary, will disclose everything via
Al-Jazeera which is more credible in the region (and
much of the world) than any American or Israeli
spokesman sputtering, “It depends on what the
meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”It was good while it
lasted and, in 2019, Netanyahu put it out there:
“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a
Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas
and transferring money to Hamas,” Netanyahu
told his Likud party’s Knesset members in
March 2019. “This is part of our strategy.”
And don’t
just take BiBi’s word for it.
Israeli
historian Adam
Raz reports that Netanyahu’s policy from
2009 is “on the one hand, bolstering the rule of
Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and, on the other,
weakening the Palestinian Authority.” As a result,
he turned Hamas “from a terror organization with
few resources into a semi-state body.” To that
end, Netanyahu allowed cash deliveries by Qatari
envoys to Gaza (especially important after the
Palestinian Authority cut off Hamas from further
funding), leaked a top-secret military report on
the potential repercussions of conquering Gaza to
derail the diplomatic strategy of the previous
Israeli government, and “continuously thwarted all
the targeted assassinations [of Hamas leaders].”
Netanyahu’s
strategy was similar to Iran’s strategy as Tehran
pays over $100
million a year to Palestinian groups,
including Hamas, Palestine Islamic Jihad, and the
Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine-General Command, according to the U.S.
State Department.
And
the Hamas
charter is clear about its goals, so a
violent confrontation was inevitable, despite
Hamas’s double-dipping.
Israel
should have learned from America’s experience with
the Afghan mujaheddin where a useful,
well-funded vessel turned on its creator.
https://www.unz.com/article/hamas-israels-golem/
*
https://www.unz.com/article/hamas-winning-battle-for-gaza/
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/experts-agree-hamas-is-winning/
https://www.unz.com/runz/pro-israel-propaganda-lies-vs-reality/
https://www.unz.com/runz/war-crimes-and-atrocity-hoaxes-in-the-israel-gaza-conflict/
The EU brought to its knees by the
Straussians
https://www.voltairenet.org/article217976.html
The coup d’état of the Straussians in
Israel
https://www.voltairenet.org/article218957.html
https://x.com/VincentCrypt46/status/1716088629024461046?s=20
2023-11-25 e
KILLING THEIR
MORTAL ENEMY?
CONGRESSIONAL
JEW DECLARES THAT
TRUMP,
"HAS TO BE
ELIMINATED."
2023-11-25
d
KILLING THE EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION
MANY CULTURES ARE
INCOMPATIBLE WITH
EUROPEAN &
AMERICAN CULTURES.
The
Khazar Bolsheviks are sending Mohammedans by the
millions to
Europe & America
to destabilize, then destroy Western Civilization.
No, We’re NOT All The
Same
There's a little
chestnut -- a fraud -- that nobody wishes to talk
about that comes down to two words: Magic
Dirt.
It is the premise
that one can take the thug out of the hood and he will become
not a thug.
It underlies most of the wildly-false
beliefs that many run on immigration, for
example. Exceptions do not prove the rule; they
are, in fact, exceptions.
Immigration
from Western Europe mostly
worked for America because
Western Europeans and Americans share common
values in large part. That's largely
because we
were them before they came here, and while there are
variation the basics are about the same
when it comes to culture. I'm talking
about very basic things, such as, for example,
the value of human life.
This
didn't happen magically; it happened because that
part of the world required it thousands of years ago
or
everyone would die. There's this thing
called "winter" and if you didn't cooperate with
others to some degree and prepare for it you would
not live through it. The mortality rate of
someone attempting "no contact, no community"
living was extremely high and only a
reasonable modicum of cooperation helped.
Thus
it was over the space of thousands of years.
In sub-Saharan
Africa -- not so much. Ditto in many other
parts of the world. But this was not just
about the environment; it was also about inculcation
and it is true in most of the rest of the
world by population. Those who have never
dealt with non-Western folks to any degree beyond
perhaps a vacation overseas have no idea at
all how these differences bear on how different
groups of people think at very
basic levels -- such as, for
example once again, the value of human
life.
Taking
someone from one of those other parts of the world
and transporting them here to America, or to
Europe, does not change those core
beliefs, values and inculcated behavior
patterns. There is no "magic
dirt" that will do that and in fact,
unless someone is a very young child, it may not
even be possible to change that part of
someone's psyche.
If you talk with
people who have dealt with the horrors of war in
Iraq or Afghanistan, for example, they'll tell you
this. The people there don't see killing you
as a necessary part of a war effort -- they actually enjoy
it and celebrate your death if they can pull it
off. The same is true in many other parts of the
world. Rwanda is a great example; they had a
civil war and over a half-million civilians were
slaughtered, and roughly as many women were raped,
in a mere 100 days starting in April of 1994 with most of the killing
conducted literally by hand with
machetes. It was an unspeakable and
unbelievable level of brutality beyond anything you
can, as a Western person, imagine -- and on a
per-unit-of-time basis arguably one of the worst, if
not the worst, mass-slaughter man has witnessed.
They
thought nothing of it at all; the assassination of
one of their leaders set it off but it had been
planned in advance -- you don't exactly distribute
huge numbers of machetes, way beyond what you need
to tend crops, without thinking about their
intended use in severing heads.
Mexican and other
Central and South American gang members are of
similar mindsets. They have no respect for
life whatsoever and
never will. Believing you
can change this will simply get you killed and they will
think nothing of it. There is a decent
argument that much of this is inherently in many
of the people's blood from that part of the
world and dates all the way back to before
Cortez. You're not going to change that in
months or even years; it
in fact hasn't changed in the 500 years since
Cortez came to the Americas!
There is much
debate about "nature .v. nurture" in human development
but we know much less on the truths of that
topic than we think we do. The current
Speaker of the House took in a black youth yet
despite giving him a "good" upbringing he reverted
back to criminal activity and association from
others within his past and he was taken
in before he had personally turned to crime as an
adolescent. His exposure to
positive influence and nurture didn't change that.
People can
certainly change but they have to want to and
further that which is within you and is contrary to
that desire has to be overcome. This doesn't mean
some cannot find success in such an endeavor but if you're going
to claim that you cannot treat all based on some
percentage of the individuals then
that has to apply the other way around too in
that the presumption must not be that all are
good when we know that
across various parts of the world shared values and
beliefs at a core level for many are absolutely
incompatible with Western European and American
society.
Look at what
Germany is facing now. They asked for
this; they
admitted into their nation huge numbers of people
who did not share German values and
in fact they always did and still do seek to
overthrow the existing Constitutional government
-- and if they can make enough offspring who they
will inculcate with THEIR set of values
they will do exactly that.
They have made
clear they will not stop in their endeavor so other
than by killing them or throwing them out what other options
beyond surrender do you have? You can choose to not
take their threats seriously but that would be
rather stupid, wouldn't it?
It would have been
better to
not let them in originally, don't you think?
Israel has
established itself as a Jewish state. They have
no intention of allowing enough Muslims to be
citizens who could, by "democratic
process", remove the "Jewish State" status from
their government and impose a Sharia-based
government in its place.
Do you fault them
for this position?
Are
you willing to let something like that happen
here in America? I would hope not but if you think
that America is endowed with some form of magic
that will prevent it you're wrong. Only by refusing to
permit such a concentration to exist, and yes, that
means exactly what you think it does, can such be
prevented if there are those who you are willing
to admit into the country that hold this set of
beliefs.
Core beliefs --
culture, if you will -- matters.
All humans
are not the same, and no,
taking a human from one place to another does not change who they
are. If you do not insist that only those willing
to assimilate into the
existing culture, not change
it to be what theirs is, are the only people you admit for
residency and ultimately citizenship including any woman
who can potentially bear and raise such a
child, you are at risk of exactly what has been
done all over the world throughout history and is
being attempted right now in both Germany and
Israel.
It can
happen here and if it does everything you
think of as America when it comes to
our Constitution and Civil Rights
is GONE.
Further, if
you think this isn't at the core of the
Israeli/Palestinian issue you're dead wrong.
That is
first, foremost and all
it is actually about and unless you
want that sort of problem here
you better recognize it and put a stop to admitting
those into our nation who will not in fact
become American, but wish to change America to
suit their cultural desires and
demands, and make clear that any who are
currently here for other than tourism purposes
yet refuse to become American and adopt our
values must leave -- and mean it.
Merely
being present here will not change a thing and if
birthright citizenship is permitted then
the only way to prevent this destruction is
to absolutely
bar from entry and immediately deport if already
present those who have or
display any indication of such
an intent along with placing into law sufficient
guards to prevent deception in this regard.
You may not
like this and find it repugnant, but that you
don't like it doesn't make it untrue.
It is true. (read
more)
*
IGNORANT MORONS WHO
"DON'T KNOW NUTHIN' ABOUT HISTORY"
ARE ANOTHER THREAT
TO THE SURVIVAL OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
2023-11-25
c
KILLING THE AMERICAN GOOSE THAT LAID THE GOLDEN EGG OF
PROSPERITY, LIBERTY & FREEDOM
THE BOLSHEVIKS MUST BE
STOPPED IN 2024
Understand
what time it is in America:
•
Trump is being prosecuted by Biden’s regime +
multiple state level Democrats
•
Every agency in government has been weaponized to
investigate @elonmusk because he’s trying to level
the playing field online to empower citizens
•
Newsweek just broke the story that the FBI is both
investigating Trump voters and treating them like
terrorists by using the same types of tools they
used against ISIS
•
DHS and CISA used proxies to censor influencers
like me and @charliekirk11 for opposing Democrats
too effectively
•
Grandma’s (including one with cancer) who thought
they were allowed in the Capitol after police
waved them in were thrown in prison over January
6th despite zero violence
•
Soros DA’s are releasing pedophiles and criminals
to carry out record crime
•
Over 7 MILLION illegal immigrants have entered our
country under Biden — Only 14 states have
populations > 7.4M
•
Schools are grooming kids about so called social
justice, gender identity and sexual topics
(including books with porn in them) while hiding
all of it from parents
•
People fear saying they vote Republican despite
Republicans winning the 2022 popular vote because
they know they can lose their jobs over it or be
ostracized
•
Doctors are giving kids sex changes with the full
support of the White House including on children
of our troops
•
Doctors lose their licenses over disagreeing with
the narrative of the Democrats
•
Banks, Big Tech and online transaction services
have banned prominent influencers for the crime of
being conservative
•
Inflation and interest rates are destroying our
economy in ways that we’ll be dealing with for
over a decade
•
80-90% of Congress represent their own interests
and lobbyists instead of people
•
Big Tech companies manipulate what the public sees
to sell the Democrats narrative
•
Soldiers were fired by the thousands for being
conservatives who didn’t want the COVID jab — They
even denied chaplains religious exemptions
•
People are put through public struggle sessions if
they say men can’t be women
•
The DOJ and Democrat DA’s are deploying lawfare to
bankrupt prominent Trump officials and supporters
— “the process is the punishment”
•
College kids won’t get into schools if they
express any conservative views and many will be
failed in classes if professors find out they’re
conservative
•
Parents were treated like terrorists by Merrick
Garland and the DOJ for protesting school boards
over COVID and the sexualization of children
•
Professional programs to become doctors and nurses
are adding steps to screen for ideology to
eliminate conservatives: Many do it in sneaky ways
(doctors do this with requirements to get the
COVID vax in order to get a residency)
•
Some states passed laws to take custody from
parents who don’t affirm the new gender identity
of their kids and even legalized kids running away
to their state to get an abortion or sex change
•
BLM and Antifa members received multi million
dollar settlements after burning down cities with
riots and looting for a year because they’re
modern day brown shirts that the Democrats had to
reward to ensure they do it again in the future
Our
future is closer to Russia under Stalin, Cuba
under Castro, China under Mao or Venezuela under
Maduro than we are to the ideals of our
constitution. We’re living through the intentional
destruction of the country we know and love. Why?
Because communism never becomes reality without
chaos, destruction and separating kids from their
parents.
America
won’t survive unless Republican politicians get
serious and recognize how far down the road to
hell we are. It’s not time for Fox News hits where
you get the one liner off that you hope to
fundraise off of. It’s not time for another
hearing that goes nowhere. It’s time to use EVERY
lever of power you have to crush these new age
communists and yes I mean communists.
It’s
time to be ruthless.
Understand what time it is in America:
•
Trump is being prosecuted by Biden’s regime +
multiple state level Democrats
•
Every agency in government has been weaponized to
investigate @elonmusk because he’s trying to level
the playing field online to empower citizens
•…
—
Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) October
6, 2023
2023-11-25 b
KILLING
BUSINESS-AS-USUAL
IN ARGENTINA
MAKE ARGENTINA GREAT
AGAIN
*
Argentina’s
new President:
•
Anti-Woke
•
Anti-globalist
•
Anti-abortion
•
Anti-climate change
•
Anti-Central Banking System
•
Anti-socialism
•
Pro-gun
•
Pro-family
•
Pro-education
•
Pro-US Dollar
pic.twitter.com/nu3MNL7Tc3
—
Oli London (@OliLondonTV) November
20, 2023
*
*
*
See also:
2023-11-25
a
KILLING
NET-ZERO &
ESG
"Now ESG is failing. Market
leaders say it is facing "a perfect storm of
negative sentiment" and its U.S. investments
fell by $163 billion in the first
quarter of 2023 alone. Its stepchild,
Net-Zero, is so loathed, it looks like it
might blow up the entire carbon scam."
Deplorables killed Net-Zero and ESG. I Know!
Let's Steal the National Parks!
A New Threat Rises
from the Criminal Cartel that Farms Us for
Profit.
Delayed but not stopped, the U.S. government
is planning a rule that allows for America’s protected
lands, including parks and wildlife refuges, to be
listed on the N.Y. Stock Exchange. Natural Asset Companies (NACs)
will be owned, managed, and traded by companies like
BlackRock, Vanguard, and even China.
The deadline was Friday, but earlier this
week, the deadline was postponed until January. This
is the usual criminal feint from the environmental
movement and the administrative state. People are
complaining? Let’s put it off till they go back to
sleep. Then we will steal their birthright late at
night, in precisely the manner we have stolen
everything else.
Since the early 2000’s, outfits like Goldman
Sachs have been trying to trade air, or specifically
carbon without much success. Their 2005 carbon exchange
staggered along until it was quietly discontinued,
and their Climate Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) is now
facing delisting. "ESG" was the
next attempt to monetize the un-monetizable, with
the "E" part of that acronym standing for
Environment, ill-defined as that was. Now ESG is failing. Market leaders
say it is facing "a perfect storm of negative
sentiment" and its U.S. investments fell by $163
billion in the first quarter of 2023 alone.
Its stepchild, Net-Zero, is so loathed, it
looks like it might blow up the entire carbon scam.
Says Australian senator Matt Canavan, "Net-Zero has
absolutely carked it. It is a soundbite and totally
insane. Almost everything we grow, we make, we do in
our society relies on the use of fossil
fuels." Vanguard has pulled out
of Net-Zero funds. The British government too is
backing out of Net-Zero, saying "we won't save the
planet by bankrupting the British people." New
Zealand’s new government revised the country's
Net-Zero plans in its first week in office. In the
hard hit Netherlands, the Farmer-Citizen movement is
now the dominant party in the Dutch senate and every
provincial assembly. Sweden has abandoned its
100 percent Net-Zero plans and Norway has announced
another $18 billion in oil and gas investments.
Even in the submissive E.U. voters are turning
from the "green" parties toward anti-E.U. parties.
Renewables funds are seeing massive outflows because of
rising interest rates and declining subsidies. Of
course, the massive subsidies taxpayers have already
given both "renewables" investors and "renewables"
companies will never be clawed back. All we will get
is a shrug as they move onto the next kill. Which is
so obvious it is a wonder no one predicted it.
The entire universe envies the lush interior
of the U.S. Increasingly empty, it is filled with a
cornucopia of minerals, fiber, food, waters,
extraordinarily fertile soil as well as well-ordered,
educated, mostly docile people. Worth in the
quadrillions, if one could monetize and trade it,
financialize it, the way the market has financialized
the future labor of Americans, well, it would be like
golden coins raining from the sky.
On October 4th, the Securities and Exchange
Commission filed a proposed rule to create Natural
Asset Companies (NACs). A
twenty-one day comment period was allowed, which is
half the minimum number of days generally required
and when they postponed passing the rule, they did
not extend the comment period. “Nope, shut up,” they
said.
NACs will allow BlackRock, Bill Gates, and
possibly even China to hold the ecosystem rights to
the land, water, air, and natural processes of the
properties enrolled in NACs. Each NAC will hold
“management authority” over the land. When we are
issued carbon allowances, owners of said lands will be
able to claim tax deductions and will be able to sell
carbon allowances to businesses, families and
townships. In the simplest of terms, that's where the
money will be made. WE peons will be renting air from
the richest people on earth.
The following are eligible for NACs: National
Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, Wilderness Areas,
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, Conservation
Areas on Private and Federal Lands, Endangered Species
Critical Habitat, and the Conservation Reserve
Program. Lest you think that any conserved land is
conserved in your name, the largest Conservation
organization in the U.S., is called The Nature
Conservancy, or TNC, which, while being a 501(c)3,
also holds six billion dollars of land on its books.
Those lands have been taken using your money via
donations and government grants, and transferred to
the Nature Conservancy, which can do with those lands
what it wills.
If this rule passes, America's conserved lands
and parks will move onto the balance sheets of the
richest people in the world. Management of those lands
will be decided by them and their operations, to say
the least, will be opaque.
μολὼν λαβέ, buddy.
Farm country is fighting back. American
Stewards of Liberty, Committee for a Constructive
Tomorrow, Kansas Natural Resource Coalition, Financial
Fairness Alliance and Blue Ribbon Coalition have filed
comments, Republican senators Pete Ricketts, James
Risch and Mike Crapo have sent pointed queries to the
SEC. This week, Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY) offered an
amendment that would defund the SEC proposed rule to
approve listing "NACs."
Most of us ill-understand "financialization."
It is a complex set of maneuvers best explained by the
behavior that crashed the economy in 2008 which
bundled up questionable mortgages and brokered off the
risk to dozens of different funds in order to share
that risk. NACs are asset grabs. From '09-'20, funds
asset-stripped America's manufacturing via debt
obligations, buying the company, selling off the
equipment, firing the most expensive employees, and
gutting, if they could, pension funds. Then they upped
the price and sold on the assets. Which were bundled
and brokered off. These are called collateralized debt
obligations and they thunder doom underneath the
debt-fueled economy.
Natural Asset Companies are an attempt to grab
hard assets to make up for an inevitable collapse. But
taking more land out of production makes it certain
that collapse moves ever closer. Land needs to be
used, cared for, and maintained by the people who live
on and use the land. Otherwise, it runs to desert and
invasive species. The mad push to "green" and net-zero
has triggered financialization, or a brokering of the
future, because only energy spurs real growth -- and
energy has been increasingly restricted over the past
twenty years. NACs are another destroyer of America's
heartland.
2023-11-24 e
SLOUCHES TOWARDS
HYPERINFLATION
LAUREN BOEBERT ASKS A
QUESTION.
Affirmative action
Negress hasn't a good answer.
This Is Crazy. The
Director of the United States Office of Management
and Budget, Shalanda Young, Doesn’t Know What
Causes Inflation. How Do These People Get Their
Jobs?
Young “Sure the
cost of goods are more expensive. It costs more
for the same goods than it did last year. The
president is very aware of that. That is why it
called on Congress to send him legislation that
reduced the cost of health care.”
Rep Lauren Boebert
(@laurenboebert)
“That's not exactly where I was getting at. Let me
answer this for you. So Milton Freeman, who won
the Nobel Prize in economics, said that inflation
comes from too much money being printed in DC.
Specifically, and I quote, he said, is a result of
too much money and more rapid increase in the
quantity of money than in output. Moreover, in the
modern Era, the important next step to recognize
that today, governments control the quantity of
money so that as a result, inflation in the United
States is made in Washington and nowhere else. So
Director Young, in short, inflation comes from
Washington, DC, where the products we use aren't
created, but the products we use are made more
expensive.
Director Young,
shamefully, this Biden budget proposes the largest
tax increase in American history. And I really
think that that bears repeating. It is the largest
in American history. The Biden regime either has
no concept of how inflation is impacting Americans
or simply has no concept for Americans who find
the cost of gasoline too expensive because after
all they can't just go buy a Tesla. How about that
for Democrat priorities? Thank you, Madam
Director.”
This Is Crazy. The
Director of the United States Office of Management
and Budget, Shalanda Young, Doesn’t Know What
Causes Inflation. How Do These People Get Their
Jobs?
Young “Sure the
cost of goods are more expensive. It costs more
for the same goods than it did last year. The… pic.twitter.com/O4U25BNcfs
— Wall Street Apes
(@WallStreetApes) November
19, 2023
2023-11-24
d
SLOUCHES
TOWARDS
HYPOCRISY
“Nimrata Randhawa wants me to use my real
name.”
So, why does she
persist in calling herself Nikki?
Who is Nimrata
trying to fool?
*
See also: https://thefederalist.com/2023/10/03/nikki-rodham-haley-the-hillary-clinton-of-the-gop/
2023-11-24 c
SLOUCHES
TOWARDS
SEXUALIZATION
OF YOUTH
Protocol №14,
paragraph 5:
IN
COUNTRIES
KNOWN AS
PROGRESSIVE
AND
ENLIGHTENED WE
HAVE CREATED A
SENSELESS,
FILTHY,
ABOMINABLE
LITERATURE.
2023-11-24
b
SLOUCHES
TOWARDS CLEAN
ELECTIONS
"If you cannot cross search property
rolls,
you cannot clean voter
rolls. Period."
However, this is
merely an interim solution.
We
must ultimately have poll books on paper - a
physical, not a digital record.
(This requires
smaller precincts.)
Digitized records
are records that can be altered or tampered by
anyone, anywhere.
Also, America should
return to paper ballots counted at each precinct
& one day voting
with early or
off-premise voting only for overseas military or
hospitalized voters.
This week the Fractal team started our 24th
state comparison of property tax rolls with the voter
rolls – the results are astounding!
If you cannot cross
search property rolls, you cannot clean voter rolls.
Period.
We are finding
streets, in one state, cities, that literally do not
exist – but are on voter rolls, with thousands of FAKE
voters.
24 state teams,
working with their legislators, building a real time
view of their voter rolls cross searched against
property rolls and FEC and other government rolls!
We created a video of
several Georgia counties we are posting soon. You will
see Fractal at work at Georgia counties – showing
extraordinary detail on anomalies in that state’s
voter rolls.
We show videos from
every current state showing the power of cross search
with property tax records as the teams make them
available. In addition to property tax records, we
added several national government databases.
Previously we were
accepting data for only one or two counties in each
state for the cross compares. We are now taking ALL
counties – in every state!
Recent funding and
some incredible Fractal innovation enable us to ingest
the property tax records for all 3,200 U.S. counties.
Contact us and we
will bring your county into the mix.
We have documents
created by the FracPack
(current state users) showing how to gather the
appropriate data. County assessors are working with us
across the country to build the database.
In two cases, they
asked if we could replace their current obsolete SQL
system!
Send us an email via
Omega4America.com and we will send out the dox to get
you started.
We now have one Unites
States Senator, two state legislatures and a huge
Republican think tank going with Fractal.
Let’s get all the data
– for every state – every U.S. county and build the
world’s largest address database – cross searched with
A.I. technology at 200 million transactions per
second.
This will be a
national resource to clean voter rolls, all government
rolls and finally give citizens transparency to their
official, public records.
Regards,
Jay
Omega4America.com
*
RELATED:
THIS, FOR EXAMPLE, IS
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN GEORGIA:
2023-11-24
a
SLOUCHES TOWARDS J6 JUSTICE
THANKSGIVING IN THE
AWAKENING AMERICA
THANKSGIVING
IN THE FORMER AMERICA
2023-11-23
b
SLOUCHES TOWARDS
SOCIALISM
The lesson is — The
True Story of Thanksgiving is — that William
Bradford and his Pilgrim community were thanking
God for the blessings on their community after
the first miserable winter of a documented
failure brought on by their attempt at fairness
and equality, which was socialism.
‘Long Before Karl Marx’ the Pilgrims
Experimented with Socialism: Rush Limbaugh’s True
Story of Thanksgiving Revisited
Rush Limbaugh
left us nearly three years ago after succumbing to
a bout with cancer.
The absence of
his voice from the airwaves is sorely missed,
especially in the precarious era of Biden.
Throughout his
more than three decades as a fixture for
conservatives on the radio, Limbaugh maintained an
annual tradition of retelling the “true” story of
Thanksgiving during his last broadcast before the
Thanksgiving holiday.
Limbaugh’s
version of events first appeared in his book, “See, I Told You So,” and proclaimed the
origins of Thanksgiving had been mischaracterized
over the years.
During his 2020
Thanksgiving Eve show, Limbaugh explained the real
success story of the Pilgrims stems from their
rejection of a socialist form of governance.
Transcript as
follows (courtesy of RushLimbaugh.com):
LIMBAUGH: So my
second book was “See, I Told You So.” The first
book is “The Way Things Ought to Be” and the
second book is “See, I Told You So.” “Chapter 6,
Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never
Told You: The True Story of Thanksgiving.”
Now, normally
what I do is simply read from my first book. But
there has now been another book added in the
Rush Revere series, and the first Rush Revere
book is Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims.
These are children books that were written to
help young people get the true stories of
America’s founding because so little of it is
actually correctly taught.
In the
children’s book version, Rush Revere and the
Brave Pilgrims, I went into a little bit more
detail about the Indians, the Native Americans
who helped the arriving Pilgrims and what that
story actually is and how the True Story of
Thanksgiving has been obscured by what is taught
— what I was taught, you were probably taught.
Here’s the version you were probably taught:
The Pilgrims
arrived here after an arduous trip across the
Atlantic Ocean. They didn’t know why they were,
had no idea what to do. They had nothing. The
Indians took pity on them. The Indians saw them,
and the Indians saved them. The Indians taught
’em how to do things they didn’t know how to do,
like grow food, catch beavers, stuff like that.
The Indians
saved them, and the Pilgrims thanked them by
growing a whole bunch of food and having this
big feast. So the story of Thanksgiving that’s
taught is basically how without the Native
Americans there wouldn’t be a country because
the Pilgrims would have died. At least the
Pilgrims were nice enough to pay the Indians
back with a big Thanksgiving dinner.
That’s not at
all what happened. It’s not even close to what
happened, which is why I decided to write about
it. Now, in the Revere book — the children’s
book, as I say — I went into greater detail
about some of the Native Americans who provided
assistance to the arriving Pilgrims,
particularly a young native by the name of
Squanto.
Now, I’m doing
show prep today, and I come across a story in
the Federalist. I quote from this website all
the time, and I’m reading this story here, and
by the way, folks, it is… (chuckles) I don’t
know. It’s right out of the Rush Revere book,
and it’s right out of my See, I Told You So
book. There’s a whole lot of discussion here of
Squanto, who he was, what he did, how he helped,
the details.
The point is
The True Story of Thanksgiving is spreading, and
I couldn’t be happier about that. Bottom line:
It is spreading. I’m just gonna cut to the chase
here before getting into reading the text. The
Real Story of Thanksgiving, going back to the
very first early days of the Pilgrims arriving
at Plymouth Rock, is that socialism failed.
This is
crucially important today, because we have just
elected a Democrat Party that is going to
implement socialism if they win these two seats
in Georgia, and they’re gonna try regardless.
But if they win those two seats in Georgia, you
can say good-bye to the United States as you
know it. It will become a socialist state. It
will begin the process of becoming…
Well, we’re way
down the road towards it anyway. So it is
crucially important here for people to
understand this. It’s not antiquated. It’s not a
cliche. It’s not something that you can make fun
of people about. You know, it used to be when I
first started this show in the late eighties,
early nineties, if you dared to refer to the
Soviet Union as “communist,” people made fun of
you.
“Ah, come on,
Rush! You see a communist behind every rock,”
and they tried to ridicule you out of
identifying communists and communism. Castro,
the ChiComs. I never buckled, but a lot of
people did — and they’re doing it now. If you
say, “The United States, the Democrat Party’s on
the pathway to socialism,” they make fun of you.
They mock you.
“Come on! You
don’t believe that. You can’t believe that!
That’s just silly,” and they try to mock you and
make fun of you, to silence you. But, folks,
it’s real. Now… “The story of the Pilgrims
begins in the early part of the seventeenth
century… The Church of England under King James
I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did
not recognize [the church’s] absolute civil and
spiritual authority,” actually, the state.
“Those who
challenged ecclesiastical authority and those
who believed strongly in freedom of worship were
hunted down…” This is in England in the 1600s.
They “were hunted down and imprisoned, and
sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of
separatists,” people who didn’t want any part of
this, “first fled to Holland,” they liked wooden
shoes and cheese, “and established a community.”
They were there
for eleven years. “After eleven years, about
forty of” these separatists who liked wooden
shoes and cheese, “agreed to make a perilous
journey to the New World…” They had heard about
it. Some new, exciting place that hadn’t been
developed. They knew they would “face
hardships,” hardships like you and I don’t know
— and I’m not preaching to you.
I’m just
telling you, we don’t know the hardship these
people endured. We can’t. We are way too
advanced now. People who lived in the 1600s
would not believe life today. (Snort!) Try to
explain flight, jet travel. They wouldn’t
understand it. They knew they would “face
hardships,” but paramount importance to them was
living freely and worshiping God according to
the dictates of their own consciences, their own
beliefs.
That’s what
they were denied the freedom to do in England.
“On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It
carried a total of 102 passengers, including
forty” of these separatists, the Pilgrims. There
were just 40 of them. They were “led by William
Bradford. On the journey” across the Atlantic…
You talk about something that had to be
frightening and scary?
The Mayflower
was not much bigger than a 50-foot boat, and 102
people on it. “On the journey, Bradford set up
an agreement, a contract” if you will, “that
established just and equal laws for all [40]
members of the [Pilgrim] community, irrespective
of their religious beliefs.” It didn’t matter
what their religious beliefs were.
These are the
laws they were all agreeing to live by. “Where
did the revolutionary ideas,” these laws, come
from? We’re talking about the Mayflower Compact.
That is what Bradford wrote. The Mayflower
Compact derived “[f]rom the Bible. The Pilgrims
were a people completely steeped in the lessons
of the Old and New Testaments.”
They were
devoutly religious people. No matter what else
is said about them (and even that is denied),
they were devoutly religious. “They looked to
the ancient Israelites for their example. And,
because of the biblical precedents set forth in
Scripture, they never doubted that their
experiment would work.”
They never
doubted they would get to the New World. They
never doubted that once they got there, they
would thrive. The journey was long; it was
arduous; it was dangerous. And when they finally
landed, when the Pilgrims finally landed in New
England in November, according to William
Bradford’s detailed journal, they found a cold,
barren, desolate wilderness. Imagine New England
as it exists today as nothing but rocks, forest,
undeveloped nature in November and getting
colder.
There were no
friends to greet them. There was no shelter of
any kind other than hiding under a tree, there
was nothing, folks. It was desolate. There were
no hotels. There were no inns. There were no
places to clean up. There were no houses. I
mean, this was real hardship. The sacrifice that
they had made for the freedom to worship was
just beginning.
During that
first winter — remember, they arrive in November
— during that first winter, half of them,
including William Bradford’s own wife, died of
starvation, of sickness, exposure to the
elements. Now we’re getting close to what you
were taught in school. When spring finally came
— and, by the way, writing that doesn’t do it
justice. Spring didn’t just finally come. It was
a survival. It was an act of survival that you
and I cannot possibly relate to or understand.
American
Special Forces can. Military people who’ve been
trained can understand what the Pilgrims were —
you and I can’t. We’ve never done anything like
that first winter in the New World. They
survived it. Spring finally came. They did meet
the Indians, the Native Americans who were
there, who did help them in planting corn and
fishing for cod. They showed ’em where the
beavers were so the beavers could be skinned for
coats, other things. You animal rights people
are not gonna like some of this story, but it
happened.
But even at
this, even with this degree of assistance from
the Indian, the Native Americans, there wasn’t
any prosperity yet. They had the Mayflower
Compact. They had these laws they were living
by, and there was no prosperity. And I wonder
why. Now, this is important to understand here,
folks, because this is where modern American
history lessons end, with the Indians teaching
the Pilgrims how to eat, how to fish, how to
skin beavers, and all that.
That’s where it
ends. And that’s the feel-good story. But that
doesn’t even get close to the true story. You
know, Thanksgiving is actually explained in some
textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims
gave thanks to the Indians for saving their
lives. It wasn’t that. That happened, but
Thanksgiving was a devout expression of
gratitude, the Pilgrims, to God for their
survival, and everything that was a part of it.
Now, here’s the
part that has been omitted. The original
contract the Pilgrims entered into in Holland —
they had sponsors. They didn’t have the money to
do this trip on their own. They had sponsors.
There were merchant sponsors in London and in
Holland. And these merchant sponsors demanded
that everything that the Pilgrims produced in
the New World would go into a common store, a
single bank, if you will. And that each member
of the Pilgrim community was entitled to one
share.
So everybody
had an equal share of whatever was in that bank.
All of the land they cleared, all of the houses
they built belonged to that bank, to the
community as well. And they were going to
distribute it equally, because they were gonna
be fair. So all of the land that they cleared
and all the houses they built belonged to
everybody. Belonged to the community. Belonged
to the bank, belonged to the common store.
Nobody owned anything. They just had an equal
share in it. It was a commune.
The Pilgrims
established a commune, essentially. Forerunner
of the communes we saw in the sixties and
seventies out in California. They even had their
own organic vegetables, by the way. Yep. The
Pilgrims, forerunners of organic vegetables. Of
course, what else could there be? No such thing
as processed anything back then.
Now, William
Bradford, who had become the governor of the
colony ’cause he was the leader, recognized that
this wasn’t gonna work. This was costly and
destructive, and it just wasn’t working. It was
collectivism. It was socialism. It wasn’t
working. That first winner had taken a lot of
lives. The manpower was greatly reduced. So
William Bradford decided to take bold action,
which I will describe when we get back.
(BREAK
TRANSCRIPT)
LIMBAUGH:
William Bradford, the governor of the Pilgrim
community, saw that none of this was working.
The Mayflower Compact was not working. Giving
everybody a single share of stock in the common
store, in the common bank was not working.
Collectivism. It was as costly and destructive
to the Pilgrims as it is and has been to anybody
who has ever tried it.
So Bradford
decided to scrub it. He threw it out and took
bold action. He assigned a plot of land to each
family. Every family was given a plot of land.
They could work it, manage it however they
wanted to. If they just wanted to sit on it, get
fat, dumb, happy, and lazy, they could. If they
wanted to develop it, if they wanted to grow
corn, whatever on it, they could. If they wanted
to build on it, they could do that. If they
wanted to turn it into a quasi-business, they
could do whatever they wanted to do with it.
He turned loose
the power of the capitalist marketplace. Long
before Karl Marx was even born. Long before Karl
Marx was a sperm cell in his father’s dreams,
the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented
with what could only be described as socialism,
and they found that it didn’t work. Now, it
wasn’t called that then. But that’s exactly what
it was. Everybody was given an equal share. You
know what happened? Nobody did anything. There
was no incentive. Nothing worked. Nothing
happened.
“What Bradford
and his community found was that the most
creative and industrious people had no incentive
to work any harder than anyone else, unless they
could utilize the power of personal motivation!
But while most of the rest of the world has been
experimenting with socialism for well over a
hundred years – trying to refine it, perfect it,
and re-invent it – the Pilgrims decided early on
to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote
about this social experiment should be in every
schoolchild’s history lesson. If it were, we
might prevent much needless suffering,” if the
true story of Thanksgiving had been taught for
years and years and years.
(BREAK
TRANSCRIPT)
LIMBAUGH: So
William Bradford, after putting everybody in a
common store, the Mayflower Compact… They wanted
to be fair. They wanted everybody to have one
common share of stock in everything that
happened that the Pilgrims produced — and it
bombed. It didn’t work.
There was no
prosperity; there was no creativity because
there was no incentive. Here’s what Bradford
wrote about the failure: “‘For this community
[so far as it was] was found to breed much
confusion and discontent…’” They were not happy,
on other words. “‘[T]his community was found to
breed much confusion and discontent and retard
much employment that would have been to their
benefit and comfort.’”
In other words,
nobody worked.
The way they
set it up, killed and discouraged work.
There was no
need.
“‘For young men
that were most able and fit for labor and
service’” sat around and did nothing. “‘[T]hey
should spend their time and strength to work for
other men’s wives and children without’” being
paid for it? Why should they do that? So they
didn’t. “‘[T]hat was thought injustice.’ Why
should you work for other people when you can’t
work for yourself? What’s the point? Do you hear
what he was saying, ladies and gentlemen?
“The Pilgrims
found that people could not be expected to do
their best work without incentive. So what did
Bradford’s community try next? They unharnessed
the power of good old free enterprise by
invoking” capitalism, “the principle of private
property,” all the way back in the 1600s. It was
incredible. “Every family was assigned its own
plot of land,” and they could do with it
whatever they wanted to do.
“‘This had very
good success,’ wrote Bradford, ‘for it made all
hands industrious, so as much more corn was
planted than otherwise would have been.’” So
when profit was introduced, when the opportunity
to prosper was introduced, it went gangbusters.
That, my friends, is the essence of the True
Story of Thanksgiving. “Now, this is where it
gets really good, folks, if you’re laboring
under the misconception that I was, as I was
taught in school.
“So they set up
trading posts and exchanged goods with the
Indians” after they had enjoyed this prosperity.
It was not the Indians that brought them in
prosperity. It’s not said to insult anybody. The
Indians assisted in their arrival undeniably.
But what led to prosperity for these original
settlers was the common store failed. Socialism
didn’t work.
It’s when they
introduced what turns out to be capitalism. They
didn’t have the name for it, but when they
turned loose individual incentive — keep what
you produce, sell what you don’t need — it went
crazy. This is not something they were taught by
anybody by self-experience. It was not the
Indians. None of this is said to put anybody
down. Don’t misunderstand.
The Indians did
a lot of things that helped them, which I’ll get
to in just a second, but it was their own
industriousness. “[T]hey set up trading posts
and exchanged goods with the Indians.” They sold
stuff to them, and those “profits allowed them
to pay off their debts to the merchants,” their
sponsors in London and in Holland, and you know
what?
The
success of that colony after they had
abandoned socialism and tried what was
essentially capitalism, the word spread
throughout the Old World of this massive
amount of prosperity that was there for the
taking in the New World. And guess what
happened? The New World was flooded with new
arrivals. “[T]he success and prosperity of the
Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans
and began what came to be known as the ‘Great
Puritan Migration.’”
And
all it took was prosperity and the word
spreading across the Atlantic Ocean of how
there was prosperity and it was there for the
taking. All you had to do was get there and
give it a shot. The lesson is — The True Story
of Thanksgiving is — that William Bradford and
his Pilgrim community were thanking God for
the blessings on their community after the
first miserable winter of a documented failure
brought on by their attempt at fairness and
equality, which was socialism.
It
didn’t work.
Only
when they abandoned it did it work — and I
need to say again, because I don’t want people
misunderstand and get noses out of joint. The
Native Americans, the indigenous people, the
Injuns, whatever you want to call ’em, they
were of considerable assistance, and they were
friendly when the Pilgrims arrived. But they
had little, if anything, to do with the
prosperity that occurred.
Because
that was the result of Bradford and the
Pilgrim leadership deciding to change their
structure the Mayflower Compact. Now, Indians
assisted, naturally. I can’t deny it. I mean,
they taught them how to fish and this kind of
thing that they didn’t know how to do, and
that led them to be productive, undeniably so.
But it was the Pilgrim community itself which
experienced this massive prosperity.
The word of
which spread all the way back to the Old World,
Europe across the Atlantic Ocean.
Now, I
mentioned earlier that The Federalist has a
story on all this, and in it they describe much
of what we did in the second book that dealt
with this, the children’s book, Rush Revere and
the Brave Pilgrims. That book goes into great
detail about how the Indians did provide
assistance and what kind of assistance it was,
how valuable it was and how crucial it was.
In Rush Revere
and the Brave Pilgrims, we focus on a Native
American by the name of Squanto. Now, as I told
you, “During the winter of 1620, only 44 out of
the original 102 [Pilgrims] survived, including
their first elected governor of the colony, John
Carver,” and it was “an Indian named Squanto
came to their rescue.” As I say, this is, as I
say, explored in great detail in Rush Revere and
the Brave Pilgrims.
“Squanto was no
ordinary native. Early settlers in 1610 had
captured him and sold him into slavery. A group
of Catholic friars freed him and brought him to
England, where he learned to speak English. In
1618, serving as an interpreter on an English
ship, he was brought back to the New World.” It
was Squanto — who is a famous Native American in
his own right in the Pilgrim story. it was
Squanto who “taught the Pilgrims how to plant
and fish,” how to skin beavers. It was Squanto
who “broker[ed] a peace treaty between the
Pilgrims and other Indian tribes.”
There was more
than one tribe of Indians. It was not copacetic.
It was not friendly and at one with nature. It
was not anything like the multiculturalists
would have you believe. There were squabbles;
there were power struggles; turf battles. It was
human. The Indians, the Pilgrims, everybody was
scrambling for power, for survival.
Survivability was the name of the game. And it
was not guaranteed.
Now, many of
the Pilgrims literally believed that God had
sent Squanto to save them. And they believed,
the Pilgrims believed that without Squanto they
never would have survived, or thrived. And they
experienced a tremendous harvest in 1621, and
that’s the big gathering that is taught in the
history books, the native Indians and the
Pilgrims joined together for a huge feast, which
is the foundational story of the Thanksgiving
story that’s taught in public schools.
But again, that
is not The Real Story of Thanksgiving. That’s
the textbook brand. It did happen, but it’s so
much more than that. And I love taking the
opportunity every year to explain the truth of,
especially now given this election’s apparently,
allegedly fallen out. Because even at the
Federalist — this is so great that the story is
spreading. “One of the most important legacies
of early settlers is that they experimented with
socialism in the 1620s, and it didn’t work.
Private property rights and personal
responsibility, two pillars of a free market
economy, saved the Plymouth colony from
extinction and laid the economic foundation for
he free and prosperous nation that we all enjoy
today.”
And that is
exactly right. And that is The True Story of
Thanksgiving. And that has been what should have
been shared with you every Thanksgiving for the
past 31 years.
(read
more)
2023-11-23
a
SLOUCHES TOWARDS
JERUSALEM
Conservative
Christians who support U.S. military
interventions and blindly support U.S. wars
and military interventions and almost
everything that the state of Israel does do so
because they are warvangelicals, not because
they are dispensationalists (again: or at
least they claim to be or think they are or
others think they are).
Warvangelicals,
Dispensationalism and Israel
Most of my readers
know that I am, unapologetically, a theologically
conservative Christian, but perhaps not all of them
realize that I am also a dispensationalist. But I am
not just any run-of-the-mill dispensationalist. I am
a scholastic dispsensationalist in the tradition of
John F. Walvoord, Lewis Sperry Chafer, Charles C.
Ryrie, Dwight Pentecost, and Alva J. McClain. I have
a whole shelf of books in my library with all of the
major and minor works on dispensationalism,
including books critical of dispensationalism like
that of my late friend Gary North. I also write for
the Journal
of Dispensational Theology. My dispensationalist
bona fides are well known, and should be contrasted
with the pop dispensationalism of Hal Lindsey, Tim
LaHaye, Jerry Jenkins, and John Hagee that sees
everything that happens in the Middle East as
somehow related to biblical prophecy.
The current events
in the Middle East are the impetus for this brief
article, but I could have said what I am going to
say anytime during the last twenty years that I have
been writing about the subject of Christianity and
war.
Many conservative
Christians are dispensationalists (or at least they
claim to be or think they are or others think they
are). Many more conservative Christians blindly
support U.S. wars and military interventions and
almost everything that the state of Israel does. It
is a mistake to blame this on dispensationalism.
Speaking as a
dispensationalist—
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
confound the government of Israel with the people of
Israel.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
support collective punishment by Israel.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
support indiscriminate bombing by Israel.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
dismiss the killing of women and children by Israel
as collateral damage.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
support foreign aid to Israel. I oppose foreign aid
to Israel because I oppose foreign aid to any
country. If Christians in America want to help
Israel, then I would say the same thing to them as I
have said to Christians in America who want to help
Ukraine: Send your own money.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
believe that God needs the help of the United States
to protect the nation of Israel.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
believe that the return of the Jewish people to
their ancient homeland is necessary before the
return of Christ.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to accuse
critics of the government of Israel of being
pro-Palestinian or anti-Jewish.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to label
those who mention the “Israel Lobby” or “Jewish
influence” as anti-Semitic.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
blindly support the actions of the Israeli
government. I don’t support most of the actions any
government (and especially the U.S. government).
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
support U.S. military intervention in the Middle
East. The United States should remain neutral and
not intervene militarily in any foreign region.
There is nothing
about dispensationalism that would lead me to
blindly support Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu. Among other things, he is a false
prophet. Back in 2006, he said that the president of
Iran was another Hitler and that Iran would get a
nuke and threaten the world within five years. But
after two terms as president of Iran, Mahmoud
“Hitler” Ahmadinejad could not run again due to term
limits and faded into obscurity. Netanyahu also once
said “unless the United States stops Iran from
acquiring nuclear weapons, America has only two to
five years left.” Well, the last time I looked,
America was still here. Recently, Netanyahu has
vowed to lead Israel to a “crushing victory” over
Hamas and to “realize the prophecy of Isaiah.” He
then selectively referred to Isaiah 60:18: “Violence
shall no more be heard in thy land, wasting nor
destruction within thy borders; but thou shalt call
thy walls Salvation, and thy gates Praise.”
Dispensationalists of all people should recognize
that this is a prophecy of a future restored Israel
that does not describe Israel today.
There
is nothing about dispensationalism that would lead
me to make such open-ended, blanket statements as
“I stand with Israel” or “I support Israel.” What
do these statements actually mean? Do they mean
that I stand with Israel’s right to exist? Do they
mean that I support the right of Israel to defend
itself? I would certainly agree with both of those
statements. But if that is what they mean, than
that is what should be said. Just saying that you
“stand with Israel” or that you “support Israel”
could be taken to mean almost anything. Do
conservative Christians support Israel’s annual
gay pride parades in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv? Do
conservative Christians stand with the Israeli
government’s view toward Christian proselytizing
in Israel? Do conservative Christians support the
Israeli government expanding its Families of
Fallen Soldiers Law to include the common-law
partners of LGBTQ members of the Israel Defense
Forces? Do conservative Christians stand with
Israel’s draconian Covid policies during 2020 and
2021? Do conservative Christians support the 1967
attack on the USS Liberty by Israel?
All of these things
being said, I am certainly not pro-Hamas,
pro-Palestinian, or pro-Arab, so please don’t bother
writing to accuse me of these things or chastise me
for not being sufficiently pro-Israel. My
unfavorable opinion of Islam is well known, and I
will not get into it here. If someone wants to
believe that Muhammad is God’s prophet, then so be
it. I believe in freedom of conscience, even if the
governments and religious leaders in Muslim
countries don’t. When it comes to religion, you can
believe anything you want, just so long as you don’t
aggress against others that disagree, no matter what
they say or write about your religious views or
commit acts of violence against others in the cause
of your religion.
Conservative
Christians who support U.S. military interventions
and blindly support U.S. wars and military
interventions and almost everything that the state
of Israel does do so because they are
warvangelicals, not because they are
dispensationalists (again: or at least they claim
to be or think they are or others think they are).
I have written
about the errors of these evangelical warvangelicals
and their cousins Christian jihadists, Old Testament
Christians, Christian armchair warriors, theological
schizophrenics, Christian Coalition moralists,
nuclear Christians, Janus Christians, Catholic just
war theorists, reich-wing Christian nationalists,
theocon Values Voters, imperial Christians,
pro-lifers for mass murder, Red-State Christian
fascists, bloodthirsty Christian conservatives, beam
Christians, nuclear Christians, Christian Coalition
moralists, double-minded Christians, Christian
warmongers, God and country Christian bumpkins,
sniper theologians, Christian military idolaters,
conservative Christian militarists, and members of
the Christian axis of evil for many years (see my
list of articles on Christianity
and war and my articles on Christianity
and the military).
Although many have
asked, I have no comments or recommendations to make
about the events in the Middle East. There is no
solution to the perpetual trouble there. There will
be no peace in the Middle East until the return of
the Prince of Peace. (read
more)
2023-11-22
c
COLLATERAL DAMAGE
III
ASSUMPTIONS FALL BY
THE WAYSIDE
@bronzeagemantis Twitter
2023-11-22
b
COLLATERAL
DAMAGE II
I do not want any Gazan children to
be collateral damage. My Jewish values,
along with what I’ve learned advocating for
Palestinian statehood, continue to affirm
my belief in the importance of upholding the
rights of Palestinian civilians.
Hamas Killed My Wokeness
I’ve found a home
on the progressive left for years—even after I
noticed a common blind spot around Jewish issues.
But the reaction to the murderous attacks on
Israeli civilians was the final straw.
In high school in
the early 2000s, I assumed the role of Palestine
in our semesterlong “Model U.N.” class. It was, in
part, a feeble act of rebellion against spending
weekends at a Conservative synagogue during my
angstiest years.
Although
my comprehension of the Middle East conflict was
in its infancy, an innate sense of justice drove
me to defend the Palestinian cause. To
characterize my choice as merely “rebellion,”
then, doesn’t capture the full picture. My
mother, a New Yorker with fierce feminist
beliefs, raised me with quintessentially
progressive Jewish values. I was taught that we,
as Jews, stand with the oppressed—because we were
the oppressed. This sentiment was often
reinforced by my grandparents who arrived in
America penniless, the Nazis hounding at their
heels.
I
took my role seriously, making it my mission to
call for an immediate halt to the bulldozing of
Palestinian homes in the West Bank and Gaza. I
plunged into extensive research and armed myself
with the knowledge to effectively champion a
two-state solution—a belief I passionately held
in high school and continue to endorse today.
Later,
as a man in his 20s, it was only natural that I
found myself firmly situated within the
progressive left. I never once questioned my
political home. Guided by my Jewish
values, during the George Floyd tragedy and the
racial reckoning that followed, I wholeheartedly
embraced anti-racism initiatives. I read Ibram X.
Kendi and Robin DiAngelo, and I even took on the
role of facilitating international dialogues on
collective sense-making and healing. I strove to be a good “white ally.”
Truly, I did.
Then
came a flexion point: During a 2021 Bay Area
psychotherapy training, in a “processing
session” around race, a woman vulnerably shared
her firsthand experience with a horrific act of
antisemitic hatred. To my astonishment, the two
facilitators, both white women, chastised
her—yes, chastised—stressing the session’s
emphasis on anti-Black racism. This episode
unveiled a disconcerting bias in this community
that routinely minimized antisemitism, to the
point it was no longer considered “legitimate”
racism. The young Jewish woman who’d shared was
cowed into silence. From within my depths, I
could hear my grandfather’s groan from eternity:
This,
still, here?
At
that moment, it became clear to me that
“wokeness,” or whatever term we may use to
describe the new progressive social justice
ideology, didn’t seem fully compatible with the
perspective I had developed in a family that was
very liberal because of our lineage of
Holocaust survivors.
Since
then, I’ve struggled to find my political
footing while maintaining a commitment to the
pursuit of truth and justice. I started noticing
the sinister shadow of postmodern progressivism
everywhere: a seeming insistence on “pluralism”
that, in practice, often lacks genuine
embodiment and quickly devolves into its own
form of dogmatic and reductive tribalism.
I
began to feel as though I had been baited into
an
a priori
virtuous worldview that, in a twisted way, sows
more division than it does healing; more
concerned, as it is, with retribution than
reconciliation. That my Judaism was utterly
swept away (even shadow-demonized) in the
context of this conversation only left me more
disillusioned.
Yet
my affiliation with progressivism persisted. Say
what one will about the oversimplifications and
occasional insincerities of the progressive
left, I told myself, their hearts were in the
right place.
Then,
two weeks ago, Hamas [with Mossad complicity]
grotesquely murdered 1,400 Israeli citizens,
including 270 at a pro-peace music festival, a
gathering my friends and I would have joyously
attended if we were in the Holy Land. While
these events were deeply disturbing to me, and
all fellow members of the diaspora, what was
even more shocking was the response from
segments of the online left back home. These are
progressive groups that, ostensibly, should
cherish all human life and
abhor all
wanton
violence.
Instead, many
celebrated—yes, celebrated—these attacks as a form
of “anti-colonialist resistance.” Memes
circulated, like the now infamous Chicago
#BLM paratrooper, that quite literally
glorified an unimaginable slaughtering. Student
groups at
Harvard decried Israel as “entirely responsible”
for Hamas’ attack; groups at the
University of Virginia went a step further
in saying that “colonized people can resist
occupation of their land by whatever means they
deem necessary”; and groups at Tufts took the cake
by praising Hamas’ ingenious creativity.
The
straw that broke my proverbial “progressive”
back occurred last Thursday, when students at a
high school in the Bay Area, my home for the
last 15 years, were seen
chanting “From the river to the sea, Palestine
will be free.” They marched in the hallways of a
public school ringing the jihadist rallying call
that implicitly calls for the erasure of the
State of Israel. And all those who live within it.
Do
these high schoolers, who are the same age I was
when I debated on behalf of Palestine in Model
U.N., grasp the underlying antisemitic
implications of their words? Or might they
simply be aligning with a far-left mindset that
unreservedly and reductively supports the
“oppressed”?
Zooming out, it
has become clear to me, and devoid of the
Israeli-Palestinian context, there’s a dark
reality: Our Western culture is riddled with
ambient antisemitism. Screeds by such celebrities
as Kanye West testify to the fact. As Israel is
pulled into a conflict governed by jihadist game
theory—where civilians are intentionally used as
shields so that dead children can be broadcast as
propaganda puppets on social media—antisemitism
has and surely will continue to intensify around
the world. In London, antisemitic hate crimes have
already risen by 1,350%. Watch it grow,
worldwide.
Yet, it’s the
latter question—how so many hypereducated students
have steadfastly embraced far-left ideology—that
raises my greatest concern for our future. This
should not have to be said, but if you find
yourself mourning some civilian deaths while
celebrating any others, there’s an
objective problem with your worldview. And you.
The notion that one can distill our world’s most
complex, historically dynamic, and challenging
conflict into simplistic binaries is so utterly
absurd that it clearly exposes the shortcomings of
“woke” ideology. Or any dogmatism, for that
matter.
Outside of
lacking vital historical context, I’ve been aghast
to learn that this branch of the progressive left
does not seem to understand why such horrors were
committed upon Israeli citizens. Unfortunately,
there is an explanation beyond “colonial
resistance”—radical jihadism. Granted, not all
forms of jihadism are based on terrorism, and all
Muslims are, of course, not jihadists. But make no
mistake: The ones who are responsible for these
brutal acts of murder, rape, and mutilation are
radical jihadists. Groups like Hamas are, quite
literally, death cults that are not
consequentially distinct from Nazism—the death
cult that systematically annihilated my
grandparents’ entire extended family. The cult
that the Allied West had no confusion about
needing to destroy. Hamas’ stated intention is the
eradication, first, of Israeli Jews—then all Jews
everywhere. That is a genocidal agenda. The IDF,
with all its flaws, which are numerous and
sometimes deadly, avoids civilian Palestinian
deaths whenever and however possible. That is the
opposite of a genocidal agenda.
I truly wish it
were as simple as reducing this conflict to an
oppressor/oppressed dynamic. I am waiting, with
horror, as Israel prepares for a ground invasion
that will claim thousands of thoroughly innocent
lives. I do not want any Gazan children to be
collateral damage. My Jewish values, along with
what I’ve learned advocating for Palestinian
statehood, continue to affirm my belief in the
importance of upholding the rights of Palestinian
civilians.
Any
ideology that “justifies” or minimizes the
tragedy of civilian casualties is broken and
perverse. That is not to say that all
such casualties are avoidable. Reform Jews of my
generation are unified in a desire for a two-state
solution that provides Palestinians with safety,
dignity, and rights. Over the past two weeks, I
have heard no American Jew wish violence upon
Gazans; I’ve witnessed many American so-called
progressives who wish violence upon Jews. In
response to raped teenagers and headless babies, a
common leftist online refrain has been: “What did
you think decolonization looked like?”
That’s not
progressivism. That’s bloodthirst. (read
more)
2023-11-22
a
COLLATERAL DAMAGE I
Protocol
№5, paragraph 5:
... But it has paid us, though we
have sacrificed many of our people.
Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of
God a thousand GOYIM.
Israel Admits It Killed Some Of Its Own
At Nova Music Festival
An Israeli police
investigation into the Hamas attack on the Nova
music festival near the Gaza border on October 7
revealed that an Israeli attack helicopter killed
some of the attendees, Haaretz reported on Saturday.
According to a
police source, an investigation into the incident
showed that an Israeli combat helicopter that
arrived at the scene from the Ramat David base fired
at Hamas fighters and other Palestinians who crossed
through the border fence from Gaza into Israel, but also fired
on some of the Israelis attending the music
festival. According to the police, 364 people in
total were killed there.
The Israeli
military and rescue services previously claimed that
260 Israelis were killed at the festival, all by
Hamas and Palestinians in a deliberate massacre. But
this is the
first acknowledgement that Israeli forces killed
some of their own.
Previous reports in
Israeli media revealed that Israeli
forces killed Israeli civilians in Be’eri, a
settlement also near the Gaza border. In that case,
Hamas fighters were holding Israelis captive in
homes. When the Israeli military arrived, it opened
fire, including by firing tank shells, killing both
Israeli captives and Hamas fighters.
Three of those
killed in Be’eri by Israeli tank fire were
12-year-old Liel Hezroni, her brother Yanai, and
their aunt Ayla. Israeli broadcaster Kan reported that Liel’s
relatives held a farewell ceremony for her, rather
than a burial ceremony, because her body could not
be recovered from the house that collapsed on her
and other Hamas captives after an Israeli tank fired
two shells into it.
A similar instance
occurred in Sderot, where Hamas fighters had taken over the local
police station, and were holding Israeli police
captive inside. Both the Hamas fighters and Israeli
police were killed when the Israeli army fired tank shells at the
police station, killing everyone. Israeli forces
then bulldozed the station.
It is
therefore unclear how many of the
Israelis who died on 7 October were killed by Hamas,
whose fighters were seeking to take as many
Israelis, both soldiers and civilians, captive back
to Gaza as possible, and how many were killed by
Israeli forces refusing to negotiate for the
captives’ release.
Israel initially
claimed Hamas and Palestinians killed 1,400 Israelis
on October 7, including soldiers, police, and
civilians, but later revised the count to 1,200. Israeli spokesperson
Mark Regev acknowledged that 200 of the alleged
victims were Hamas fighters or Palestinians whose
bodies were burned so badly that Israeli authorities
could not initially identify them and assumed them
to be Israelis.
In an interview
with MSNBC on Friday, he stated, "We originally said,
in the atrocious Hamas attack upon our people on
October 7th, we had the number at 1,400 casualties
and now
we’ve revised that down to 1,200 because we
understood that we’d overestimated, we made a mistake.
There were
actually bodies that were so badly burnt we
thought they were ours, in the end apparently they
were Hamas terrorists."
Regarding the Nova festival, Haaretz reported as well
that, "There is a growing assessment in the security
establishment that the terrorists who carried out
the massacre on October 7 did not know in advance
about the Nova festival held near Kibbutz Re'im, and
decided to come to the place after discovering that
a mass event was taking place there." The Hamas
fighters had initially intended to attack nearby
settlements in what is known as the Gaza envelope.
According to Haaretz, senior security
officials estimate that Hamas found out about the
existence of the party using drones, and directed
its fighters to the location using their
communication system. In a video from a body camera
of one Hamas fighter, "he is heard asking a captured
Israeli for directions to reach the bad guys, even
though he was in a different area." One of the
findings that strengthens the assessment, according
to the police and other security officials, is that
the first Hamas fighters arrived at the Nova
festival from the direction of road 232 and not from
the direction of the Gaza border fence. (read
more)
2023-11-21
b
THE STATE
OF THE DISUNION IX
WHAT HATH THE FAKE PANDEMIC WROUGHT?
A diminution of the niceties,
a collapse of civility & civilization,
and an end of an era.
TO OUR VALUED
SIGNATURE ROOM COMMUNITY
After over three
decades of creating cherished memories, it is with
profound sadness that we announce the permanent
closure of the iconic Signature Room at the 95th,
effective Thursday, September 28, 2023.
For over 30 years,
we have had the privilege and honor of serving
Chicagoans and visitors from all over the world.
Together, we’ve marked countless life moments – from
heartwarming engagements to milestone anniversaries.
Unfortunately, after the closure of
our city and restaurant due to the COVID-19
pandemic, we have been faced with severe economic
hardship and the challenges have been greater than
we anticipated.
These factors,
beyond our control, have left us with no choice but
to close our doors.
Though this chapter
ends, our gratitude for your unwavering support
remains steadfast. Every meal served, every toast
raised, and every memory made was possible because
of you. We are eternally grateful for the trust you
placed in us to be part of your special moments.
We appreciate your
patience as we navigate this unexpected challenge.
We will do our best to reach out and address all
questions.
With heartfelt
appreciation,
Rick Roman
and Nick Pyknis
(source)
2023-11-21
a
THE STATE
OF THE DISUNION VIII
“Jesus would get
vaccinated.”
Hey, Woke Church, It’s Time to Wake Up!
I recently finished
reading a very timely and hard-hitting book zeroing
in on the American church called, Woke
Jesus: The False Messiah Destroying Christianity by Lucas Miles. Much of
what Miles writes about in Woke Jesus rings true with me and
my experiences with what passes as a Christian
response to the evil we see all around us and all
over the world today.
The battle against
evil is heating up, especially when we consider what
[was allowed to have] happened just a few short
weeks ago on October 7th in Israel. It’s hard to
believe that, after that barbaric, sickening attack
on innocent, unarmed citizens you will still find
Christians saying, “Well, there’s good and bad on both sides.” These
Christians seem to be hedging their bets, intent on
not offending the wrong people perhaps, and are
careful to remain lukewarm in their response to
anything controversial. Even when the evil is over
the top, they cannot find it in their hearts (or
theology) to admit what’s staring all of us right in
the face: What Hamas [and their enablers] did was
pure evil.
If the church
doesn’t wake up and stop being woke, this nation—and
by extension, the world—is a goner.
One
of the biggest takeaways from Woke Jesus is what Lucas Miles
sees as the proper use of the word “Christian
Nationalist.” Miles makes a solid case for
applying the term to any church that goes along
with the Far-Left agenda since it’s very apparent
that the Far-Left is now solidly in charge of the
federal (and many state) governing bodies. The
churches in this category are obvious: As a rule
of thumb, any church that flies the rainbow or BLM
(or both) flags, and any church that looks the
other way and doesn’t preach against the idea of
children being urged to consider changing their
immutable, biologically-determined sex—or the
grooming of children—these churches support and
advance those issues which are front-and-center on
the national agenda.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87593/875938b902631fc262cb2ff2b3413abe5cf1f7fd" alt=""
Image by AI.
Want
another example? Churches that obeyed orders from
the government and coerced congregants into taking
the (experimental) COVID-19 vaccine. Some, as
Miles points out, used guilt-ladened arguments
like, “Is your freedom in Christ more important
than other people’s health?” Or (and this is my
all-time favorite), “Jesus would get vaccinated.”
When I read that
Jesus would get the jab, it recalled a couple verses
I thought I might have read in some obscure
translation of the New Testament. Verses like, “And Jesus could do
no more miracles in that town because he was laid
up for three days with a really bad flu.” And, “Jesus could not
continue adding more Beatitudes to the list
because of his persistent, hacking cough.” I’m going to take a
wild guess here, but I believe that Jesus not only
healed the sick and raised the dead and took away
the sins of the world—but He was the healthiest
human that ever walked planet Earth.
Fortunately, Lucas
Miles isn’t the only Christian influencer eagerly
trying to wake up a sleeping church. There are quite
a few others who have boldly jumped into the fray
over the past many years.
Jonathan Cahn, in
his book, Return
of the Gods, along with Eric
Metaxas’s Letter
to the American Church, are but two additional
“voices crying in the wilderness” (or “watchmen on
the wall,” if you will) who are trying desperately
to shake Christians from their slumber. Their books
and their “ministries” (Cahn in the pulpit every
weekend at Beth Israel Worship Center in Wayne, New
Jersey, and Metaxas every day on his
nationally-syndicated radio program) address the
warning that came from George Orwell in the late
1940s. Was Orwell observing we who inhabit the 2020s
when he wrote this?
We
have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of
the obvious is the first duty of intelligent
men. If liberty means anything at all, it means
the right to tell people what they do not want
to hear. In times of universal deceit, telling
the truth will be a revolutionary act.
So, where is the
“revolutionary” spirit that was shown by the
Apostles in the first century when they preached a
countercultural perspective of love and human value
against a strong-arm system of war prevalent in the
overwhelming power of the Roman Empire? Or that same
spirit when colonial Christians joined the fight for
independence in the mid- to late-1700s? Where is
that spirit in our current Church? Have church men
and women of today become church mice?
For almost six
years, I was the producer and sidekick on The Eric Metaxas
Show,
part of the Salem Radio lineup and TBN’s (Trinity
Broadcasting Network’s) weekend programming. In the
past, Eric has interviewed a variety of guests with
varying viewpoints, from Morgan Freeman to Ron
Howard to President Trump. As part of his eclectic
mix, Eric has been constantly interviewing guests
(most recently, Victor Davis Hanson, Naomi Wolf, Ben
Stein, Roger Stone, and Dinesh D’Souza) alerting us
to dangerous shifts in our culture, in our churches,
and in our government.
Eric challenges his
listeners to get off the couch and get involved—to
be silent, to say nothing, is signaling both consent
and compliance. And Eric advises that answering the
call can be anything from voting; to poll-watching;
to writing letters to the editors of local and
national papers; to “speaking the truth” in love
where you work, in your school, and even in your
church when it is careening off its holy-roller
rails.
During The Eric Metaxas
Show’s
weekly segment called “Ask Metaxas,” a listener
wrote about a year ago to ask me, the sidekick, a
question: “What’s the best part and the worst part
of working with Eric?”
Of course, the best
part was having the best seat in the house when it
came to hearing Eric’s views on everything from
politics, to culture, to living a godly life—and
being able to chime in with a quick thought or
quirky, funny observation here and there.
But the worst part
was being made aware daily, as part of a news and
entertainment network, that we were in a battle
where not everyone who should be doing their part
was doing it. I stated on-air that it was as if Eric
and I were fighting in the Alamo. There were
thousands of Santa Anna’s soldiers coming against
fewer than 200 defenders of our old Spanish mission.
That was bad enough
for Eric and me, but what made it worse was that it
seemed as if half of the other fighters inside the Alamo were shooting
at us—or they were chiding us
for even fighting at all instead of being “good
Christian men” who should show love to everybody.
But who can dispute
the fact that we are now being overrun by evil?
Isn’t now
finally the time to wake up?
I would hope that
all Americans, whether Christian or not, might pick
up one of the books I highlighted here and seriously
consider some of the practical suggestions they will
find within their pages. The hour is certainly late.
But if enough of us look for the opportunities, God
might still bless America, and the victory can be
won “with the Light from above.” (read
more)
2023-11-20
d
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION VII
WHEN PROTESTANT
PASTORS LED THEIR LAMBS
TO THE CLOT SHOT
SLAUGHTER
How The Federal Government Used
Evangelical Leaders To Spread Covid Propaganda To
Churches
In September, Wheaton
College dean Ed Stetzer interviewed
National Institutes of Health Director Francis
Collins on his podcast, “Church Leadership” about
why Christians who want to obey Christ’s command to
love their neighbors should get the Covid vaccine
and avoid indulging in misinformation.
For those not familiar with Stetzer, he’s not
just a religious liberal arts professor and this
wasn’t just another dime-a-dozen pastorly podcast. To
name just a few of his past and present titles in the
evangelical world, Stetzer is also the executive
director of the Billy Graham Center and the
editor-in-chief of Outreach media group. He was
previously an editor at Christianity Today and an
executive director at LifeWay, one of the largest
religious publishers in the world. That’s to say
nothing of the dozen-plus books on missions and church
planting he’s authored.
In short, when it
comes to leveraging high evangelical offices to
influence everyday Christians, arguably no one is
better positioned than Ed Stetzer. You may not know
his name, but if you’re a church-going Protestant,
it’s almost guaranteed your pastor does.
Which is why, when
Stetzer joined a line of renowned pastors and
ministry leaders lending their platforms to
Obama-appointee Collins, the collaboration was
noteworthy.
During their
discussion, Collins and Stetzer were hardly shy about
the fact that they were asking ministers to act as the
administration’s go-between with their congregants. “I
want to exhort pastors once again to try to use your
credibility with your flock to put forward the public
health measures that we know can work," Collins said.
Stetzer replied that he sometimes hears from ministers
who don't feel comfortable preaching about covid
vaccines, and he advises them, in those cases to
simply promote the jab through social media.
(read
more)
2023-11-20
c
THE
STATE OF THE DISUNION
VI
THE MALEFACTORS OF A CLOCKWORK ORANGE
HAVE
BECOME THE SOCIOPATHS-OF-COLOR OF URBAN AMERICA
I first saw Kubrick's film auf Deutsch
in a Berlin cinema.
That version is even more chilling than what
Americans saw.
A Prophetic and Violent Masterpiece
Linguistically
inventive, socially prescient, and philosophically
profound, A Clockwork Orange comes close to being
a work of genius.
When, as a medical
student, I emerged from the cinema having watched
Stanley Kubrick’s controversial film of A
Clockwork Orange, I was astonished and
horrified to see a group of young men outside
dressed up as droogs, the story’s adolescent thugs
who delighted in what they called “ultra-violence.”
The film had been
controversial in Britain; its detractors, who wanted
it banned, charged that it glamorized and thereby
promoted violence. The young men dressed as droogs
seemed to confirm the charge, though of course it is
one thing to imitate a form of dress and quite
another to imitate behavior. Still, even a merely
sartorial identification with psychopathic violence
shocked me, for it implied an imaginative sympathy
with such violence; and seeing those young men
outside the theater was my first intimation that
art, literature, and ideas might have profound—and
not necessarily favorable—social consequences. A
year later, a group of young men raped a 17-year-old
girl in Britain as they sang “Singing in the Rain,”
a real-life replay of one of the film’s most
notorious scenes.
The author of the
book, Anthony Burgess, a polymath who once wrote
five novels in a year, came to dislike this
particular work intensely, not because of any
practical harm to society that the film version of
it might have caused but because he did not want to
go down in literary history as the author of a book
made famous, or notorious, by a movie. Irrespective
of the value of his other work, however, A
Clockwork Orange remains a novel of
immense power. Linguistically inventive, socially
prophetic, and philosophically profound, it comes
very close to being a work of genius.
The story, set in the
England of the near future (the book was published
in 1962), is simple. The narrator, Alex, a
precocious 15-year-old psychopath who has no feeling
for others, leads a small gang in many acts of
gratuitous, and much enjoyed, violence. Eventually,
caught after a murder, he goes to prison,
where—after another murder—the authorities offer to
release him if he submits to a form of aversive
conditioning against violence called the Ludovico
Method. On his release, however, he attempts suicide
by jumping out of a window, receiving a head injury
that undoes his conditioning against violence. Once
more he becomes the leader of a gang.
In the final
chapter of the book’s British version, Alex again
rejects violence, this time because he discovers
within himself, spontaneously, a source of human
tenderness that makes him want to settle down and
have a baby. In the American edition—which Stanley
Kubrick used—this last chapter is missing: Alex is
not redeemed a second time, but returns, apparently
once and for all, to the enjoyment of arbitrary and
antisocial violence. In this instance, it is the
British who were the optimists and the Americans the
pessimists: Burgess’s American publisher, wanting
the book to end unhappily, omitted the last chapter.
Burgess had been a
schoolteacher (like William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies) and evidently sensed a
stirring of revolt among the youth of his country
and elsewhere in the West, a revolt with which—as a
deeply unconventional man who felt himself to be an
outsider however wealthy or famous he became, and
who drank deep at the well of resentment as well as
of spirituous liquors—he felt some sympathy and
might even have helped in a small way to foment. And
yet, as a man who was also deeply steeped in
literary culture and tradition, he understood the
importance of the shift of cultural authority from
the old to the young and was very far from sanguine
about its effects. He thought that the shift would
lead to a hell on earth and the destruction of all
that he valued.
He marks the separateness
of his novel’s young protagonists from their elders
by their adoption of a new argot, as well as a new
form of dress. Vital for groups antagonistic toward
the dominant society around them, such argots allow
them to identify and communicate with insiders and
exclude outsiders. Although I worked in a prison for
14 years, for example, I never came to understand
the language that prisoners used as they shouted to
one another across landings and between buildings.
It was their means of resisting domination. In the
French banlieues,
les jeunes use an argot derived from words spelled and
pronounced backward—and completely incomprehensible
to educated speakers of French. People of Jamaican
descent in Britain use a patois when they want not
to be understood by anyone else. The connection
between argot and criminal purposes has long been
close, of course; and the importance that Burgess
ascribes to the new argot in A Clockwork Orange suggests that he saw
youthful revolt as an expression more of
self-indulgence and criminality than of idealism—the
latter, shallower view becoming orthodoxy among
intellectuals not long after A Clockwork Orange appeared.
Burgess’s creation
of a completely convincing new argot more or less ex nihilo is an
extraordinary achievement. Nadsat (Russian for “teen”),
as its speakers call it, is a mixture of anglicized
Russian words—particularly provocative at the height
of the cold war—and Cockney rhyming slang. As a
linguistic invention, it is the equal of Orwell’s
Newspeak. Alex, the narrator, though cold-blooded
and self-centered, is intelligent and expresses
himself with great force. A vocabulary that is
entirely new and incomprehensible at the beginning
of the book becomes so thoroughly familiar to the
reader at the end that he forgets that he has ever
had to learn its meaning: it seems completely
natural after only a hundred pages. On the very
first page, when Alex describes his gang’s intention
to do a robbery, he says:
[T]here was no
real need . . . of crasting [robbing] any more
pretty polly [money] to tolchock [hit] some old
veck [man] in an alley and viddy [see] him swim in
his blood while we counted the takings and divided
by four, nor to do the ultra-violent on some
shivering starry [old] grey-haired ptitsa [woman]
in a shop and go smecking [laughing] off with the
till’s guts.
Of course, the lack
of real “need” does not prevent Alex and his gang
from robbing in a cruel and violent way, for their
cruelty and violence is an end in itself, joyfully
engaged in. Not for Burgess was the orthodox liberal
view that economic deprivation and lack of
opportunity cause crime.
The gang’s
solipsistic and dehumanizing argot reflects this
cold-bloodedness. Sexual intercourse, for example,
becomes “the old in-out-in-out,” a term without
reference to the other participant, who is merely an
object. The gang attacks a schoolteacher carrying
books home from the library, for no reason other
than a free-floating malevolence and joy in cruelty:
Pete held his
rookers [hands] and Georgie sort of hooked his rot
[mouth] wide open for him and Dim yanked out his
false zoobies [teeth], upper and lower. He threw
these down on the pavement and then I treated them
to the old boot-crush, though they were hard
bastards like. . . . The old veck [man] began to
make sort of chumbling shooms [sounds]—“wuf waf
wof”—so Georgie let go of holding his goobers
[jaws] apart and just let him have one in the
toothless rot with his ringy fist, and that made
the old veck start moaning a lot then, then out
comes the blood, my brothers, real beautiful.
I doubt that a lack
of feeling for others has ever been expressed more
powerfully.
Burgess intuited with
almost prophetic acuity both the nature and
characteristics of youth culture when left to its
own devices, and the kind of society that might
result when that culture became predominant. For
example, adults grow afraid of the young and defer
to them, something that has certainly come to pass
in Britain, where adults now routinely look away as
youngsters commit antisocial acts in public, for
fear of being knifed if they do otherwise, and
mothers anxiously and deferentially ask their
petulant five-year-old children what they would like
to eat, in the hope of averting tantrums. The result
is that adolescents and young men take any refusal
of a request as lèse-majesté, a challenge to the
integrity of their ego. When I refused to prescribe
medicine that young men wanted but that I thought
they did not need, they would sometimes answer in
aggrieved disbelief, “No? What do you mean, no?” It
was not a familiar concept. And in a sense, my
refusal was pointless, insofar as any such young man
would soon enough find a doctor whom he could
intimidate into prescribing what he wanted. Burgess
would not have been surprised by this state of
affairs: he saw it coming.
When Alex and his
gang enter a pub—they are underage, but no one dares
challenge them—they spread fear by their mere
presence.
Now we were the
very good malchicks [boys], smiling good evensong
to one and all, though these wrinkled old lighters
[people] started to get all shook, their veiny old
rookers all trembling round their glasses, and
making the suds [drink] spill on the table. “Leave
us be, lads,” said one of them, her face all mappy
with being a thousand years old, “we’re only poor
old women.”
Intimidation of the
aged and contempt for age itself are an essential
part of the youth culture: no wonder aging rock
stars are eternal adolescents, wrinkled and
arthritic but trapped in the poses of youth. Age for
them means nothing but indignity.
Alex’s parents (one
of the things Burgess didn’t foresee is the rise of
the single-parent family) are afraid of him. He
comes home late and plays his music very loud, but
“Pee and em [Father and Mother] . . . had learnt now
not to knock on the wall with complaints of what
they called noise. I had taught them. Now they would
take sleep-pills.” When Alex’s father wants to know
what he does at night—Alex is only 15—he is
apologetic and deferential: “ ‘Not that I want to
pry, son, but where exactly is it you go to work of
evenings?’ . . . My dad was like humble mumble
chumble. ‘Sorry, son,’ he said. ‘But I get worried
sometimes.’ ”
When in a symbolic
reversal of the direction of authority Alex offers
his father some money (robbed, of course) so that he
can buy himself a drink in the pub, his father says:
“Thanks, son. . . . But we don’t go out much now. We
daren’t go out much, the streets being what they
are. Young hooligans and so on. Still, thanks.”
In 1962, the idea
that the young would someday impose upon old people
in Britain a de
facto after-dark curfew was still
unimaginable, but Burgess, seeing the cloud no
bigger than a man’s hand on the horizon, imagined
that outcome very vividly. With a prophet’s
imagination, he saw what would happen when the cloud
grew until it covered the sky.
With like prescience,
Burgess foresaw many other aspects of the youth
culture to come: the importance that mind-altering
drugs and an industrialized pop music would play in
it, for example. (Burgess did not, however, suggest
that high culture was necessarily ennobling in
itself. Alex, much superior in intelligence to his
followers, is a devotee of classical music,
listening to which, however, increases his urge to
commit violence. No doubt Burgess had in mind those
Nazis who could listen with emotion to Schubert
lieder after a hard day’s genocide.)
Burgess foresaw the
importance that the youth culture would attach to
sexual precocity and a kind of disabused
knowingness. In a remarkable rape scene, Alex meets
two ten-year-old girls who, like him, are skipping
school, in a record shop, where they are listening
to pop music with suggestive titles such as “Night
after Day after Night.”
They saw
themselves, you could see, as real grown-up
devotchkas [girls] already, what with the old
hipswing when they saw your Faithful Narrator,
brothers, and padded groodies [breasts] and red
all ploshed on their goobers [lips]. . . . [T]hey
viddied [saw] themselves as real sophistoes. . . .
They had the same ideas or lack of, and the same
colour hair—a like dyed strawy. Well, they would
grow up real today. . . . No school this
afterlunch, but education certain, Alex as
teacher.
Their education
that afternoon consists of repeated rape by an
already experienced 15-year-old.
It would not have
surprised Burgess that magazines for ten- or
11-year-old girls are now full of advice about how
to make themselves sexually attractive, that girls
of six or seven are dressed by their single mothers
in costumes redolent of prostitution, or that there
has been a compression of generations, so that
friendships are possible between 14- and
26-year-olds. The precocity necessary to avoid
humiliation by peers prevents young people from
maturing further and leaves them in a state of
petrified adolescence. Persuaded that they already
know all that is necessary, they are disabused about
everything, for fear of appearing naive. With no
deeper interests, they are prey to gusts of
hysterical and childish enthusiasm; only
increasingly extreme sensation can arouse them from
their mental torpor. Hence the epidemic of
self-destructiveness that has followed in the wake
of the youth culture.
The world in which youth
culture predominates and precocity is the highest
achievement is one in which all tenderness is
absent. When Alex and his gang attack the teacher,
they find a letter in his pocket, which one of them
reads out derisively: “My darling one . . . I shall
be thinking of you while you are away and hope you
will remember to wrap up warm when you go out at
night.”
Such simple and
heartfelt affection and concern for another person
are extinct in the world of Alex and his droogs.
Alex is incapable of putting himself in the place of
anyone else, of “changing places in fancy with the
sufferer,” as Adam Smith puts it. Self-absorbed, he
is self-pitying but has no pity for others. When he
is arrested after the brutal murder of an old woman,
he calls the policemen who have arrested him
“bullies” and accuses them when they laugh at him of
“the heighth of . . . callousness.” Alex is quite
incapable of connecting his own savage behavior with
the words that he applies to the police. I was
reminded of a case of murder in which I gave
testimony recently: the young murderer kicked his
girlfriend’s head so hard that he broke her jaw in
many places and forced her tongue through the back
of her throat, and her stomach filled with blood—and
a neighbor heard him laugh as he kicked. A
policeman, after listening to his lies and evasions
for two days, accused him of having no remorse for
his deed. “You ’ave no feelings,” the murderer
rejoined. “I pity your poor wife”—just like Alex in
A
Clockwork Orange, but without the
intelligence and the taste for classical music.
In the world of
Alex and his droogs, all relations with other human
beings are instrumental means to a selfish, brutal,
hedonistic end. And this is the world that so many
of my patients now inhabit, a world in which perhaps
a third of the British population lives. It is also
the world in which having a baby is the fulfillment
of a personal human right, and nothing else.
But Burgess was not
merely a social and cultural prophet. A Clockwork Orange grapples as well with
the question of the origin and nature of good and
evil. The Ludovico Method that Alex undergoes in
prison as a means of turning him into a model
citizen in exchange for his release is in essence a
form of conditioning. Injected with a drug that
induces nausea, Alex must then watch films of the
kind of violence that he himself committed, his head
and eyelids held so that he cannot escape the images
by looking away from them—all this to the piped-in
accompaniment of the classical music that he loves.
Before long, such violence, either in imagery or in
reality, as well as the sound of classical music,
causes him nausea and vomiting even without the
injection, as a conditioned response. Alex learns to
turn the other cheek, as a Christian should: when he
is insulted, threatened, or even struck, he does not
retaliate. After the treatment—at least, until he
suffers his head injury—he can do no other.
Two scientists,
Drs. Branom and Brodsky, are in charge of the
“treatment.” The minister of the interior,
responsible for cutting crime in a society now
besieged by the youth culture, says: “The Government
cannot be concerned any longer with outmoded
penological theories . . . . Common criminals . . .
can best be dealt with on a purely curative basis.
Kill the criminal reflex, that’s all.” In other
words, a criminal or violent act is, in essence, no
different from the act of a rat in a cage, who
presses a lever in order to obtain a pellet of food.
If you shock the rat with electricity when it
presses the lever instead of rewarding it with food,
it will soon cease to press the lever. Criminality
can be dealt with, or “cured,” in the same way.
At the time that
Burgess wrote A Clockwork Orange, doctors were trying to
“cure” homosexuals by injecting them with
apomorphine, a nausea-inducing drug, while showing
them pictures of male nudes. And overwhelmingly, the
dominant school of psychology worldwide at the time
was the behaviorism of Harvard prof B. F. Skinner.
His was what one might call a “black box”
psychology: scientists measured the stimulus and the
response but exhibited no interest whatsoever in
what happened between the two, as being
intrinsically immeasurable and therefore unknowable.
While Skinner might have quibbled about the details
of the Ludovico Method (for example, that Alex got
the injection at the wrong time in relation to the
violent films that he had to watch), he would not
have rejected its scientific—or rather
scientistic—philosophy.
In 1971, the very year in
which the Kubrick film of A Clockwork Orange was released, Skinner
published a book entitled Beyond Freedom and
Dignity. He sneered at the possibility that
reflection upon our own personal experience and on
history might be a valuable source of guidance to us
in our attempts to govern our lives. “What we need,”
he wrote, “is a technology of behavior.”
Fortunately, one was at hand. “A technology of
operant behavior is . . . already well advanced, and
it may prove commensurate with our problems.” As he
put it, “[a] scientific analysis shifts the credit
as well as the blame [for a man’s behavior] to the
environment.” What goes on in a man’s mind is quite
irrelevant; indeed, “mind,” says Skinner, is “an
explanatory fiction.”
For Skinner, being
good is behaving well; and whether a man behaves
well or badly depends solely upon the schedule of
reinforcement that he has experienced in the past,
not upon anything that goes on in his mind. It
follows that there is no new situation in a man’s
life that requires conscious reflection if he is to
resolve the dilemma or make the choices that the new
situation poses: for everything is merely a replay
of the past, generalized to meet the new situation.
The Ludovico
Method, then, was not a far-fetched invention of
Burgess’s but a simplified version—perhaps a
reductio ad absurdum, or ad nauseam—of the technique
for solving all human problems that the dominant
school of psychology at the time suggested. Burgess
was a lapsed Catholic, but he remained deeply
influenced by Catholic thought throughout his life.
The Skinnerian view of man appalled him. He thought
that a human being whose behavior was simply the
expression of conditioned responses was not fully
human but an automaton. If he did the right thing
merely in the way that Pavlov’s dog salivated at the
sound of a bell, he could not be a good man: indeed,
if all his behavior was determined in the same way,
he was hardly a man at all. A good man, in Burgess’s
view, had to have the ability to do evil as well as
good, an ability that he would voluntarily restrain,
at whatever disadvantage to himself.
Being a novelist
rather than an essayist, however, and a man of many
equivocations, Burgess put these thoughts in A Clockwork Orange into the mouth of a
ridiculous figure, the prison chaplain, who objects
to the Ludovico Method—but not enough to resign his
position, for he is eager to advance in what Alex
calls “Prison religion.” Burgess puts the defense of
the traditional view of morality as requiring the
exercise of free will—the view that there is no good
act without the possibility of a bad one—into the
mouth of a careerist.
The two endings of A Clockwork Orange—the one that Burgess
himself wrote and the truncated one that his
American publisher wanted and that Kubrick used for
his film—have very different meanings.
According to the
American-Kubrick version, Alex resumes his life as
violent gang leader after his head injury undoes the
influence of the Ludovico Method. He returns to what
he was before, once more able to listen to classical
music (Beethoven’s Ninth) and fantasize violence
without any conditioned nausea:
Oh, it was
gorgeosity and yumyumyum. When it came to the
Scherzo I could viddy myself very clear running
and running on like very light and mysterious
nogas [feet], carving the whole litso [face] of
the creeching [screaming] world with my cut-throat
britva [razor]. And there was the slow movement
and the lovely last singing movement still to
come. I was cured all right.
Kubrick even
suggests that this is a happy outcome: better an
authentic psychopath than a conditioned, and
therefore inauthentic, goody-goody. Authenticity and
self-direction are thus made to be the highest
goods, regardless of how they are expressed. And
this, at least in Britain, has become a prevailing
orthodoxy among the young. If, as I have done, you
ask the aggressive young drunks who congregate by
the thousand in every British town or city on a
Saturday night why they do so, or British soccer
fans why they conduct themselves so menacingly, they
will reply that they are expressing themselves, as
if there were nothing further to be said on the
matter.
The full, British
version of A
Clockwork Orange ends very differently.
Alex begins to lose his taste for violence
spontaneously, when he sees a happy, normal couple
in a café, one of whom is a former associate of his.
Thereafter, Alex begins to imagine a different life
for himself and to fantasize a life that includes
tenderness:
There was Your
Humble Narrator Alex coming home from work to a
good hot plate of dinner, and there was this
ptitsa [girl] all welcoming and greeting like
loving. . . . I had this sudden very strong idea
that if I walked into the room next to this room
where the fire was burning away and my hot dinner
laid on the table, there I should find what I
really wanted. . . . For in that other room in a
cot was laying gurgling goo goo goo my son. . . .
I knew what was happening, O my brothers. I was
like growing up.
Burgess obviously prefers
a reformation that comes spontaneously from within,
as it does in the last chapter, to one that comes
from without, by application of the Ludovico Method.
Here he would agree with Kubrick—an internal
reformation is more authentic, and thus better in
itself because a true expression of the individual.
Perhaps Burgess also believes that such an internal
reformation is likely to go deeper and be less
susceptible to sudden reversal than reformation
brought from outside.
Burgess also
suggests the somewhat comforting message, at odds
with all that has gone before, that Alex’s violence
is nothing new in the world and that the
transformation of immature, violent, and solipsistic
young men into mature, peaceful, and considerate
older men will continue forever, as it has done in
the past, because deep inside there is a well of
goodness, man having been born with original virtue
rather than original sin (this is the Pelagian
heresy, to which Burgess admitted that he was
attracted). There is a never-ending cycle:
[Y]outh is only
being in a way like it might be an animal. No, it
is not just like being an animal so much as being
like one of these malenky [small] toys you viddy
being sold in the streets, like little chellovecks
[men] made out of tin and with a spring inside and
then a winding handle on the outside and you wind
it up grrr grrr grrr and off it itties [goes],
like walking, O my brothers. But it itties in a
straight line and bangs straight into things bang
bang and it cannot help what it is doing. Being
young is like being like one of these malenky
machines.
My son, my son.
When I had my son I would explain all that to him
when he was starry [old] enough to like
understand. But then I knew he would not
understand or would not want to understand at all
and would do all the veshches [things] I had done
. . . and I would not be able to really stop him.
And nor would he be able to stop his own son,
brothers. And so it would itty on to like the end
of the world.
And this, surely,
is partly right. Four centuries ago, Shakespeare
wrote:
I would there
were no age between sixteen and three-and-twenty,
or that youth would sleep out the rest; for there
is nothing in the between but getting wenches with
child, wronging the ancientry, stealing, fighting.
And certainly it is
true that criminality, statistically speaking, is an
activity of the young and that there are few
prisoners in the prison in which I worked who had
been incarcerated for a crime committed after age
35. There seems to be a biological dimension to
common-or-garden wrongdoing.
But a quietistic
message—cheerful insofar as it implies that violence
among young men is but a passing phase of their life
and that the current era is no worse in this respect
than any past age, and pessimistic in the sense that
a reduction of the overall level of violence is
impossible—is greatly at odds with the socially
prophetic aspect of the book, which repeatedly warns
that the coming new youth culture, shallow and
worthless, will be unprecedentedly violent and
antisocial. And of Britain, at least, Burgess was
certainly right. He extrapolated from what he saw in
the prime manifestation of the emerging youth
culture, pop music, to a future in which
self-control had shrunk to vanishing, and he
realized that the result could only be a Hobbesian
world, in which personal and childish whim was the
only authority to guide action. Like all prophets,
he extrapolated to the nth degree; but a brief
residence in a British slum should persuade anyone
that he was not altogether wide of the mark.
A Clockwork Orange is not completely
coherent. If youth is violent because the young are
like “malenky machines” who cannot help themselves,
what becomes of the free will that Burgess otherwise
saw as the precondition of morality? Do people grow
into free will from a state of automatism, and, if
so, how and when? And if violence is only a passing
phase, why should the youth of one age be much more
violent than the youth of another? How do we achieve
goodness, both on an individual and social level,
without resort to the crude behaviorism of the
Ludovico Method or any other form of cruelty? Can we
bypass consciousness and reflection in our struggle
to behave well?
There are no
schematic answers in the book. One cannot condemn a
novel of 150 pages for failing to answer some of the
most difficult and puzzling questions of human
existence, but one can praise it for raising them in
a peculiarly profound manner and forcing us to think
about them. To have combined this with acute social
prophecy (to say nothing of entertainment) is genius. (read
more)
2023-11-20
b
THE
STATE OF THE DISUNION V
TARGET
HAS A CORPORATE DEATH WISH.
The spay & neuter TRANS CULT is a tiny
faction.
Is their buying power sufficient
to overcome the boycott from the moral majority
that opposes castration, mastectomies, penis
inversions
and cross-sex hormones for preteens and
teens?
2023-11-20
a
THE
STATE OF THE DISUNION IV
GEORGIA ELECTORAL
FRAUD UPDATE
Keep an eye on this story.
Three eye-witnesses, under oath, with same story
about allegedly fake ballots. An alleged room full
of proof (the actual ballots) kept locked for three
years. Lawyers for the defense suddenly bailing out.
Lower court dawdling, but ordered by higher court to
unlock the door.
...
*
*
*
Hard to overstate how this
trial will impact Jack Smith’s election/J6 case in
DC. On same day draft of jury questionnaire is due
for DC trial, a bench trial in GA will begin that
could unravel a central piece of Smith’s indictment
and role of one of his star witnesses—Brad
Raffensberger.
*
In an earlier October 11, 2020
ruling, Judge Totenberg stated there was
“demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of
Dominion’s systems by the State of Georgia places
voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their
fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which
the judge defined simply as a “vote that is
accurately counted.” Totenberg also stated in her
ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and
the application of a risk-limiting-audit to an
election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a
true risk-limiting audit.” Election security expert
J. Alex Halderman noted the same issues in a sworn
declaration, telling the court, “if voters do not
reliably detect when their paper ballots are wrong,
no amount of post-election auditing can detect or
correct the problem.” None of this kept Secretary of
State Raffensperger from announcing the results of
the audit as certain: “Secretary of State Brad
Raffensperger announced the results of the Risk
Limiting Audit of Georgia’s presidential contest,
which upheld and reaffirmed the original outcome
produced by the machine tally of votes cast. Due to
the tight margin of the race and the principles of
risk-limiting audits, this audit was a full manual
tally of all votes cast. The audit confirmed that
the original machine count accurately portrayed the
winner of the election.” Raffensperger’s statement
is in direct conflict with that of Totenberg, who
noted that “there is no audit remedy that can
confirm the reliability and accuracy of the BMD
system, as Dr. Stark has stressed.”
*
*
See also: https://rumble.com/vxr5x3-suspected-election-day-fraud-in-fulton-county-november-2020.html
*
*
2023-11-19
c
THE STATE OF THE
DISUNION III
THE BOLSHEVIKS CANNOT
AFFORD TO LOSE IN 2024.
They will resort to their usual tricks:
censorship, propaganda,
lawfare and astronomical levels of electoral
fraud.
2023-11-19
b
THE
STATE OF THE DISUNION II
THE DEPOPULATION
AGENDA IS NOT NEW.
The spike
protein mRNA clot shots are
just
the latest method used by
the Malthusians.
2023-11-19
a
THE
STATE OF THE DISUNION I
WHAT
WERE NEWSPAPER EDITORIAL
BOARDS DOING
WHEN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS
STOPPED USING PHONICS
TO TEACH READING IN
KINDERGARTEN & FIRST
GRADE?
NOTHING. ABSOLUTELY
NOTHING BEYOND LAMENTING
THAT "JOHNNY CAN'T
READ."
2023-11-18
e
THE
REAL REASON V
ARE BLUE STATES
LEGALIZING RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA
TO BENEFIT CARTELS OR TO DESTROY FAMILIES
OR TO INCREASE TAX RECEIPTS?
*
See also: https://scitechdaily.com/high-risk-extensive-study-links-cannabis-use-disorder-to-bipolar-and-depression/
2023-11-18
d
THE
REAL REASON IV
IS THE HOST OF READING RAINBOW ON PBS
A SODOMITE OR A GROOMER OR
BOTH A SODOMITE & GROOMER?
*
*
*
See also:
2023-11-18
c
THE
REAL REASON III
THOUGH THEY CALL MUSK
AN ANTISEMITE (HE ISN'T.)
THEY WANT TO DESTROY HIM BECAUSE TWITTER
ALLOWS A BIT OF FREE SPEECH
*
*
*
*
*
*
2023-11-18 b
THE
REAL REASON II
THE US HAS NO MORE 155MM
SHELLS TO EXPORT.
So America is not sending any more to Israel,
which was then sending them to the Ukraine.
2023-11-18
a
THE REAL
REASON I
We have a major Tiktok
problem.
Leaked audio of ADL chief
executive Jonathan Greenblatt freaking out because
global youth aren't buying Israel's propaganda
anymore. #Gaza
pic.twitter.com/tzU02bSXAm
— Sharmine Narwani (@snarwani)
November 16, 2023
*
See also: https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/middle-east/israel-losing-pr-war-opposition-leader-says-netanyahu-must-go/
______________________
Permission is hereby granted to any and all to
copy and paste any entry on this page and
convey it electronically along with its URL,
http://www.usaapay.com/comm.html
______________________
2023 ARCHIVE
2022 ARCHIVE
2021 ARCHIVE
2020 ARCHIVE
-0-
|
...
News and facts for
those sick and tired of the National Propaganda Radio
version of reality.
- Unlike all the legacy media, our editorial offices are
not in Langley, Virginia.
- You won't catch
us fiddling while Western Civilization burns.
- Close the windows so you don't hear the
mockingbird outside, grab a beer, and see what the hell
is going on as we witness the controlled demolition of
our society.
- The truth
usually comes from one source. It comes quietly, with no
heralds. Untruths come from multiple sources, in unison,
and incessantly.
- The loudest
partisans belong to the smallest parties. The media
exaggerate their size and influence.
|